<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://omeka-test.library.appstate.edu/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;tags=family" accessDate="2026-10-15T04:53:29-04:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
      <perPage>50</perPage>
      <totalResults>3</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="43712" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="19926">
        <src>https://omeka-test.library.appstate.edu/files/original/64d40aa75dee7fb47fa129f8adda150c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>919db2b0ac66ae9803252252e9ed7529</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="9">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="199">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="891114">
                    <text>�THE EXAMINED LIFE

�Appalachian Consortium Press

The Appalachian Consortium is a non-profit educational organization comprised of institutions and agencies located in the Southern
Highlands. Our members are volunteers who plan and execute projects
which serve 156 mountain counties in seven states. Among our goals
are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Preserving the cultural heritage of Southern Appalachia
Protecting the mountain environment
Publishing manuscripts about the region
Improving educational opportunities for area students and teachers
Conducting scientific, social, and economic research
Promoting a positive image of Appalachia
Encouraging regional cooperation

The member institutions of the Appalachian Consortium are:
Appalachian State University
Blue Ridge Parkway
East Tennessee State University
Gardner-Webb College
Great Smoky Mountains Natural History Association
John C. Campbell Folk School
Lees-McRae College
Mars Hill College
Mayland Community College
N. C. Division of Archives and History
Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy
Southern Highlands Handicraft Guild
U. S. Forest Service
Warren Wilson College
Western Carolina University
Western North Carolina Historical Association

�THE EXAMINED LIFE:

in American Literature
by Jim Wayne Miller, Institute Presenter
Karen Lohr, Editor and Project Coordinator
Jane Shook, Managing Editor and Site Coordinator
Barry M. Buxton, Project Director

�The Appalachian Consortium was a non-profit educational organization
composed of institutions and agencies located in Southern Appalachia. From
1973 to 2004, its members published pioneering works in Appalachian studies
documenting the history and cultural heritage of the region. The Appalachian
Consortium Press was the first publisher devoted solely to the region and many of
the works it published remain seminal in the field to this day.
With funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the National
Endowment for the Humanities through the Humanities Open Book Program,
Appalachian State University has published new paperback and open access
digital editions of works from the Appalachian Consortium Press.
www.collections.library.appstate.edu/appconsortiumbooks
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND license. To view a
copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses.
Original copyright © 1989 by the Appalachian Consortium Press.
ISBN (ebook): 978-1-4696-4238-3
Distributed by the University of North Carolina Press
www.uncpress.org

�Table of Contents
vil - vill
ix - xi
1
2-15

Preface—Karen Lohr

WORK

Introduction—Jim Wayne Miller

60 - 75

"A Busy Multitude": Work in American Life and
Literature—Jim Wayne Miller

FAMILY

76 - 78

Participant Reflections: Work

79 - 84

Out of Work—Louis H. Palmer, III

84 - 85

Bibliography of Supplemental Works

"The Oldest Unit in the World": The Family in
American Life and Literature
—Jim Wayne Miller

16-18

Participant Reflections: Family

19 - 23

The Theme of Family in Hamlet and The Sound
and the Fury—Barbara Benson

24-25

A Family in Crisis: A Unit of Study of James
Agee's A Death in the Family
—Patricia B. Chastain

26 - 27

Bringing Characters to Life—Stan Coss

29

59

COMMUNITY

30 - 49

"Members of Each Other": Community in
American Life and Literature
—Jim Wayne Miller

50 - 52

Participant Reflections: Community

52 - 56

Explore Cultural Values in Your Own
Community Through Literature!—Jo Buckner

56 - 57

Community in Nathaniel Hawthorne's Work
—Sherrie Hartsoe

86
87 - 89
89

Further Readings
Critical Readings of American Thought
Acknowledgments

�This page intentionally left blank

�vii

Preface
"We all have a stake in seeing to it that the humanities
are properly taught and thoroughly learned in our schools.
We all have a stake in making sure our children know the
shape of the river they are traveling."
Lynne Cheney, Chairman of the National Endowment for the
Humanities, in "American Memory" calls for a renewed
commitment among those in higher education to strengthen
humanities education in our nation's public schools. We at the
Appalachian Consortium share this concern. In the Southern
Highlands, where dropout rates are as high as 40 and 50 percent,
ensuring that our young people are acquainted with history,
literature, and the cultural values that have shaped our present
society has emerged as a clear priority. Most of the states within
our region have identified education as a foremost concern, even
ahead of economic development. We recognize that the challenge
of imparting cultural literacy to our youth most often falls on the
shoulders of teachers in our public schools. The Appalachian
Consortium is dedicated to assisting our teachers in providing
students with a meaningful and stimulating encounter with the
humanities, an encounter which is vital in transmitting an
understanding of American values and culture.
Recognizing that public school teachers in the Southern
Highlands were searching for resources to enliven and enrich
their humanities programs, the Consortium, with support from
the National Endowment for the Humanities, initiated the
Southern Highlands Institute for Educators (SHIE). During the
summer of 1984 programs were offered at four regional universities
with over 120 teachers attending. Their response convinced
Consortium members that the offering of quality summer institutes
and the establishment of sustainable channels of communication
among educators in our public schools and universities are
perhaps the most significant and far-reaching contributions the
organization will make to the future of public education in the

region we serve.
"Cultural Values In American Literature" has been a fouryear SHIE program supported by the National Endowment for
the Humanities. The 1986-88 summer institutes, led by Dr. Jim
Wayne Miller, focused on a triad of concepts, "family, community,
work," central to achieving a better understanding of our values,
beliefs, and behavior. The words of participants in the 1986-88
Southern Highlands Institute for Educators best describe the
benefits of programs which bring together educators and scholars
in the hum am'ties:
*7 have found this institute to be vital, inspiring, and
transformational. It has increased my knowledge of
literature in ways that will be helpful and stimulating to
my students. Too often teachers are treated like old books
and put into a certain place to gather dust. We need to be
taken down and at least thumbed through occasionally,
and the typical district curriculum course is not quite the
right kind of handling. We need more programs like this
one."
One of the most successful components of the 1984 Southern
Highlands Institute for Educators was the publication of a
resource guide for teachers entitled Reading, Writing, Region,
authored by Jim Wayne Miller. The publication provides a
checklist, purchase guide, and directory for educators and school
and community libraries in the region.
We are pleased to publish this companion volume, The
Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American
Literature. In this work Dr. Miller explores the cultural values
which "affirm our humanity" (Cheney) and lead us to a richer
understanding of ourselves, the community we live in, our
nation, and our global community. Elements of culture given
voice in literature, such as family, community, and work, become
maps that help orient us in regard to place and time, thereby
providing students with a means for self-explanation, self-

�via

knowledge. Dr. Miller describes his consideration of the central
cultural values as "an effort to make a whole out of parts." Too
often we limit our reflection on such values to the parameters of
the discipline we are immersed in—history, literature, sciences.
In this work Dr. Miller bridges the gaps between disciplines, thus
providing a valuable resource for all involved in public education.
He suggests, "We can guide our students to reflection on their
heritage, to a perspective on human existence and a connection
to permanent concerns by helping them, as others have helped
us, to make a whole out of parts."
The Examined Life is designed to provide a guide for humanities
educators to resources helpful in integrating the three cultural
themes into a broader curriculum. The introduction presented by
Dr. Miller gives an orientation to the themes and the humanities
approach which considers them in a cultural, historical, and
literary context. The sections considering family, community,
and work begin with Professor Miller's in-depth discussion of
each theme and the three major literary works examined in light
of that theme. The historical framework he provides shows us
how the theme develops through time and in relation to particular
places and cultures. Thus we see family as a dynamic force rather
than a static construct.
Complementing Dr. Miller's discussion of the cultural values
and their expression in the literary texts are excerpts from
essays written by participating teachers. These passages provide
unique insights to the themes and texts examined during the
summer programs. Following these considerations of family,
community, and work are curriculum units developed by teachers
involved in the summer programs. This component of the guide
offers specific examples of how the thematic content can be
explored in the context of general curriculum objectives and
requirements. These resource units with their exciting and
imaginative exercises and methods will be especially useful for
humanities educators.
Finally, the publication includes an annotated bibliography

The Examined Ufe: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

of central and supplemental readings. Also presented is a
bibliography of texts useful in gaining a general background in
American history and the development of American culture and
cultures. A listing of critical works and further supplemental
texts is offered as well.
The Appalachian Consortium, with the support of the National
Endowment for the Humanities, is pleased to make this valuable
resource guide available to humanities teachers and public
schools in the Southern Highlands. The foremost priority of the
Appalachian Consortium in all our educational services is
commitment to assisting public school teachers in providing a
vital and enriching educational experience for our young people.
We look to our teachers for suggestions and input on ways to meet
this challenge.
Karen Lohr
Editor

�ix

Introduction
The works chosen as major texts to facilitate examination of
the themes of family, community, and work have been selected
for their intrinsic literary value; for the way in which they
suggest the interrelatedness of the three themes; and for their
usefulness in dramatizing and illuminating the themes as
meanings, values, and systems of significance that inform people's
lives.
In selecting texts, consideration has also been given to
providing historical perspective on the American experience.
Texts chosen represent a span of time from Colonial America to
the 1950's—from Franklin's Autobiography to Harriette Arnow's
The Dollmaker and James Agee's A Death in the Family.
Geographically, the works deal with the deep South (The Sound
and the Fury), New England (The Scarlet Letter, "Civil
Disobedience" and Walden, The Rise of Silas Lapham\ and also
the Midwest (Main Street, Giants in the Earth).
Throughout the three summers during which these texts
were studied, the controlling purpose of examination was to
discover the ways in which cultural values common to all mankind
have been cast in a distinctly American shape and reflected in
literary works which are classics in the American literary tradition.
The tension between the individual and those forms of existence
which force him to interact with others (in the family, the
community, and the workplace) informs each of the major texts
selected. The working out of this tension (whether one labels it
the clash between the ideal and the pragmatic, or between the
individual and society) on American soil, by the American mind
and spirit, is at the heart of each work selected for examination.
The Sound and the Fury, A Death in the Family, and The
Dollmaker have been selected as major texts for study because of
the ways in which they engage the theme of family as a cultural
value; The Scarlet Letter, Walden, and "Civil Disobedience" for
the way in which they illuminate the theme of community; and

Franklin's Autobiography, The Rise of Silas Lapham, andGiants
in the Earth for their revealing confrontations with the theme of
work.
A secondary consideration in the selection of these works was
the way in which these texts afford an examination of the
interpenetration of family, community, and work in an overall
consideration of cultural values in American life. In The Scarlet
Letter, Hester Prynne, the Reverend Mr. Dimmesdale, and their
daughter Pearl constitute a family—a fact which is finally
acknowledged in the revelation on the marketplace scaffold.
Thoreau, in Walden, has insightful comments on work. Main
Street engages the theme of family as well as work. Franklin's
Autobiography relates how he was able to make himself useful,
through industry and good habits, not only to himself but to his
family and to his community. The Rise of Silas Lapham offers an
instance of a hard-working, self-made man in relation to his
family and to a larger community which does not fully share his
assessment of himself. Giants in the Earth depicts the protagonist,
Per Hansa, in his relationship to his family and to a community
of settlers as he struggles to wrest a living from the earth.
Roelvaagfs novel also offers a parallel experience to that found in
Arnow's The Dollmaker, for both works deal with the immigrant
experience in America. Per Hansa and his family come to
America from another country. Arnow's Southern Appalachians
differ from Roelvaag's characters only in that they have become
immigrants in the country of their birth. But like all immigrants,
they must bear the memory of a homeland into a new place and
out of that experience work to make a new life in a new
community.
The irreducible cultural values found in the American
experience, and which Americans hold with varying degrees of
ambivalence, may be found in Franklin's utilitarianism and
cheerful reasonableness, and in Thoreau's unbending individualism
and uncompromising idealism. Interpretations and
understandings of the themes of family, community, and work, as

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

reflected in all the texts to be studied, may vary according to
whether they are seen from the standpoint of utilitarianism or
idealism. Franklin's alertness to opportunity and his gregarious
flexibility would certainly strike Thoreau, at times, as deplorable
expedience. Thoreau would not be amused by Franklin's tonguein-cheek observation: "So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable
Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for every
thing one has a mind to do." Thoreau would hardly approve
Franklin's easy distinction between truth and utility, as when
Franklin observes, regarding Deism:".. .1 began to suspect that
this Doctrine tho' it might be true, was not very useful."
Thoreau's devotion to the supremacy of truth leads him
beyond consideration of mere utility. He asserts that "any man
more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one
already." Whereas Franklin tends to consider the usefulness of a
view, Thoreau is devoted to "Action from principle" [which]
"changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and
does not consist wholly with anything which was. It not only
divides States and churches, it divides families; ay, it divides the
individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine."
Franklin and Thoreau differ fundamentally on the value and
efficacy of group undertakings. Franklin's civic spirit manifests
itself in the founding of the Junto, precursor of the American
Philosophical Society; in his efforts to organize and establish a
school, a hospital, a fire department. He believed one served God
best by serving one's fellow man. He believed in the possibility of
influencing people in the mass (and often did this by discussing
public issues in his newspaper). He considered it worthwhile to
undertake projects for the common good. And whereas Thoreau
emphasizes action proceeding from principle, which "changes
things and relations" and is discontinuous with what previously
exists, Franklin stresses small improvements: "Human Felicity
is produced not so much by great Pieces of good Fortune that
seldom happen, as by little Advantages that occur every day."
Franklin would gradually improve conditions for the sake of

everyone, for the entire community. Thoreau finds "little virtue
in the action of masses of men." He recommends, rather, action
which changes the individual. In the following passage from
"Civil Disobedience" Thoreau might seem to be scoffing at the
views and values of Franklin, whose life was characterized by
altruistic and philanthropic undertakings, and by projects of
mutual benefit to those involved:
The American has dwindled into an Odd Fellow—one
who may be known by the development of his organ of
gregariousness, and a manifest lack of intellect and cheerful
self-reliance; whose first and chief concern, on coming into
the world, is to see that the almshouses are in good repair;
and, before yet he has lawfully donned the virile garb, to
collect a fund for the support of widows and orphans that
may be; who, in short, ventures to live only by the aid of the
Mutual Insurance Company, which has promised to bury
him decently.
(Thoreau's view here also contains an implicit judgment of Carol
Kennicott and the community of Gopher Prairie which Carol
attempts to reform.) Thoreau might number Franklin among
those "men of a certain experience and discrimination" [who]
"have no doubt invented ingenious and even useful systems, for
which we sincerely thank them; but all their wit and usefulness
lie within certain not very wide limits. They are wont to forget
that the world is not governed by policy and expediency."
By dramatizing the difference between Franklin's
utilitarianism and Thoreau's idealism, we may better examine
these strains in American cultural values as they are reflected in
other texts studied; for they can be seen to lie in the American
experience, as Lewis expresses it in Main Street, "like enemies
yoked." Seminar participants have examined how Thoreau himself
manages the tension between the mundane, practical, and
material world, and the domain of the spiritual and ideal in
Walden, where he deals not only with "Economy" but also with

�INTRODUCTION

xi

"Where I Lived, and What I Lived For," with "Solitude" and with
"Visitors," with "Higher Laws" and with "Brute Neighbors." Such
considerations provide a perspective from which to examine not
only other texts selected for study, but the contemporary American
experience with respect to family, community, and work; a
perspective from which to consider the possibilities for combining
individualism and a sense of family and community; work with
meaning in the context of individual, family, and community
values.
In each instance the task, as Everett Carter defines it, is to
identify those values which permeate the "American Idea," to
recognize the underlying tensions, and to examine the ways in
which selected American writers either accept or reject or modify
these values in the ordered world of their creations.
Jim Wayne Miller

�This page intentionally left blank

�Family

John Hicks tells of an outsider trying to buy his land. It seems the man believed it was only a matter of price, and he could
not understand John's refusals to sell. 'Why, I couldn't sell that. My people lived there before the Revolution: they walked on
it and worked on it all them years. And my people's buried up there."
Laura M. Hodges, "A Survey of the Relationship of Land and
Character Development in Representative Southern
Literature"

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

2

"The Oldest Unit in the World":The Family
in American Life and Literature
They were for an interval once more on the land, a unit
together, the oldest unit in the world: a family.
Wilma Dykeman, The Far Family
Writers and thinkers, ancient and modern, view the family as
our oldest and most important human institution. "God setteth
the solitary in families," we read in Psalm 68. Indeed, some
descriptions of the family suggest through their imagery that the
family is not an arrangement devised by human beings, but
rather a part of creation, like trees and flowers. The Chinese
philosopher Mencius, three centuries before CHrist, sees the
family as "the root of the state" (Bartlett, 89). The Romantic
German poet Friedrich von Hardenberg (Novalis) agrees:
"Marriage is to politics what the lever is to engineering. The state
is not founded upon single individuals, but upon couples and
groups" (Viking, 195). C. G. Jung also relates the family to the
larger society; he considers the family to be a model for the larger
society. The family stamps its character upon the child, who
tends to see its earlier miniature world again in the larger adult
world. The world, for each of us, is to varying degrees a parental
image (Jung, 125). Robert Frost, who habitually questioned
conventional wisdom (cf. his questioning of the platitude "Good
fences make good neighbors," in "Mending Wall"), never doubted
the importance of the family. Frost writes, in "Build Soil" (325):
Don't join too many gangs. Join few if any.
Join the United States and join the family—
But not much in between unless a college.
If the family has long been considered the fundamental unit
of human society, it has been viewed not as a static, but rather a
dynamic structure. Some have been able to see a more or less
constant evolution of the family in the western world; others

have predicted its demise, at least in one of its manifestations.
Lewis Henry Morgan, the nineteenth-century American ethnologist, writes that the "monogamian family has improved greatly
since the commencement of civilization," and especially in the
nineteenth century. Hence, it was not unreasonable to suppose
that the family was capable of still further improvement "until
the equality of the sexes is attained" (The Great Thoughts, 301).
On the other hand, Karl Marx, Morgan's contemporary, predicted
that the bourgeois family would disappear along with the bourgeoise as a class. Marx railed against "bourgeois clap-trap about
the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of
parent and child," which was contradicted by the situation of the
family in industrial society where "all family ties among the proletariat are torn asunder, and their children transformed into
simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor" (Elster, 263).
Something close to Marx's view has become the conventional
wisdom, even among those who are not Marxists in their social
and economic views. The notion that the family (despite the
abolition of child labor) has suffered in the modern world dominated
by industry and technology is a common one. We imagine a preindustrial West in which the family existed in something
approaching an ideal state. In this regard, we are surely mistaken,
for the modern era began long before the Industrial Revolution,
which was only one of the modern era's manifestations. In 1611,
only four years after the first permanent English settlement in
America was established at Jamestown (1607), and well before
the establishment of the Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay
Colonies in New England (1620 and 1628 respectively), John
Donne complained, in "An Anatomie of the World: The First
Anniversary" (191) of a breakdown of all traditional relationships
and institutions, including the family:
Tis all in peeces, all cohaerence gone;
All just supply, and all Relation:
Prince, Subject, Father, Sonne, are things forgot,
For every man alone thinks he hath got

�FAMILY

To be a Phoenix, and that then can bee
None of that kind, of which he is, but hee.
If we are to believe these verses, the modern era, and the
"breakdown" of the traditional family, begins with the Renaissance
individualism to which Donne refers.
The meaning of the word "family" has shifted throughout its
history in the English language, and it is to a felt shift in societal
relations that Donne is responding in his "Anatomie of the
World." "Family" became established in English in the late 1300s
and early 1400s, derived from the French familia, stemming
from the Latin word meaning "household," and ultimately from
the Latin root word famulus, a servant. The Latin word denoted
either a group of servants or blood-relations and servants living
together in one household. In English the meaning of "family"
was subsequently extended until, by the end of the fifteenth
century, it was used to mean not a household, but a house in the
sense of a lineage or kin-group, those descended from a common
ancestor. "Family" in the Authorized (Ring James) Version of the
Bible, which appeared in 1611, the same year as Donne's "Anatomie
of the World," is used either in the sense of a large kin-group,
often almost synonymously with tribe, or in the sense of lineage
from a common ancestor.
Before the seventeenth century the word "family" is not used
to refer to a small group of close blood relatives. (In the King
James Bible the relationship between parents and children is
denoted by the term near &amp;m.) Yet between the seventeenth and
nineteenth centuries the meaning of the word shifted, and
"family" came to mean a small group of close relatives, usually
parents and children, living in one house. This shift has made
necessary the twentieth century distinction between the nuclear
family and the larger extended family (Williams, 108-11).
It is difficult to know the degree to which the contemporary
family in the West has changed through the centuries, for our
study of kinship and the family began only about one hundred
years ago. But we do know that one of the early and extremely

3

influential sociologists, Frederic Le Play of France, idealized the
pre-industrial "traditional" (extended) family when, in the 1870s,
he contrasted it favorably with the post-industrial nuclear family
consisting of parents and children. Much of what has been
learned about the history of the family since Le Play wrote has
amounted to a cumulative correction of Le Play's views of the
traditional family (Gies, 4-5).
Generally speaking, it is safe to say that we have, on the one
hand, romanticized the past, and imagined the family as existing
in some idyllic state; on the other, we have viewed the past as
hopelessly benighted and brutish, with the family existing in
only the most rudimentary form. Studies suggest that neither
view is tenable. It has been a widely held view, for instance, that
the notion of childhood as a distinct phase of life did not exist
before the sixteenth century. But detailed studies of the Middle
Ages provide evidence that children were at all times valued and
held in great affection, and that parents in Medieval Europe did
not lack a concept of childhood (Gies, 5,12,219).
Our study of the family over the past century further suggests
that there never has been a single family type, but rather at least
three historical types: the large "open lineage" family; the smaller
"restricted patriarchal nuclear family"; and the "closed
domesticated nuclear family" of the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries (Gies, 8).
Family type, it has been discovered, varies with class
distinction. For instance, the family based on lineage, important
to the aristocracy, hardly existed among artisans, craftsmen,
shopkeepers, and laborers in eleventh- and twelfth-century Genoa,
Italy. The families of these people tended to consist of parents
and children, under one roof, with, occasionally, an aged parent
or parents or son-in-law or daughter-in-law. The larger group to
which an artisan or craftsman belonged consisted not of kin, but
of other members of his guild (Gies, 149).
Families varied not only according to type during the Medieval
period (from about 500 AD to about 1500 AD), but they varied in

�4

response to social and economic conditions. During the thirteenth
and fourteenth centuries, when the Black Death ravaged the
populations of European towns at approximately ten-year
intervals, studies show that survivors responded by marrying
early and having more children (Gies, 233). When and where the
power of government was weak, the family (understood to mean
the clan or kindred) grew stronger and more influential; when
and where the power of government was strong and effective, the
importance of the family waned. And though we are prone to
think that reductions in the function of the family have occurred
only in the post-industrial period, studies reveal that between
Roman times and the Reformation (approximately between 500
AD and 1500 AD), while the economic function tended to remain
strong, other functions of the family were reduced to such a
degree that both Romans and Germanic peoples who settled
within the Empire would have found the European family of
1500 quite different from what they had known. The Christian
Church took over religious functions; justice was a matter for
secular and ecclesiastical courts to deal with; craft guilds, national
governments, schools, and universities assumed other economic,
social, and educational functions formerly performed by the
family (Gies, 295-96).
What has been learned during the last one hundred years
about the history of the family highlights its protean ability to
assume different forms, its adaptability and resilience as an
institution. But where the historical perspective is lacking, any
change in the family's form or function, and any adaptation to
altered circumstances is apt to be perceived with alarm.
The history of the American family shows a continuing
flexibility, adaptability, and resilience in its form and function.
Alexis de Tocqueville wrote, after visiting the United States in
the 1830s, that the family, "in the Roman and aristocratic
signification of the word," did not exist in America. But the family
he observed in the United States in the first third of the nineteenth
century had perhaps only carried forward trends observable in

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

Europe, where, as Tocqueville had already pointed out, "the
several members of a family stand upon an entirely new footing
towards each other... the distance which formerly separated a
father and his sons has been lessened... paternal authority, if
not destroyed, is at least impaired" (Tocqueville, v. 2: 229).
The colonial and frontier family in America was a blend of
European heritage and new conditions. Harvey Wish, in his
Society and Thought in America, describes the colonial and
frontier family as a "strong patriarchal unit, strengthened by the
economic role of both old and young, as well as by religious,
biological, and social needs" (1:49). Rural families were closely
knit by economic ties; yet, if these families were patriarchal, and
they were, conditions on the frontier favoring equality were
abetted by the Renaissance individualism which John Donne
deplored in "An Anatomie of the World."
In accordance with both European heritage and the demands
of the conditions in which they found themselves, American
colonists and settlers of all social and economic groups tended to
marry early and have large families. It was not uncommon for
couples to have more than a dozen children. And while, as might
be suspected, such large families often resulted in a high mortality
rate among women, this was not inevitably the case. Records
from New England towns and villages provide examples of
women who bore ten, twelve, and even fifteen children and who
lived to the ages of ninety-seven, ninety-three, and seventyseven respectively (Wertenbaker, 183-4).
Families were, of economic necessity, close-knit. Wives and
children shared in the work of clearing land and raising crops
when, throughout the seventeenth century and much of the
eighteenth, as much as ninety per cent of the population derived
its livelihood from agriculture. Since economic factors were so
dominant in determining the nature of the family, the family
group, at least in some colonies, "tended to include legally the
wards, apprentices, and servants as well as the children" (Adams,
11).

�FAMILY

Yet family life was not always harmonious and idyllic. Our
histories of the American Civil War have taught us that families
were divided by issues over which the Civil War was fought—
that fathers and sons and brothers often opposed each other on
the field of battle; but we are less likely to know that colonial
families were similarly divided by the Revolutionary War. While
sons tended to be advocates of revolution, their fathers remaining
loyal to the English crown, this was not always the case;
occasionally, fathers were the revolutionists, while the sons were
loyalists. Such was the case of Benjamin Franklin and his son
William (Greene, 227).
Both before and after the Revolution, the family played an
important role in immigration, first to the colonies and later to
the new young nation. Often families, and sometimes entire
communtities (q.v.) immigrated together. It was also not uncommon
for a man to establish himself in the colonies or in the new
republic and then arrange for his family's passage to their new
home. Later immigrants often had family connections in America;
these relatives exercised a stabilizing influence as immigrants
gained an economic footing in their new situation (Fish, 111).
Bernard Bailyn's analysis of immigration from England, Scotland,
and Ireland just prior to the Revolution leads him to conclude
that there were two immigrations: one, consisting mainly of
young unmarried males drawn from London and the southern
parts of England; and another consisting largely of entire families
from northern England, Scotland, and Protestant Northern
Ireland (126-203). Immigration to America resulting from political
unrest in Germany in 1848 also brought a conspicuously large
number of entire families who attempted to re-establish their
family and community groups in America (Fish, 117-18).
These German-speaking immigrants, the so-called FortyEighters, arrived in America at a time when technological
innovation (the railroad, the steamship, the telegraph) were
beginning to profoundly alter the American home, hence the
family. Generally improved means of transportation and

5

communications, together with improved living conditions in
urban areas (running water, sewage systems, indoor toilets and
baths), conspired to make family life in the American tity markedly
different from that of small towns, villages, and rural areas
(Fish, 330-32).
While rural family life would remain largely unaffected by
these changes, in some areas until the rural electrification
programs of the 1930s, American family life in urban areas,
according to one authoritative historian, "lost much of its old
privacy," as the word "home," which in England was freighted
with emotion and intimacy, became almost synonymous with
"house." "Americans lived in a new realm of uncertain boundaries,
in an affable, communal world which... was neither public nor
private: a world of first names, open doors, front porches, and
front lawns, and naturally, too, of lunch counters, restaurants,
and hotel lobbies... Casual acquaintances soon seemed ^members
of the family*" (Boorstin, 144).
Compared to the European family of the same period, the
American family of the nineteenth century was characterized by
a casualness and laxness. According to Henry Steele Commager,
"Parents were notoriously indulgent of their children and children
notoriously disrespectful of parents, yet family life was on the
whole happy, and most children grew up to be good parents and
good citizens" (Commager, 19). The British are still fond of
commenting on what is perceived as an absurd reversal of roles
in the American family. Ring Edward VIII (1894-1972), who
abdicated the throne in 1936 to marry an American, once remarked:
"The thing that impresses me most about America is the way
parents obey their children" (King Edward VIII, A-ll).
But many thoughtful people were alarmed by the changes
taking place in the American family during the mid-nineteenth
century. To them, the family seemed in a process of disintegration.
In 1858 the New York Herald commented editorially on runaway
marriages. Matrimonial agencies sprang up. Marriages were
entered into lightly, and when the marriage failed, people often

�6

remarried without troubling to dissolve the first marriage. The
selfishness and willfulness of the younger generation was
universally deplored. Ralph Waldo Emerson cited a contemporary
who lamented having been so unfortunate as to have been born
in an age "when children were nothing and to have spent his
mature life in an age when children were everything" (Cole, 16970).
By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, as more and
more Americans lived in cities, differences between rural and
urban families became increasingly apparent. Middle class city
dwellers tended to marry later and, due to increasing use of birth
control measures, had smaller families. Birth control, at first an
unmentionable topic, came to be discussed publicly, and even
commended by some medical authorities. Family size and overall
rate of population increase (despite large numbers of European
immigrants) fell throughout the last decades of the nineteenth
century and first decades of the twentieth century. In one decade
(1890-1900) the size of the average American household shrank
so noticeably that President Theodore Roosevelt accused the
"new woman" of abetting in "race suicide" and attempted to
make large families once again popular—even as Mrs. Margaret
Sanger began the formation of the American Birth Control
League (Faulkner, 162-66).
Indeed, new conditions in the cities were producing a new
American woman, whose different status had implications for
the American family. Between 1900 and 1910 the number of
female wage-earners increased dramatically (this increase was
also relative to the total number of wage-earners). We must note,
however, that the increase in women working outside the home
was limited to what has come to be known as the relatively lowpaying "service" sector of the economy. While a greater number
of women went into teaching, in professions such as law and the
clergy there were fewer women in 1910 than in 1900, and in
medicine there was only a slight increase. Analysis of statistics
suggests that women's place in the work force was still secondary

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

to the home, and that the real labor unit was not the individual
but the family. At this time it was determined that fully one-half
the women in manufacturing and trade were under the age of
twenty-five, and that many worked only until they were married.
This temporary status impeded the progress of trade unionism
among women. Consequently, women who depended solely on
their wages for their own support, or for the support of their
children or other family members, were trapped in low-paying
jobs with little opportunity for advancement or increased
compensation (Faulkner, 153-54).
Another consequence of urban dwelling was the decline,
during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, of the
single-family house. In the larger cities rapidly increasing land
values caused apartment houses, and even apartment hotels, to
almost totally supplant the single-family house. The change was
so rapid and dramatic that a writer in a popular magazine
declared that the American home had been "lifted clean off the
ground—yardless, cellarless, stairless, even kitchenless" (Faulkner,
155).
If it had not altogether disappeared, and it had not, the
importance of the American kitchen, integral to the economic
function of the family, had been significantly reduced by the
availability of restaurants, delicatessens, and canned food.
According to Rybczynski, not only the kitchen, but the entire
home had by this time been feminized; the feminine idea of the
home was dynamic, having to do not only with the masculine
notion of ease (the home as a refuge from the larger world) but
also with work—"which was why, when electricity entered the
home, it was by the kitchen door" (160-61).
But when observers in the early twentieth century spoke out
with alarm about the "breakdown" of the American home, they
had in mind not the household "plant," but the family group
itself. While most observers believed the increasing incidence of
divorce to be the greatest threat to the American family, a more
thorough study of the situation concluded that the American

�FAMILY

family, at least in "its extreme urban form," had lost six of its
seven traditional functions. Whereas in the past the family had
been held together by economic, religious, protective, educational,
recreational, and affectional functions, and by a function having
to do with social status, all had been greatly reduced or eliminated,
except for the affectional function. This analysis explained, at
least partly, the increase in divorce rates: when affection no
longer held the family together, there was nothing else to prevent
its dissolution (Slosson, 141-44).
The adaptability and resilience of the family was made clear
again during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Many observers
noted a definite strengthening of family ties as a result of the
economic emergency and the increased importance of the family
as an economic unit. Young men and women who had left the
homes of their parents were forced, because they were unable to
find or hold on to employment, to go back home, to the place, as
Robert Frost put it, "where, when you have to go there, they have
to take you in." These older children often contributed to family
support and gained prestige as members of the family's "inner
council." An observer noted that "many a family that has lost its
car has found its soul." The president of Notre Dame University
stated that "as a result of the Depression a great portion of the
American public rediscovered fireside joys, rediscovered the
things of the spirit" (Wecter, 29-33).
But the effects of the Great Depression on the American
family were certainly not all positive. Closer studies showed that
older children returning to the family fold, no longer susceptible
to paternal authority, often created family tensions (Wecter, 29).
The economic emergency, studies showed, strengthened some
families but weakened others. And if both the birth rate and the
divorce rate declined, the incidence of desertion by male heads of
households increased (Wish, v. 2. 503). Unemployment and
enforced idleness took their toll in the form of anxiety, insecurity,
apathy, and a sense of worthlessness among members of American
families (Wecter, 33).

7

The post-World War II reversal of the declining birth rate
(which had characterized the Depression years), the result of
millions of veterans returning home to marry and establish longdelayed domestic life, has been well-documented. The effects of
this post-war "baby boom," itself a further evidence of the
resilience and adaptability of the family as an institution, continue
to ripple through American society, and to contribute to widespread
concern about the contemporary American family.
Divorce, permissiveness in child-rearing (cause for alarm in
earlier times in America), continue to be topics of concern, along
with child abuse, child abandonment, and increasing incidence
of drug use among the young. The carefree innocence of childhood
can be destroyed by divorce, and children are, in some instances,
subjected to painful conflicts as divorced parents compete for the
affection of their offspring. A widely read psychiatrist comments
wryly that "Permissiveness is the principle of treating children
as if they were adults; and the tactic of making sure they never
reach that stage" (Szas, 336). Church-sponsored magazines
feature articles about the tragedy of "the fractured family"
(Graham, 3-6). The director of an agency which shelters runaway
teenagers and abandoned children declares the 1980s "the era of
the disposable child" (Daily News, September 20,1988, 4-A).
Dr. Urie Bronfenbrenner, a professor of psychology, child
development, and family relationships, believes parents are as
eager and willing as ever to spend time with their children but
find it difficult to do so simply because "conditions of life have
changed." Parents still have the primary moral and legal
responsibility for rearing their children, he writes, but (and here
he echoes earlier findings about the erosion of family functions)
many other aspects of child rearing that once were the responsibility
of the family have shifted to other societal settings, where this
responsibility is, however, not always accepted or even
acknowledged. Bronfenbrenner points out that children typically
grow up in contemporary America without coming into contact
with people who represent a diversity of ages, incomes, and

�8

educational attainments. Children rarely are able to watch
adults work at their trades, vocations, and professions. He finds
the world in which millions of children grow up to be sterile
(Bronfenbrenner, 60-66).
Yet increasing concern over the well-being of the family as an
institution seems to be equaled only by increasing certainty that
the family is the crucial and primary social unit. Some psychiatrists
are abandoning the view of the autonomous individual as the
fundamental social unit in favor of "family systems theory,"
which views the family "an emotional unit and the individual as
part of that unit rather than as an autonomous psychological
entity" (Kerr,35ff).
Thus, throughout decades when the family has been feared to
be in a process of disintegration, Americans have become
increasingly self-conscious about family. Family names have
become longer, more frequently hyphenated and "double-barrelled"
in the effort to preserve, display, or honor them. An historian
notes that between Washington and Lincoln only three presidents
had more than one Christian name, compared to five between
Taft and Truman (Commager, 415).
Newspapers, popular magazines, pundits, and advice
columnists offer up, by the day, week, and month, reams of
commentary on the family, both alarming and reassuring. A
medical ethics student sees sinister implications for the family in
an invitation that urges guests to "bring your significant other
and any associated children" (Memphis, A-9). Senator Daniel
Patrick Moynihan's 1985 Godkin Lectures at Harvard, published
in paperback under the title Family and Nation, are discussed by
one syndicated newspaper columnist (Broder, A-9), while another
recommends "positive reinforcement" for the idea of monogamous
life to counter the "gradual evanescence of the family" (Buckley,
A-5). An entertainer asks on the cover of a magazine supplement
to a Sunday newspaper, "What Is a Real Family, Anyway?"
(Thomas, 4-6). Dr. Benjamin Spock's changing views are reported
regularly (MacDonald, D—8-9). A curmudgeon writes to an

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

advice columnist to blame liberated women for broken marriages
and shattered families (Landers, 4-B).
More reassuring, a weekly news magazine reports on a social
psychologist's findings that disadvantaged children are often
amazingly resilient: "The picture we have of disadvantaged
youth is much more encouraging..." (Monmaney, 67). Another
magazine supplement to a Sunday newspaper suggests the
death of the family is an exaggeration (Rich, 16-19). A scholarly
paper originally presented at a professional conference, then
published in a book entitled Passionate Attachments: Thinking
About Love, and then reprinted in a middle-brow magazine,
asserts that the contemporary American family (excluding the
poor black family) "is not, as is generally supposed, disintegrating because of the very high divorce rate... the median duration
of marriage today is almost exactly the same as it was 100 years
ago" (Stone, 32).
Facts, figures, and opinions regarding the family fly at us
from every direction—some, like those overheard in passing
ubiquitous radios and television sets, too fleeting to document
more than partially:
• We don't hand anything on from one generation to another.
. . . The United States and South Africa are the only
industrialized countries that don't have a national family
policy (BiU Moyers' World, PBS, October 1988).
• The suburban nuclear family of the post-World War II
period was a Cold War invention. When more women were
either working or attending school, one would have expected
less emphasis on family, not more. Home and family,
during the McCarthy period, became a bulwark against
the enemy within and without (from a discussion of
Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War
Era, by Elaine Tyler May, National Public Radio's "All
Things Considered," September 26,1988).
And during the most recent thaw in the Cold War between
the United States and the Soviet Union, the official Soviet news

�FAMILY

agency Tass reported, in a dramatic reversal of longstanding
policy favoring collectivized agriculture, that Russian farmers
now "will be able to rent land from the state in a full-scale return
to family farming..." ("Soviets reversing over a half-century of
state-run farming," Parks. Iff).
Meanwhile, the debate goes on. Facts, figures, studies, and
statistics do not resolve it, or quell the fears about the state of the
American family. An historical perspective on the family, which
includes not only sociological studies but considerations of the
family as it has been depicted in imaginative literature, may
result in the most balanced view. It may be that, as Flaubert
observed, "Our ignorance of history makes us vilify our own age"
(Viking, 237).
Historical perspective is provided by Domestic Revolutions, a
social history of American family life based on scholarship that
has emerged during the past two decades. The authors remind us
that community leaders in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were
deploring the decline of the family, enacting laws with respect to
family discipline in the community, and, on the whole, sounding
much like alarmed voices of the present. Yet the study provides
evidence not so much of the decline of the family as it suggests the
family's stubborn adaptability and persistence (Mintz and Kellog,
et passim).
The historical perspective suggests that while it may be
accurate to say the traditional functions of the family have been
either severely reduced or eradicated, it is also true that in some
instances these traditional functions have been replaced by
others. If the family is no longer a unit of production, it has
become a unit of consumption. Businessmen and economists
note that two-worker families have become a significant new
market force. The family is still a residential unit, even if more
mobile. While the educational and religious functions of the
family have been reduced or eliminated, the family has become
a more important cultural unit. Obviously, the family still performs
its oldest and most constant function—bearing and caring for

9

children (Lerner, 550-52).
It is helpful, also, to go beyond consideration of the conventional
family. Jane Howard distinguishes between two types, those we
are born into and to which we are "connected by blood," and those
we join, which are "invented out of water" (2). In terms of the
American experience, we might distinguish between families
that look inward and backward and appear doomed to repeat the
mistakes of the past (frequently instanced in our history as
Southern) and frontier families that look outward and to the
future. One authority distinguishes at least five different types
of American families. The rural family, the "old family" unit of
social and economic elites, the second- and third-generation
immigrant family, the black family, and the middle class, urban,
small-town, and suburban family (the dominant American form)
are definable American family types, all of which, with the
exception of the black family, can be considered "going concerns"
(Lerner, 552-58).
It should not be surprising that the black family, with its
heritage of slavery and caste in the South, and persisting racism
in the country at large, should evidence a high desertion rate, low
educational attainment, and low income status. And it is all the
more ironic that apologists for slavery stressed the family as a
model for the relationship of slave to master. One such apologist,
Judge John Belton O'Neall, stated that the first law of slavery
was "that of kindness from the master to the slave. . . slavery
becomes a family relation, next in its attachments to that of
parent and child" (Boorstin, 205).
Yet it is an understatement to say that chattel slavery did not
encourage the family. The African immigrant to America, unlike
most other immigrants, was a man or woman without a family.
The practices of slave importers and plantation owners placed
obstacles in the way of blacks attempting to form and maintain
families. Husbands were separated from wives, wives from
husbands, mothers from children. In fact, one of the most
dehumanizing effects of slavery, Boorstin argues, was the

�10

"obstruction and diversion of maternal affection." He quotes E.
Franklin Frazier, author of The Negro Family in the United
States, who writes: "Where such limitations were placed upon
the mother's spontaneous emotional responses to the needs of
her children and where even her suckling and fondling of them
were restricted, it was not unnatural that she often showed little
attachment to her offspring" (Boorstin, 191).
Lower-class and low-income families generally, whether black
or white, tend to be less stable and effective. The romantic notion
that lower-class families are close-knit and happy, while
economically better-off middle class families are less so, does not
comport with the facts. Careful studies reveal that lower-class
families have higher divorce rates, while middle- and upper-class
families have lower ones (Lerner, 558).
A further consideration, as one attempts to understand the
many facts, figures, and statistics available, is that rising divorce
rates in themselves are not necessarily an unambiguous indication
of social conditions. Divorce, as Nevins points out, is a reflection
"of higher independence and self-respect among women" and can
be considered preferable to "a jangling and loveless marriage."
Furthermore, nations with low divorce rates are those in which
"the domination of the husband overrules any incompatibility"
(Nevins, 215-16).
High divorce rates, in themselves, are not evidence of the
"breakdown" of the family. In the United States, the rate of
remarriage after divorce is also high, and this can be taken as a
reaffirmation of the value and viability of the family. Indeed,
with so many of the traditional functions of the family eliminated
or reduced, the supplanting of these traditional functions by new
ones, combined with the high rate of remarriage and family
formation after divorce, can be understood as a positive valuation
of the family. As Lerner suggests, most Americans, despite all the

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

changes in the family and the family situation, continue to find
"their deepest expressiveness in family life." The family is closely
bound up with the American notion of happiness, the pursuit of
which "goes beyond sexual partnership itself and even beyond
the marriage relation, finding its fulfillment in the pattern of
children, home, community status, and warmth of human
relationship which together form the family" (Lerner, 559).
Families broken by divorce, alcoholism, drug and child abuse;
runaway youth; homeless people living in the streets of American
cities—all are grim and undeniable realities. But historical
perspective suggests that they are not unique to our time or
place. During the Victorian era, a period well-known for the
importance attached to home and family, the streets of London
swarmed with more that 50,000 street folk, "scavengers, vagrants,
prostitutes, bone-grubbers, rat-catchers, crossing-sweepers, ragpickers, chimney-sweeps, pie men, and others—the dispossessed
and desperate poor of the slums" (Share, A-15). As Dickens
knew, the best of times and the worst of times may co-exist. As
it was in his day, so it may be in ours.
While the family is beset by many problems, its historic
adaptability and resilience should be taken into consideration,
along with present-day evidences of its continuing viability.
Such evidence may be found in recently reported figures
indicating that a twenty-year trend has been reversed as, between
1986 and 1987, the number of family households grew faster
than the number of non-family households (Waldrop, 22-26).
Similar evidence may be found in the U.S. Census Bureau report
entitled "Who's Helping Out? Support Networks Among American
Families," which reveals that about $19 billion is transferred
annually in the United States as family members help one
another. While most of this money is provided by adults maintaining dependent children, one-third of the amount involves

�FAMILY

adults helping adults—children assisting elderly parents, parents
helping adult children to start a household ("Families aid one
another.../' A-12).
Such evidence suggests that the American family, despite all
its problems, and of whatever type (nuclear, extended) remains
a going concern. Our historical perspective suggests to us that
some of what we consider to be recent family types, such as the
"blended" family, are older than many people realize. Whereas
today blended families are often the result of divorce and
remarriage, in the past they resulted from the death of one of the
parents (often the mother, during or as a consequence of childbirth)
followed by remarriage of the surviving spouse and the blending
of both spouses' children into a single family. Today an older
meaning of the word "family" (blood relatives plus servants
living under one roof) may be paralleled in families that are
communal, or composed of friends rather than relations.
"Nobody, who has not been in the interior of a family," Jane
Austen writes i&amp;Emma (132) "can say what the difficulties of any
individual family may be." One of the advantages of our literary
selections is that they show us the interiors of individual families,
and temper our generalizations with what we know of particular
instances. We learn from her verses how Anne Bradstreet felt
about her children and her husband. We hear Samuel Sewell
telling his son (as Franklin would later write to his son) "something
of the family of which you are." We see Dreiser's Carrie leaving
her family, much as Sherwood Anderson's George Willard leaves
his family and community. We hear Ma Joad, in Steinbeck's The
Grapes of Wrath, reflecting on the Joad family, past and present:
"They was the time when we was on the Ian'. They was a
boundary to us then. OF folks died off, an' little fellas come, an'
we was always one thing—we was the fambly—kinda whole and
clear. An' now we ain't clear no more. I can't get it straight. They

11

ain't nothin'keeps us clear" (536). We can contrast the interior of
this family with that of the Wapshots in John Cheever's The
Wapshot Chronicle, and contrast the sense of family and ancestry
with that of Jules Greene in Joyce Carol Gates' them, who is
described as "a true American. His car was like a shell he could
maneuver around, at impressive speeds; he was second generation
to no one. He was his own ancestors" (357). We can compare the
Appalachian families of Thomas Wolfe's Look Homeward, Angel
and James Still's River of Earth (one small town, one rural) with
those of James Agee's A Death in the Family, Harriette Arnow's
The Dollmaker, Lee Smith's Oral History, and all of these with
the black family of Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun.
And as we are afforded perspectives into the interiors of these
different families, we can remember the observation of Senator
Phil Thurston, in Wilma Dykeman's The Far Family: "If I can
know my family, my folks here well enough, maybe I can
understand people on the other side of the world, too" (333). For
every family is a blend of uniqueness and universality.
The examination of three major works of American literature
affords us three instances of blended uniqueness and universality,
and views of the interiors of three families and their difficulties.
The first of these texts, William Faulkner's The Sound and the
Fury, published in 1929, is a demanding work, no simple reflection
of a cultural value reflected in literature. Instead, the novel
illustrates Everett Carter's idea that great art sometimes comes
"out of the anguish of rejection of a society's central beliefs" (10).
The Sound and the Fury is just such an anguished rejection of one
facet of the American idea—the belief in the family as a source of
nourishment—and an attempt—as Carter states it—"to satisfy
the basic requirement of men: to make order and meaning out of
this universe" (30).

�12

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

The Sound and the Fury

A Death in the Family

by William Faulkner

by James Agee

The Compson family's march to disintegration is relentless
and inevitable. "Ise seed de first and de last," is Dilsey's summation
of the family whose members' lives have been so tightly woven
with her own. Far from being a source of nourishment and
strength, the Compson family members inflict terrible pain on
one another. When asked in a discussion at the University of
Virginia, "What is the trouble with the Compsons?", Faulkner
answered: "They are still living in the attitudes of 1859 or '60."
The character most truly living in the past is Caroline Compson.
Cleanth Brooks notes (334) that "The basic cause of the breakup
of the Compson family ... is the cold and self-centered mother,
who is sensitive about the social status of the family, the Bascombs
... Caroline Compson is not so much an actively wicked and evil
person as a cold weight of negativity which paralyzes the normal
family relationships."
If Caroline is the "weight of negativity" in the novel, Dilsey,
the other mother, is the weight of positiveness. It is Dilsey who
actually holds the family together and whom Faulkner calls "a
good human being."
The breakdown of the family, as seen through the eyes of the
three Compson brothers, Benjy, Quentin, and Jason—and, in a
fourth section, through the eyes of the narrator—is an event
which even Dilsey's presence is unable to alter. Brooks argues
(341) that the breakdown of such a family takes on added
poignancy and significance in a society which is "old-fashioned
and in which the family is still at the center. Because the
Compsons have been committed to old-fashioned ideals—close
family loyalty, home care for defective children, and the virginity
of unmarried daughters—the breakup of the family registers
with greater impact." It is a dissolution which forces one to
separate those past values which cripple and destroy (as exemplified
by Caroline Compson) from those which strengthen and set free
(as exemplified by Dilsey).

The second major work to be studied which deals with the
family as a cultural value is James Agee's A Death in the Family.
Published posthumously in 1957, and in incomplete form, the
novel is an autobiographical reliving of events surrounding the
death of Jay Follet, the father of six-year-old Rufus. The story is
told predominantly in the third person by an author who is both
Rufus, the child, and James Rufus Agee, the adult. The resulting
tone is both childlike and mature, a compelling, bittersweet tone.
The point of view shifts at times to focus more tightly on Jay or
Mary, his wife, or Jay's weak, alcoholic brother Ralph. Yet the end
effect of the work is of an experience seen through the eyes of a
child, and it is this effect which speaks most directly to the theme
of family as a cultural value. It is the family circle, "the simple
relationship of father and son," which is, according to Peter Ohlin
(204), "a defense against the onslaughts of the universe. The
home, located in time and space, is itself an image of order and
meaning projected on nothingness." And in each house on the
same block, down the street, there is the same image of order and
dupKcation—all the fathers water the lawn on a summer evening;
all mothers wash the dishes; all children are sent to bed. It is only
Death which abolishes the wonder of this order and security for
Rufus.
The Follet family, unlike the Compsons, is a nourishing
family. Mary is a loving, conscientious mother, Jay, a vigorous,
strong, father. Rufus and his little sister Catherine variously
tolerate and torment and support each other. What truly engages
the reader of A Death in the Family is more the unsaid than the
carefully detailed and "said" reality of this family. One knows
clearly what the family members have been to each other before
the death of the father. Whether such an environment of love can
be maintained once the family is no longer a traditional unit is a
question Agee skirts with only hints at an ominous future for "the
deceived mother, the false son, the fatally wounded daughter."

�13

FAMILY

In this work, as in The Sound and the Fury, the power—the
sheer psychological power—of the family over its individual
members is incontrovertible. It is an institution capable of
immense devastation. Even though the idea of an American
family as a positive force is more clearly supported in A Death in
the Family than in The Sound and the Fury, the question of
which qualities of family life sustain and which destroy is still
present in Agee's work, though in an incomplete and only hintedat form.

The Dollmaker
by Harriette Simpson Arnow
The final novel to be studied is also the work about which the
least has been written. Yet it is one which Joyce Carol Gates
(Afterword, 601) has called "our most unpretentious American
masterpiece." Harriette Arnow, born in 1908, published The
Dollmaker in 1954. The novel draws upon Arnow's early years in
the Kentucky hills and on her years in Detroit, Michigan after
her marriage. It tells the story of Gertie Nevels' struggle to keep
her family and her dreams intact during the period when she and
her five children move from the woods and hills she so loves in
Kentucky to be with her husband in Detroit, where he has found
wartime work in a factory.
As is the case for the other two novels examined, basic
cultural assumptions about the value of family life form a
backdrop for The Dollmaker. Gertie's mother is horrified that
Gertie would consider staying in Kentucky and buying a small
farm while her husband works in Detroit, where "He ain't got
nobody to cook him a decent bite a victuals." And the Bible says:
"Leave all else and cleave to thy husband." What seems a good,
solid family value becomes a weapon in the hands of Gertie's
mean-spirited mother, and Gertie, conditioned to "honor thy
father and thy mother," is afraid. The events which occur from
this point on are the results of an adherence to what seems a

worthy value—family unity—and yet is one which events and
persons twist and corrupt until what should sustain in fact all
but destroys.
Arnow examines the family uprooted, trapped by economic
and social conditions, but also by a lack of understanding and
communication. Gertie Nevels' ties to the land, her longing to be
whole, her religious faith, her sensitivity to others in the community,
her need to work, to create, are all themes which cross and
overlap in these three works. But most important for the study
at hand, the works each confront the family as an American
institution and seek to identify those experiences which nourish
the family, and separate them from those which destroy.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

14

Works Cited

Franklin, Benjamin. The Autobiography and other Writings. Selected and Edited with an
Introduction by L Jesse Lemisch. New York: New American Library, 1961.

Adams, James Truslow. Provincial Society. Vol. Ill, A History of American Life, Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.

Frost, Robert. The Poetry of Robert Frost. Edited by Edward Connery Lathem. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, 1969.

Austen, Jane. Emma. Edited with an Introduction by David Lodge. TextuaJ Notes and
Bibliography by James Kinsley. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.

Gies, Frances and Joseph. Marriage and Family in the Middle Ages. New York: Harper &amp; Row,
1987.

Bailyn, Bernard. Voyagers to the West. A Passage in the Peopling of America on the Eve of
Revolution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986.

Graham, Sheila. "Who Will Care For My Child?" The Plain Truth Magazine. September 1988:
3-6.

Bartiett, John. Familiar Quotations. Revised and enlarged. Edited by Emily Morison Beck.
Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1980.

Greene, Evarts Boutell. The Revolutionary Generation. Vol. IV, A History of American Life,
Arthur M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company,
1929-48.

Boorstin, Daniel J. The Americans: The National Experience. New York: Random House, 1965.
Broder, David S. "Return to Social Justice." Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal. October 14,
1987:A-9.

Howard, Jane. Families. New York, Simon &amp; Schuster, 1978.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. The Split-Level Family." Saturday Review. October 7,1967:60-66.

Jung, C. G. Contributions to Analytical Psychology. Translated by H. G. and Gary F. Baynes.
New York: Harcourt, Brace &amp; Company, 1928.

Brooks, Cleanth. William Faulkner: The Yoknapatawpha Country. New Haven and London:
Yale University Press, 1963.

Kerr, Michael E. "Chronic Anxiety and Defining Self." The Atlantic Monthly, September 1988:
35-58.

Buckley, William F. The Monogamous Ones." Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal. December
10,1987: A-5.

King Edward VIII. Quoted in the Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal. September 17,1988.

Carter, Everett The American Idea: The Literary Response to American Optimism. Chapel Hill:
The University of North Carolina Press, 1977.

Landers, Ann. "Maybe this marriage is dead!" Bowling Green, Kentucky Daily News. October
25,1987:6-4.
Lerner, Max. America as a Civilization. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957.

Cole, Arthur Charles. The Irrepressible Conflict. Vol. VII, A History of American Life, Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.

"Linguistic change carries significant implications." Memphis, Tennessee Commercial Appeal.
December 6,1986: A-9.

Commager, Henry Steele. The American Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
Daily News (Bowling Green, Kentucky)

MacDonald, Sue. "Dr. Spock changed his tune." The Cincinnati Enquirer. November 7,1987:
D—6-9.

Dreiser, Theodore. Sister Carrie. With an introduction by Claude Simpson Benton. Boston:
Houghton Miff I in, 1959.

Mintz, Steven, and Susan Kellog. Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family
Life. New York: The Free Press, 1988.

Dykeman, Wilma. The Far Family. New York: Holt, Rinehartand Winston, 1966. rpt. Wakestone
Books, 1988.

Monmaney, Terence. "Kids Who Bounce Back." Newsweek. September 12,1988:67.

Elster, Jon, ed. Karl Marx: A Reader. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. Family and Nation. The Godkin Lectures. Harvard University. San
Diego, California: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986.

"Families aid one another to the tune of $19 billion." Associated Press, Louisville, Kentucky
Courier-Journal. October 27,1988: A-12.

Nevins, Allan. The Emergence of Modem America. Vol. VIII, A History of American Life, Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.

Faulkner, Harold U. The Quest for Social Justice. Vol. XI, A History of American Life, Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.

—. "On HarrietteArnow's The Dollmaker" Afterward in The Dollmaker. New York: Avon, 1972.

Fish, Carl Russell. The Rise of the Common Man. Vol. VI, A History of American Life, Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.

Oates, Joyce Carol, them. New York: The Vanguard Press, 1969.
Ohlin. Peter H. Agee. New York: Obolensky, 1966.

�FAMILY

Parks, Michael. "Soviets reversing over a half-century of state-run farming." Louisville,
Kentucky Courier-Journal August 27,1988: Iff.
Rich, Spencer. "The Vanishing Family: A Myth." Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal
Magazine. October 18, 1987:16-19.
Rybczynski, Witold. Home: A Short History of an Idea. New York: Viking Penguin Inc., 1986.
Schlesinger, Arthur M. The Rise of the City. Vol. X, A History of American Life, Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Seldes, George. The Great Thoughts. New York: Ballantine Books, 1985.
Sewell, Samuel. The Diary of Samuel Sewell. Edited and abridged with an introduction by
Harvey Wish. New York: Putnam, 1967.
Share, Allen J. ". . . Homelessness, Still a Problem." Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal.
October 1,1988.
Slosson, Preston W. The Great Crusade and After. Vol. XII, A History of American Life, Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Steinbeck, John. The Grapes of Wrath. Text and Criticism edited by Peter Lisca. New York: The
Viking Press, 1972.
Stone, Lawrence. "A Short History of Love." Harper's Magazine. February 1988:32.
Szas, Thomas. The Second Sin. Quoted in The Oxford Book of Quotations. Third Edition. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Thomas, Mario. "What Is a Family?" Parade. December 6,1987:4-6.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. In Two Volumes, With a Critical Appraisal of
Each Volume by John Stuart Mill. New York: Schocken Books, 1961.
Viking Book of Aphorisms. W. H. Auden and Louis Kronenberger, eds. New York: The Viking
Press, 1962.
Waldrop, Judith. "The Fashionable Family." American Demographics. 10.3 (March 1988): 2226.
Wecter, Dixon. The Age of the Great Depression. Vol. XIII, A History of American Life, Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson. The First Americans. Vol. II, A History of American Life, Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1976.
Wish, Harvey. Society and Thought in America. 2 vols. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.,
1950.

15

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

16

Participant Reflections: Family
A Death in the Family concentrates on a middle-class family
who lives in Knoxville, Tennessee in 1915. It tells, in meticulous
detail, of the death of the father and the family members'
attempts to understand and accept it. The novel opens with the
narrator's reminiscence of his childhood; the summer evening
where everything is peaceful and full of hope. The scene is one of
idyllic blissfulness, and the reader perceives that the family is a
happy one in a happy atmosphere. Yet even in the description of
this perfect setting, there are undertones of tension and impending
doom. For example, Agee describes the family members lying on
a quilt, and the stillness of the bodies resting is a subtle hint of
the repose of death (Moreau, p. 165).
Narisse A. Bravard, "The Effects
of Death as seen in A Death in the
Family"
The family shapes the values and beliefs of its members. It
also provides individuals with a feeling of belonging to a wider
group from which affection and security can be drawn in time of
crisis. Very often it is here—within the family—that siblings
learn to make decisions and assume responsibilities supported
by the advice of close relatives.
James Agee has given us a sense of the tremendous role
played by the Appalachian family and the importance of family
traditions. The Sunday trip into the hills to visit the past
inevitably gives Rufus and Catherine a true sense of identity
that can only be found within the family. The first part of the book
is devoted to establishing a feeling of what it is like to be a family
member.
Patricia M. CoUis, The FoUet
Family As Portrayed in James
Agee's A Death in the Family"

Rufus becomes very much aware of the reality of his father's
death. Painfully he stands before his father's empty chair, smells
it, runs his finger around the ash tray, licks the finger, and tastes
the darkness, the blackness. He then begins to understand more
of what his father's absence will really mean. This scene, when
Rufus suffers such intense loneliness, is in sharp contrast to the
much earlier scene in which he has felt so close to his father when
they went to the movie, stopped at the bar, and then talked as
they sat watching the sun go down.
Wilma G. Snyder, "Alienation of
Children in A Death in the Family
and The Dollmaker"
The idea of entrapment—women trapped in old roles, illusion,
etc.—within the setting or context of the family are ideas that
Lee Smith explores in three stories in Cakewalk—"Between the
Lines," "Artists," and "Cakewalk"—and in the novel Oral History.
In these stories Smith shows that art can "untrap" the artist if
the proper balance between art and life is achieved—merging the
traditional role with an artistic one without destroying either
role.
Tammy Marshall, "The Artistic
Woman in Lee Smith's Fictional
Families"
Novelist Simone de Beauvoir once commented, "One is not
born a woman. One becomes it by an ensemble of civilization."
The "ensemble of civilization" acculturating the American black
woman has had dramatic effects on her role today. She is both
condemned and praised by sociologists and psychologists for
creating and perpetuating a matriarchial stereotype.
The most important things in her life were her children. At
one point Mama Younger said, "Seems like God didn't see fit to
give the black man nothing but dreams—but he did give us

�17

FAMILY

children to make the dreams worthwhile." Mama was willing to
sacrifice anything for her family. She said to Walter, "When the
world gets ugly enough—a woman will do anything for her
family"
Leatrice Pearson, "The Role of the
Matriarchal Figure as Reflected
in The Dollmaker, The Grapes of
Wrath, and A Raisin in the Sun"
What truths do Hamlet, a medieval prince of Denmark, and
Quentin, a suicidal boy from a small Mississippi town, show to
modern American teenagers? They show how painfiil and confusing
it can be to confront the imperfect world without the support of
loving parents; they show the deep agony one's misconceptions
can cause; and finally, they reaffirm life by making one see the
wastefulness of their deaths.
Quentm's orders to act as guardian of the Compson name are
not as explicit as Hamlet's command from the ghost, but they are
nevertheless, as urgent and undeniable to Quentin. Perhaps
Quentin's ghost is not his father but his forefathers—those
mythical adherents to the Southern Code of Honor. These men,
or Quentin's notion of what these men were, compel him to try to
be a man of honor to whom "disgrace alone is a sin."... Quentin
must assume the role of champion of the Compson honor because
his parents, who are physically present but emotionally as
unavailable as Hamlet's, expect it.
Barbara P. Benson, "Hamlet and
Quentin: Brothers in Our Human
Family"
Mrs. Compson allows the chaotic elements of her life to
enslave her. Her neurotic, whining response to everyone and
everything while maintaining a superficial concern with the
appearances of being a "lady" and being a good mother, reveals

a personality that "meets change and misfortunes with neither
fortitude nor grace but with pretentious and self-indulgent
dependence" on others. A victim of her own inner torture and
exaggerated sense of responsibility that she refuses to shoulder,
she projects a distorted Biblical image of herself as the suffering
servant, with all family misfortune and judgment upon herself
.. . while Dilsey achieves personal liberation and fulfillment
through giving the best of herself, a life of love and sacrifice, to a
family caught up in the throes of decay and destruction.
Elizabeth Watson, "And the Truth
Shall Set You Free: A Look at the
Religious Concepts of Gertie in
The Dollmaker, Mary in A Death
in the Family, and Mrs. Compson
and Dilsey in The Sound and the
Fury"
Harriette Arnow's The Dollmaker depicts a Kentucky family
who leave their home and migrate to the industrial city of Detroit
in the 1940s. Although the major portion of the novel deals with
the problems faced by the Nevels family in Detroit, the first nine
chapters convey the strong sense of place associated with the
Appalachian family.
Gertie's identity is shaped not only by her immediate family,
but also by her extended family—the community. In Southern
fiction the nuclear family and the community often function
collectively as kin. In The Dollmaker the community is represented
by the women who come to the post office hoping to hear from
their men who have gone to war. Although Aunt Kate and Uncle
John are relatives of Gertie's, she feels a kinship with the others
as well.
Carolyn C. Cahill, "The Function
of Place in The Dollmaker'9

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

18

Gertie's determination to make sense out of her life in a world
that seems frustrating and incomprehensible to her, a world that
threatens to destroy her family and the values that have held
them together, requires strength and endurance beyond anything
she has had to give before.
Gertie's sacrifice of her beloved carving at the end of The
Dottmoker is not defeat for Gertie but affirmation of her endurance,
representing a type of spiritual catharsis for her. This truly
becomes for Gertie her finest hour. She realizes she must make
a life for her family and herself in Detroit. Through this realization
lies her hope, not a hope for dashed dreams of what might have
been, but a hope for the here and now. The laughing face of Christ
coming down from the hills of Kentucky becomes instead the face
of Victor gently comforting her when Reuben ran away, the face
of Max kneeling over her bed after Cassie's death, the face of Iva
Dean's mother making Clytie a dress for graduation, the face of
Mrs. Huffacre crying at Cassie's funeral. Christ finally comes
alive for Gertie through her experiences with the people of Merry
Hill and the sustaining force of human sharing, a here and now
source of meaning and order for Gertie.
Elizabeth Watson, "And the Truth
Shall Set You Free: A Look at the
Religious Concepts of Gertie in
The Dollmaker, Mary in A Death
in the Family, and Mrs. Compson
and Dilsey in The Sound and the
Fury"

At one point she tells her children, "Jesus walks the earth,
and we're goen to have us a little piece of heaven right here on
earth." Gertie thinks she has realized her dream when she
discovers she has finally saved enough money to buy the Tipton
Place. When Gertie pays Uncle John for the land the author says
of her, "Her foundation was not God, but what God had promised
Moses—land." Unfortunately, Gertie's dream is never to be. Her
husband, Clovis, gets a job in a war plant in Detroit. Gertie's
mother more or less coerces her into moving to Detroit to be with
him. This is seen as Gertie's duty to her husband, even though it
means uprooting the entire family, three sons and two daughters.
So Gertie packs up her children and takes them to Detroit,
desperately hoping that when the war is over they may still
return home and buy the land.
Patricia C. Ramsey, "Judas or
Christ?—Gertie's Struggle to
Believe in Harriette Arnow's The
Dollmaker"

�19

FAMILY

The Theme of Family in Hamlet
and The Sound and the Fury
Barbara Benson
Watauga High School, Boone, North Carolina
One late April day as a class of average and above-average
seniors discussed Quentin's section of William Faulkner's The
Sound and the Fury, I looked up to see a girl in the middle row
crying. Tears were streaming silently down her face. I was not
sure what to do and since no one around her seemed to be taking
notice, I continued with class. Several days later she came by to
tell me that she was sorry she had lost control like that, but that
during our discussion of Quentin's suicidal mind, she had suddenly
understood her father's recent suicide in a new way. She had
realized his loneliness and pain, which until that time, she had
not seen because of her own anger at him for leaving her. The
realism of Faulkner's Compson family members had brought her
to a better grasp of her own troubled family. It had spoken to her
in a very personal way, proving once again the greatness of
Faulkner's novel and the value of great literature.
This incident and many others like it over my years of
teaching high school English have convinced me that numerous
difficult pieces of "classical" literature can be made accessible
and meaningful to modern students if we can show them the
humanity in the literature. One way to do this is to use the
universal theme of family as a doorway through the complexities
of style and character. Two companionable works which lend
themselves to this method are William Shakespeare's Hamlet
and William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury. I have taught
these two works to average and above average high school
juniors and seniors to rave reviews. The two pieces can be done
together or separately with equal success, but the pairing of the
works adds dimension to both.
These pieces both deal with what modern psychologists call
dysfunctional families, the type of families in which many of our

young people today live. Even more significantly, both Hamlet
and The Sound and the Fury are about how the children of these
families cope with the problems existingin their homes. Very few
of my students can fail to sympathize with Hamlet's despair and
anger over his father's death, mother's apparent loose behavior,
and new stepfather's assumption of the roles of father and king.
They feel empathy with Hamlet's confusion and procrastination
as he attempts to handle an adult situation for which he is
obviously unprepared. Similarly, students understand the pain
of Quentin Compson's embarrassment over his alcoholic father's
failure to control the Compson family and the need Quentin has
for his self-centered mother's notice, approval, and nurturing.
They see that Quentin is like the "perfect" children of today who
inexplicably commit violent acts aimed at others or themselves
because they can no longer deal with the private hells they live
in at home. These two works from different centuries and
cultures are timeless because they deal with realistic characters
in realistic families to which our teenagers can relate.
Approached through the theme of family, Hamlet and The
Sound and the Fury are not as difficult stylistically, and therefore,
are not impossible for adolescents to read and enjoy. Admittedly,
the students do need to be made aware of the nature of the
works—of Shakespeare's language and stage conventions, or
Faulkner's experiments in stream of consciousness—but once
they have some assistance, modern students will become immersed
in the people living in these works and not be hampered by the
methods of storytelling. Appalachian students in particular often
find Shakespeare very easy to understand, for, as one student
told me, "My Grandma talks like that sometimes." These young
people have the tradition of the Appalachian dialect which goes
back to Shakespeare's London, and the cadences and word
choices inHamlet are, at times, very familiar to them. Faulkner's
novel, likewise, speaks with a Southern accent and the freeflowing style is easier for young people to master than for those
of us over-schooled in "proper" narrative form. I have had

�20

students who, after being given some significant dates and
events from Benjy's section, read right through it with delight.
One boy even told me he loved that section because he had a
cousin who was retarded and had always wondered how his
cousin thought. After seeing through Benjy's eyes, he believed he
understood his cousin better. Such examples seem to say that we
underestimate the flexibility and intellectual curiosity of our
students by not offering them enough challenges which are not
only demanding but very pertinent to their lives. They all live in
families, and by opening that area of these complex works to
them, we give the pieces a relevance that makes the academic
difficulty of the authors' styles secondary and surmountable.
In addition to offering relevance, Shakespeare's play and
Faulkner's novel fit easily into North Carolina's high school
English curriculums. Hamlet is regularly taught in the British
and Western literature courses offered to high school seniors. The
Sound and the Fury is not often attempted in high school but
could easily be worked into an upper level American literature
course for high school juniors. If a school offers an Advanced
Placement class for seniors, a unit pairing these two works would
be very appropriate and offer enough challenge to help prepare
students for the AP exam. Because students get personally
involved in this unit, they have little difficulty discussing and
writing about these works, giving numerous opportunities for
students to have experience in speaking and writing. Using the
video of the BBC production of Hamlet offers chances to develop

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

viewing as well as evaluation skills. In the past, I have had
classes critique the video production, cast and block their own
production, and present key scenes from Hamlet. In addition,
The Sound and the Fury has a lot of potential for creative writing
experiments. For example, students could write the story from
Caddy's point of view, or add another section to tell what happened
to the Compsons after 1928. They could also discuss this novel as
a possible movie. A very inferior 1957 movie version of The Sound
and the Fury exists. If this movie is available, a movie viewing
and critique session would test the students' own views of how
the book should "look" and explore the difficulty of moving a work
like this to film. Obviously, this unit offers numerous ways to
expand into areas that fulfill goals of the Basic Education Plan
or follow student interest and expertise.
The human family is the first environment for all of us, and
seeing it reflected in the literature they read strikes a deep chord
of recognition for modern students dealing with changing and
sometimes dysfunctional families of their own. They can
understand Hamlet and The Sound and the Fury on a level which
is so powerful that it goes beyond any structural difficulties in the
individual works, and the issues raised by the content of these
classics offer opportunities for very meaningful therapeutic
classroom experiences. My students and I have found this approach
to Shakespeare and Faulkner a wonderful adventure, well worth
the struggles involved. One amazed seventeen-year-old once
remarked as he left class, "This is really awesome stuff!"

�FAMILY

Unit for Average or Above Average High
School Juniors and Seniors:
The Theme of Family in Hamlet
and The Sound and the Fury
I. Study of William Shakespeare's Hamlet
A. Lecture on Elizabethan England, Elizabethan Theater,
and William Shakespeare's life
B. Read Hamlet with discussion of each act focusing on
Hamlet, the son, reacting to a difficult family situation
1. The grieving for Hamlet's dead father
2. The hasty marriage of Hamlet's mother
3. The natural animosity Hamlet would feel toward
his stepfather
4. The lack of political motivation in Hamlet in a very
politically dangerous situation
5. The isolation and confusion Hamlet feels
6. The natural inclination of Hamlet to deal with his
problems in his own head
C. View all or part of the BBC production of Hamlet
starring Derek Jacobi (I have found this video very
useful after students read and discuss.)
D. Discuss major issues in the play in small groups
E. Write essay on the play
II. Study of William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury
A. Lecture on the background of the novel's style
1. Development of the psychological novel in the early
twentieth century
a. Freud's theories on the workings of the mind
b. Henry James' experiments in shifting point of
view in The Turn of the Screw

21

2. Development of the style of writing called "stream
of consciousness"
a. William James' definition of the term
b. James Joyce's experiments in A Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man: indirect interior
monologue
c. Virginia Woolfs experiments in the short story
"The Mark on the Wall": direct interior
monologue
3. Conduct student writing experiments in how the
human mind works
a. Free writing for two minutes for students to
record all thoughts in that period of time, then
brainstorming and listing their observations of
how they think and the problems a writer would
have creating the illusion of a mind working
b. Recording an early memory in three ways, then
deciding which is better for the author, for the
reader
1) Students thinking back to their earliest
memory, holding that image, then summing
it up on paper with one word
2) Students recording the same memory in
three words
3) Students recording the same memory in a
complete sentence
4. Discussing the implications of these descriptions of
memory
a. For many, the single word will be the best
because they can evoke the whole scene for
themselves with that one word due to the fact
that they may have been very limited in their

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

22

verbal ability at the time of the experience
b. The mind is able to store many sensations,
thoughts, memories, and emotions with one key
call word
c. These memories are very sensual
d. The mind flows quickly, often without obvious
connections between ideas
B. Background on Faulkner, and Yoknapatawpha County,
and Compson Family
1. View film strip on Faulkner's life
2. Read and discuss Appendix to 1946 edition of The
Sound and the Fury to get a list of characters and a
feel for Faulkner's Southern, oral-tradition style of
storytelling
C. Reading the novel (I have used study questions at
times to help students see what we would discuss in
the work.)
1. Benjy's section
a. Give information sheet with dates of major
memory events for Benjy and time periods of
caretakers
b. Discuss how these events and caretakers can
clue a reader to time shifts in Benjy's section
c. Read the first few pages of Benjy's section aloud
to class to illustrate how he will narrate
d. After students read the whole section, ask how
they feel about characters and point out how

they are arriving at the judgments on a "gut"
level based on Benjy's experiences
e. Discuss the central scene of the novel, Caddy up
the pear tree, and how it illuminates the roles of
the family members
f. Show Faulkner's use of juxtaposition with
Benjy's memory of his grandmother's funeral
and sister's wedding—two central family rituals
2. Quentin's section
a. Explain the time, place, situation of this section
b. Discuss the differences in how Quentin's mind
will operate as opposed to Benjy's
c. After students read, discuss the events in
Quentin's day in chronological order
d. Point out the allusions and comparisons to
Hamlet in this section
1) Intelligent, educated character
2) Oldest son trying to uphold family honor
3) Isolation of character
4) Absence or unavailability of parents as
comforters
5) Real or pretended madness
6) Suicidal tendencies
3. Jason's section
a. Read opening aloud, noting difference in style
and personality from previous brothers

�23

FAMILY

b. After reading the section, list the activities of
Jason's day in chronological order
c. Discuss his motives in an attempt to judge his
actions
4. Dilse/s section
a. Discuss the shift in point of view
b. After reading, discuss central scenes
1) Dilsey in the kitchen fixing breakfast
2) Dilsey at the Easter service
3) Benjy's trip to the cemetery
c. Discuss the effect and meaning of the whole
book in light of the four versions of the truth
5. Suggest re-reading of BenjVs section to clarify the
novel, put the puzzle together
a. Discuss the different views of Caddy and the
family
b. Try to form a truth from all the evidence, almost
like a family counselor
c. Discuss the whole novel in small groups
III. Culminating activities
A. Using the classical notion of tragedy, discuss these two
works as tragedies which contain universal situations
B. Compare/contrast Hamlet, Quentin, Benjy, Jason, and
Dilsey as possible tragic heroes
C. Write an essay
D. Unit test on the two works

List of Resources
Faulkner, William. The Sound and the Fury. New York: Vintage Books, 1946.
James, Henry. The Turn of the Screw. New York: Dell Publishing, 1966.
Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man:
Text, Criticism, and Notes. Ed Chester G. Anderson. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.5253.

Pasternak, Boris. "Hamlet." Dr. Zhivago. New York: Signet Books, 1958.433.
The Shakespeare Plays: Hamlet Time Life Video.
"William Faulkner." The American Experience In Literature: Five Modem Novelists. Chicago:
Encyclopedia Britannica Educational Co., 1975. (Filmstrip #13095, series #6911.)
Woolf, Virginia. "The Mark on the Wall." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M. H.
Abrams. 5th ed. 2 vols. New York: Norton, 1986. 2:1987-1993.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

24

A Family in Crisis
A Unit of Study of James Agee's
A Death in the Family
Patricia B. Chastain
Powell High School, Powell, Tennessee
Many noted educators, including John Dewey, have stated
that education for any student begins where that student is and
then moves him or her forward to deeper understanding, greater
insights, and fuller knowledge. This high and lofty goal that
many of us accept as we try to "educate" the youth that come into
our classroom presents a special challenge to those of us who
teach literature. For many of us, our literature textbooks contain
selections that "society" and textbook publishers have deemed
appropriate for students throughout the nation, rather that
admitting that America is a land of many regions and cultures.
So many times, these textbooks omit excellent selections that
have regional significance. Someone out there has decided that
these writings would not have universal appeal for the hypothetical
"typical" student. Also, these same publishers are making culturally
biased statements when they include certain pieces and exclude
others. Such acts of exclusion short circuit the teacher's primary
goal of starting where the students are and leading them to a
broader understanding of their culture and life.
A solution to these ommissions is for teachers to find good
pieces of regional literature that start with ideas, situations,
and/or personalities with which the students can identify and
that will, at the same time, acquaint the students with the basics
of literature that may open doors to other books, poems, and
drama.
One such regional work of literature is James Agee's A Death
in the Family. It is a novel, set in East Tennessee, that uses
language familiar to Appalachian students. Agee's autobiographical
novel includes many elements that have made it a key to open
the door of literature to our students.

Our students at Powell High School, located in a small
community formerly known as Powell Station, Tennessee, can
quickly identify with the novel. The road along which Agee's
father (Jay Follet in the novel) was driving when he was killed in
an automobile accident runs near Powell and is one our students
travel. There are, in fact, some people in the community who
remember the accident involving Agee's father. In addition to the
highway, the novel refers to streets and landmarks in Knoxville,
Tennessee, that are also familiar to Powell students.
Even more than the familiarity of locale, the situation of a
family in crisis is one with which many students can relate. In
Agee's novel, the family's crisis is due to a father's death. Although
not many of the students have faced such a loss, they have
experienced or know the effect of the breaking up of a family.
The Follet family's conflicts are real to twentieth-century
students who find similar situations in their own homes. Mary
Follet, Jay's wife, thinks Jay drinks too much alcohol. She does
not approve of his family from a rural county north of Knoxville.
Jay him self is uncertain of his role as father and does not accept
his wife's religious beliefs.
Since A Death in the Family has a quality that appeals to
students, I use it in my American literature classes, both collegebound and advanced placement. Personally, I prefer to discuss it
with the students after they have read the entire novel; however,
such discussions could be conducted after they have read specific
sections of the novel. In class we discuss the elements of fiction
that are present in the novel as well as its themes and subject
matter. These are some of the subjects that have come up in
discussion: conflicts between city folks and country folks,
dissatisfaction with the role of father, and ways of dealing with
grief. We have examined these concerns in relation to other
works of literature and in relation to personal experience. We
have also considered the role the editor plays in the final form of
the literary work. Such consideration is particularly relevant in
A Death in the Family because the final form of the novel is the

�25

FAMILY

work of editors who assembled the novel after Agee's death.
James Agee's A Death in theFamily has been well accepted by
my students, not so much because it is a regional novel, but
because it has touched realities with which they deal daily. In
fact the term regional literature probably is not even a very valid
term. No doubt, it may have been a term that was created by
some publisher or critic who wanted to exclude a piece of literature
that was not part of the canon of "established" works that are
customarily taught to all students.
We teachers must not let unknown editors control the
curriculum that we present to our classes. We must choose
literature that both appeals to our students and conveys to them
a sense of literary merit. Only when we present a broad spectrum
of literature to our students are we likely to catch their attention
and stimulate their interest. Then, perhaps, they will develop
literary and artistic judgment with which to evaluate other
literary works that they encounter.

Outline of Unit of Study
James Agee's A Death in the Family
Class discussions are as follows:
1. Background Information: Include biographical information
on James Agee and the nature of the autobiographical novel.
(1 day)
2. Structure of the Novel: Include the role of the editor. The
concept of unity in the novel is included here. (1 day)
3. Character Analysis: Center on the question: "Does Jay Follet
feel comfortable with the role of father?" The study of characters
also looks at stereotypes within the narrative. (2-3 days)
4. Discussion of Conflict: Deal with internal and external conflicts
and how these are affected by grief. (1-2 days)
5. Analysis of the Theme: Focus on themes of dealing with
conflict and grief and emphasize the universal qualities of the
novel. (1-2 days)
6. Watch the movie A Death in the Family. (2 days)

Suggested Composition Assignments

1. Using &lt;rKnoxville, 1915" as a model, describe your neighborhood
as it is on a warm summer late afternoon and evening. Use a
variety of descriptive words that appeal to all senses.
2. Write a character analysis of Jay Follet, addressing the
question: "Does Jay like, enjoy, or feel comfortable with the
role of father?"
3. Compare the unity and structure of A Death in the Family
with the unity and structure of Wilder's Our Town.
4. Research the psychological ways of dealing with grief and
discuss how these expressions are exhibited by the various
family members in A Death in the Family.
5. A Death in the Family is an autobiographical novel. Research
James Agee's life and compare it to the story he told in his
novel.
6. Write an elegy to the death of Jay Follet.
7. In Chapter 15 of A Death in the Family, Aunt Hannah has
difficulty explaining death to Rufus and Catherine. Write a
story that could be a book for children that teaches about
death.
8. Traditional ballads were created in response to a tragedy in
the lives of common people. Write a traditional ballad about
the death of Jay Follet.
9. Choose an event from your life before the age of 7 and write
it as a story.

Supplementary Bibliography
Bergreen, Laurence. James Agee: A Life. New York: E. P. Dutton, Inc., 1984.
Kramer, Victor A. James Agee. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1975.
Moreau, Genevieve. The Restless Journey of James Agee. Miriam Kleiger, translator. New
York: William Morrow and Company, 1977.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

26

Bringing Characters to Life
Stan Coss
Polk Central High School, Mill Springs, North Carolina
For a special study of the family theme I will be suggesting
not texts, but technique. The classroom itself is something of a
family, and to most effectively use that environment calls for
some special methods.
The traditional classroom is often inhibiting. There are
expressive needs that discussion may not draw out due to a lack
of spontaneity in some class members. There is, however, another
method besides the deliberative essay or term paper for generating
student response; one that may enhance individual participation
and planning: enter the monologue.
Imagine if every child in a family, especially the smallest, had
his or her own say. With no interruptions from more assertive
and impulsive speakers, there would be a tremendous flow of
feelings. Performing provides a magic touch of empathy and
involvement. Normally reticent students, reluctant to speak
their own character, may relish the chance to speak through
another. Performance models can be found throughout literature,
whether it is selected works of Robert Browning or Edgar Lee
Masters' Spoon River Anthology, the soliloquies of Shakespeare
or differing narrators in The Sound and the Fury. These may be
utilized for practice, but for fullest empathy and involvement
students can create their own scripts. Two basic possibilities are
writing a story sequel and writing an alternative scene. If a
student is writing a script for the ears of peers instead of the eyes
of teachers, motivation and interest are increased.
Preparation is the key to confidence and one of the most
important steps in studying the character of a story is to find
specific characteristics. These are normally not explicit, but can
be drawn from observing how other characters respond to this
person or how he/she thinks and behaves. Faulkner sketched
some notes in reference to Jason's future. Even without such

help, there are a number of colorful characters in the work who
lend themselves to sequel portrayals. The following general
traits can be focused on: l)physical characteristics such as age,
appearance, build, dress, and health; 2) the social aspects of
occupation, hobbies, relations with family and friends, and
wealth; 3) psychological qualities such as temperment, adjustment,
and way of behaving; and 4) moral characteristics including
values and desires and goals in life.
The monologue is a basic performing medium and could be a
starting point for classroom exercises. It can be diversified to
include dialogue and multiple parts. Students may combine their
participation in a readers theater. The suggestions here are
certainly not new. The point is that many students may be less
frustrated and more challenged by taking on a stint as an actor,
by acting out some of their own concerns with a voice they cocreated.
The harsh ending of The Dollmaker, unlike the Fonda film
version, demands an examination of values and judgments.
Producing and performinga script could be ameans of addressing
these concerns. In an alternative scene or sequel, the student
may explore the cutting up of the block of wood as an act to save
the family or the soul or an act to lose one or both. The following
excerpt is from a scene in which Mrs. Anderson is confronting her
husband about Gertie's tragedy in an attempt to reach a new
resolve in her own life.

Judas or Christ—A Logical Choice?
"Well!" said Mr. Anderson, hanging up his overcoat. "Did you
pick up the little wooden dolls for the bazaar?"
"Yes, Homer. Fm afraid so," replied Mrs. Anderson, not looking up from her perch on the couch, secured behind a coffee table.
"What? Do you mean they were not up to standard?"
"Standard?" said Mrs. Anderson. "Oh, you needn't worry. The
Nevels' production line would make your people at Flint very
pleased."

�FAMILY

27

Hilllam Leonard Eurj
Collection

"Glad to hear it, dear." Homer could tell his wife was far from
being glad or pleased, and he preferred not to pursue it. He
headed into the hallway.
Mrs. Anderson, catching herself just short of a scream,
followed. "Well it's not so simple! Today I went to Gertie's, mostly
because I was hoping the block of wood was finished. I'd seen it
so elegant two weeks ago, only lacking the face. The body already
posed, with hands gesturing like Judas. Now it turns out that I
was the one paying the thirty pieces of silver!" Her face was
buried in her hands.
"I'm not sure what this is all about," said Mr. Anderson, wideeyed, his neck craned, peering around the hallway door. "But I'm
sure it's nothing to get so worked up about."
"Maybe not," she stiffened, "but it is something critical to my,
ah, my sense of relativity. That psychology book you had me read
last week would recommend an observer's reaction. You're it."
"Now dear, I..."
"Sit, Homer! Please, sit."
As Homer shuffled uncomfortably over to the easy chair at
the end of the couch, Mrs. Anderson pointedly thrust an object
toward him. He reacted as though he were about to be stabbed
and fell back into the chair.
Normally, such a slip would have stirred up at least a snicker,
but this time Mrs. Anderson only frowned. "It won't hurt you,
Homer."
"Oh, it's one of the little dolls," he sighed in relief. He tried
earnestly to regain his dignity, with a serious stance, exaggerated
even for him. "Its bright, simple features rather enhance its
overall appeal, don't you agree?"
"Cute's the word," snapped Mrs. Anderson.
"It's nice enough," continued Homer in earnest, "though not
as unique as her past work. Most people could probably come up
with something similar, given ample time."
With strained sincerity, Mrs. Anderson responded, "But isn't
that the wonder of mass production?"

"Yes! An object is simplified as much as possible and copies
can be produced rapidly with a minim urn of human effort."
"Just a thought..." added Mrs. Anderson. "Didn't you write
that stereotypes are formed in much the same way? Could it be
there is a link between rising industrialism and lessened
individuality, dignity, artistry?"
"Now see here," said Mr. Anderson, rising sharply from his
chair. "I've been set up!"
Mrs. Anderson remained on the couch, musing over the
wooden doll. "I wanted only to set Gertie up comfortably... so she
could have some work while Clovis was out on strike. The order
for all the dolls, the payment, something overwhelmed her.
Gertie had never taken the easy way. She'd always labored
painstakingly over what she valued, especially on the block of
wood. I asked her today if she'd been unable to find a face for it.
She told me she could have found plenty of models good enough
were it to be Christ. 'Millions of models,' she said, 'a regular
assembly line.'"
"I get it. The block is where this doll comes from!" Mr.
Anderson concluded. He sat with a smug grin. "It seems a logical
choice."
This sort of creative project can explore values and relationships
encountered through an assigned piece of literature or through
a student's personal choice of a story. Questions to explore
relating to the theme of family include: What influence does a
parental character have in the main character's life? What sort
of parent would the character make? What was this person like
as a child? Are the relationships portrayed healthy or hindering?
What has become of the family ten years later? The student can
take such ideas and play them out as the character, bringing
them to life.

Resources

Galati, Frank and Charlotte Lee. Oral Interpretation. Atlanta: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1977.
Long, Beverly Whitaker and Mary Francis Hopkins. Performing Literature. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1982.

�28

�Community
Enemies Yoked
Where are Hester, Arthur, Roger, Henry, Carol, and Will,
The village martyr, the weak-willed minister, the lonely
opportunist, the agrarian experimenter, the would-be
reformist, the practical, hometown doctor?
All, all are sleeping now,
Dust returned to dust,
Ashes to ashes.
One caught in shameful adultery,
One rankled by a tragic flaw,
One who sacrificed his soul to conquer another,
One who lived a simple life with nature,
One who determined to fulfill her vision,
One caught in the status quo,
All, all are sleeping now,
Peaceful in death if not in life.
One an enemy to conformity,
One an enemy to himself,
One an enemy to God's laws,
One an enemy to society's institutions,
One an enemy to ugliness and bigotry,
One an enemy to social upheaval,
Yoked to the community, to the land,
To ambitions both thwarted and fulfilled.
All, all are sleeping now.
Listen to the secrets of the soul.
Elizabeth Watson

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

30

"Members of Each Other": Community in
American Life and Literature
For we must consider that we shall be a city upon a hill.
The eyes of all people are upon us, so that if we shall deal
falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and
so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we
shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world.
from "A Model of Christian Charity*
(1630), a sermon by John Winthrop,
Governor of the Massachusetts Bay
Colony, delivered aboard the Arbella

In the ninth book of Homer's Odyssey, Odysseus tells King
Alcinous of his adventures among the Cyclops, that race of giants
with one huge eye in the center of their foreheads. The Cyclops'
physical features are not so astonishing to Odysseus as are their
social arrangements. They have "neither gatherings for council
nor oracles of law, but they dwell in hollow caves on the crests of
high hills... and they reck not one of another." Without laws or
deliberative gatherings, and without concern for one another,
the Cyclops do not live as members of a community.
The Greeks found life outside apolis, or city-state, uncivilized.
A person who lived to himself, like a Cyclops, unconcerned about
his fellow man, uninvolved in things affecting the community,
was simply ignorant, i.e. an idiotes (hence the English "idiot").
Aristotle in his Politics (Barnes, 1986) explains:
Every state is a community of some kind, and every
community is established with a view to some good; for
everyone always acts in order to obtain that which they
think good. But, if all communities aim at some good, the
state or political community, which is the highest of all,
and which embraces all the rest, aims at good in a greater
degree than any other, and at the highest good.
Implicit in Aristotle's concept of the state as the highest form of

community, which subsumes all smaller and lower forms, is the
concept of the common good—that which benefits all members of
the polity. Francois N. Babeuf (Bartlett, 414-15), the French
revolutionary activist, formed a Conspiracy of Equals aimed at
"something more sublime and equitable—the common good, or
the community of goods."
Especially since the American and French revolutions of the
late eighteenth century, leaders, social philosophers, economists,
educational theorists, and others have been necessarily concerned
with the relationship of the individual to the community, and
with the rights and responsibilities of both. Freud (III.287)
considered it the chief task of every individual, from the onset of
puberty, to cease to be a child and to become a member of a social
community. In the fourteenth chapter of The Moon and Sixpence
the English novelist William Somerset Maugham defines
conscience as "the guardian in the individual of the rules which
the community has evolved for its preservation." Maugham's
countryman Bertrand Russell (176) admits the "abstract right of
the community to interfere with its members in order to secure
the biological necessaries to all," but he does not think this right
applies to such things as opinion and knowledge. "The fact that
the majority of a community dislikes an opinion gives it no right
to interfere with those who hold it."
From the time of the founding fathers, American leaders,
thinkers, and writers, in a tradition derived from our GrecoRoman and Judeo-Christian heritage, have pondered the political,
social, economic, and ecological aspects of community. John
Quincy Adams viewed the community as an aggregation of
individuals. "Individual liberty is individual power," he wrote in
a letter to James Lloyd on October 1,1822, "and as the power of
a community is a mass of individual powers, the nation which
enjoys the most freedom must necessarily be in proportion to its
numbers the most powerful nation." In a speech delivered in
1910, Theodore Roosevelt (687) invoked the concept of the
common good when he said: "Every man holds his property

�COMMUNITY

subject to the general right of the community to regulate its use
to whatever degree the public welfare may require it.* Reversing
the assumption implicit in Theodore Roosevelt's view of property
rights, Aldo Leopold (x), the environmentalist, asks us to consider
not only that land may belong to us, as property, individually and
communally, but that we belong to the land. "We abuse land,"
Leopold writes, "because we regard it as a commodity belonging
to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we
may begin to use it with love and respect." There are ecological
and environmental implications to economist John Kenneth
Galbraith's observation, in chapter seventeen of The Affluent
Society, that "Just as there must be a balance in what a community
produces, so there must also be a balance in what the community
consumes." Judge Learned Hand (284) considered a healthy
community as one capable of tolerating dissent, and maintained
that a "community is already in the process of dissolution where
each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where
non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as
religious, is a mark of disaffection . .. where orthodoxy chokes
freedom of dissent.. ."And Franklin D. Roosevelt (781), in his
fourth and final inaugural address in January 1945, emphasized
the concept of community from the international perspective.
"We have learned that we cannot live alone, at peace; that our
well-being is dependent on the well-being of other nations, far
away. We have learned that we must live as men, and not as
ostriches, nor as dogs in the manger." Alluding to the assertion of
Socrates (who taught Aristotle's teacher, Plato) that he was not
an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world, Roosevelt
concluded: "We have learned to be citizens of the world, members
of the human community."
The word "community" has been in the English language
since the fourteenth century, and is understood in a number of
senses. Deriving from the French comunete, and ultimately from
the Latin communis, meaning "common," the word from its
earliest use referred to the common people as distinguished from

31

people of rank. Additionally, "community" denoted a state or
organized society, especially a relatively small one. It further
referred to the people of a district, as well as (from the sixteenth
century on) the quality of holding something in common, as in
expressions such as "community of interests," "community of
goods," and a sense of common identity and characteristics. Since
the nineteenth century, "community" has come to mean something
more immediate and local than "society," with which it was once
almost synonymous. In the late nineteenth century the sociologist
Toennies introduced two German terms to distinguish between
"community" as something direct, immediate, and local—
Gemeinschaft—and an entity felt to be larger and more inclusive,
such as a nation state or society—Gesellschaft (Williams, 65-66).
But whether we understand community as something local
and immediate, or all-embracing and abstract, we Americans,
from our colonial beginnings onward, have been engaged in a
series of experiments aimed at discovering a satisfactory
accommodation between individual and community. American
history is commonly interpreted as "a story of creative tension
between two impulses, an insistence on a vast scope for
individualism and a yearning for a sense of community" (Will,
62). These two impulses may be seen in the differing views of
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, as they emerge in the
correspondence of these two men (Cappon, Vol. 2, 342-43).
Jefferson is optimistic and confident of the ability of citizens to
elect their leaders, to better themselve through education; Adams,
on the other hand, is skeptical, not at all certain that human
beings, by exercising their rational powers, are capable of
determining those most capable of governing, or of bettering
themselves through education. Jefferson's views and those of
Alexander Hamilton differed in a similarly sharp manner, with
Jefferson essentially optimistic, and Hamilton pessimistic, dubious
of the ability of the people to rule, as Judge Learned Hand (66ff)
points out. These differing views of human nature and human
capability result in different visions of appropriate government,

�32

and therefore are to be associated with our two dominant
political parties.
Many voices, expressing different visions, speak out of our
history. Sometimes these voices stress our identity and our rights
as individuals, sometimes our desire and need for community.
Henry David Thoreau expresses the impulse to individualism
when he writes in the conclusion to Walden: "If a man does not
keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a
dififerent drummer." Yet on the eve of the revolution that secured
Thoreau's opportunity to march to a different drummer, Benjamin
Franklin (348) stressed community when he said: "We must all
hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
The earliest colonists came as members of religious
communities, with the intention of perpetuating those
communities. "From the beginning," Daniel Boorstin (65) writes,
"communities existed here before there were governments to
care for public needs or to enforce public duties." Before setting
foot on land, the men who crossed on the Mayflower signed an
agreement to create a body politic in which majority rule would
decide all questions and issues. This Mayflower Compact can be
seen as a prototype of later efforts by colonists. In 1630 John
Winthrop's sermon, "A Model of Christian Charity," was
preached on board ship before the members of the Massachusetts
Bay Colony debarked, andimplies a deliberate and self-conscious
effort to establish a community.
Boorstin (1) asserts that "America grew in the search for
community." New Englanders, more so than the people of the
southern colonies, saw their communities as centers of change.
Any idea for bettering the community was welcomed, and New
England public life came to be characterized by an abundance of
reform movements (43). In 1840 Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote to
Thomas Carlyle about the many social experiments that had
become fashionable in New England: "Not a reading man but has
a draft of a new community in his waistcoat pocket," Emerson
observed. "One man renounces the use of animal food; and

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

another of coin; and another of domestic hired service; and
another of the State" (Shapiro, October 30 entry). Thoreau's
efforts to wake his neighbors up took place in this ferment of New
England reform movements and social experiments. Thoreau
was a seeker of community no less than many of his fellow New
Englanders and other fellow Americans. While his stay at Walden
Pond might suggest that he wished to withdraw from any
community, it must be stressed that Thoreau sought not the
abolition of community, but a better community, one which was
a means to greater fulfillment of the individual.
The continent was explored and settled not so much by
individuals as by people moving communally. The settlement
was carried out, in large part, by rootless people in search of
community. Just as colonists crossed the ocean as a community,
settlers crossed the continent in organized groups. As settlement
progressed westward, group after group recapitulated the
experience of the Mayflower pilgrims, and formed "a kind of
Mayflower Compact" for the journey (Boorstin, 66). As towns
sprang up, businessmen became community-makers and
community leaders (115-16), the Benjamin Franklins of the West
(123). Eventually communities competed with one another, for
designation as the state capital, or (as they do today) for the
location of a business or industry (Boorstin, 162). The colleges
that were established in connection with this westward movement
and settlement, Boorstin maintains, were actually neither public
nor private, but a distinctly American community institution
(160). Such was, according to Boorstin, the pattern ofcommunitymaking everywhere in America except in the South. In New
England, and later elsewhere in America, things as they were
tended to be measured by how they ought to be; whereas in the
South things as they ought to be tended increasingly to be
identified with things as they were (212).
The difference between the dynamic communities of New
England and the American West, and those of the South are
explained not only by the South's "peculiar institution," slavery,

�COMMUNITY

but by differences in topography and settlement patterns. A
distinctive feature of New England life was the town and its
meetinghouse, where people met as a community to deal with
public affairs. The population of the South was, by comparison,
dispersed across the land. People lived in the midst of fields they
cultivated; the town meetinghouse was not a distinctive feature
of the Southern landscape, as in New England (Wertenbaker, 85).
Yet this is not to say that no sense of community existedin the
South. In the South and border South, where frontier conditions
persisted longer than in New England and other parts of the
country, people lived communally even when they resided at
considerable distances from one another, and community mores
and public opinion operated effectively.
The historian Everett Dick, in The Dixie Frontier (302-03),
provides an illustration:
Such was the primitive simplicity [in frontier communities]
that there were no locks. The first lock in one community
was bought by a farmer and attached to the door of his
corn-crib. This aroused such indignation among the whole
neighborhood that a mass meeting compelled him to
remove it. Public opinion held that his action was a
reflection upon the honesty of the neighborhood, an insult
to the whole community. It was freely acknowledged that
he had a per feet right to lock things from his own children
in his house, but to turn a key in the face of the whole
community was an affront that would not be brooked.
In the stories we tell ourselves about the American frontier
and settlement experience, the rugged individualist occupies
center stage. Far more important than the lone frontiersmen,
however, were "the obscure men and women who tilled the
farms, founded homes, and built ordered communities" (Greene,
177). Our impulse to individualism has always existed, and has
been pointed out, in tension with an antithetical impulse toward
community. "For all his individualism," Henry Steele Commager

33

(22) writes in The American Mind, "the American was much
given [in the years between 1880 and 1950] to cooperative
undertakings and to joining... Athousand organizations sprang
up—organizations to do good, to prosper business, to influence
politics, to recollect the past, to mold the future, to conquer
culture. . . [These organizations were] an effort to give an
appearance of stability to an unstable society, to create order out
of disorder, to substitute new loyalties for those which had been
dissipated and new conventions for those which had been lost, to
enlarge horizons and inflate opportunities." During these years,
too, mainline American churches shifted from an emphasis on
individual salvation to one of providing for the social needs of the
community (170-71).
Yet all this evidence of community-building, as Commager
suggests, presented an appearance that belied the reality upon
which it was founded. Tocqueville (Vol. 2,236) in his Democracy
in America, shrewdly observed, in the first third of the nineteenth
century, a difficulty with respect to democratic communities.
"Democracy loosens social ties," he wrote, "but it draws the ties
of nature more tight; it brings kindred more closely together,
whilst it places the various members of the community more
widely apart."
T. K Whipple (32-33) in Study Out the Land, elaborates on
what Tocqueville condenses into a single proposition. Americans
were a nation of immigrants from other lands, Whipple reminds
us, and he is interested in the psychology of people uprooted from
old European communities and transplanted into the American
reality. Such a man cannot possibly have the same bond with the
soil that his ancestors had in the old community. Such a man's life
is necessarily "to some extent impoverished, even though he may
be quite unconscious of the deprivation... He once had a close
and vital tie with the world about him, and now he has little or
none, except as a source of livelihood. His treatment of the soil,
his ruthless exploitation of it, and his willingness to leave it and
move on will be measures of his lack of feeling."

�34

Here Whipple describes the same rootlessness and mobility
that Boorstin deals with in The Americans: The National
Experience, but he is less sanguine about this feature of the
American experience than is Boorstin—at the same time that he
helps explain why Tocqueville thought democracy loosened social
ties and placed members of the community "more widely apart."
The transplanted alien, Whipple continues, may settle among
other aliens, "aliens to each other as well as to him; and a number
of strangers, however friendly and kindly, cannot soon coalesce
into a close-knit community. The circumstances described in
Roelvaag^s Giants in the Earth provide an example of just such a
community. Even supposing a whole community migrates in a
body—as often was the case, as we have seen—the communal life
cannot go on as it had previously (Whipple, 33). And the history
of such transplanted communities again and again shows that
they inevitably and necessarily change as they adapt to new
conditions and demands, and more often than not, dissolve. The
community of New Plymouth was absorbed into Massachusetts
in 1691, by which time the theocratic elements of the community
had been drastically reduced. While the Pilgrims had pooled
their resources to purchase the Mayflower, and began as
communists, sharing land and labor, young men of the community
soon began to object to working for other men's families, resented
their wives having to work for others, and the provident and
industrious rankled at receiving no more reward than the shiftless.
The communistic experiment collapsed, as did many that would
follow it. The Plymouth Colony's second governor William Bradford
(120-21; cf. also Wish, 27-28) cited the failure of the experiment
as proof that the arrangement was contrary to human nature.
As Whipple reminds us, the twin impulses of individualism
and community, in combination with unrestricted freedom,
abundant land and natural resources, has not led Americans to
the New Jerusalem they set out to find. While statute books and
the courts far into the nineteenth century reflected distrust of
unregulated economic life, and while Utopian experiments, mass

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

education, abolitionism, and trade unionism through the eras of
Jackson and Lincoln also expressed a belief in cooperation in
preference to untrammeled economic freedom, entrepreneurship,
and root-hog-or-die competition (Wish, v. 1, 574-75), the actions
of Americans fell conspicuously short of expressed ideals. We
have too often been "Jefiersonian in talk, Hamiltonian in practice,"
as some individuals have received a charter to exploit the public
in the name of freedom of enterprise. Economic power has easily
translated into political power. A way of life and a set of values
"which seemed ideal to a set of loose rural communities . . .
betrayed us in the conditions of a new age..." (Whipple, 119).
The process of change from a predominantly rural and
agricultural to an urban and industrial society quickened in the
post-Civil War period. According to Henry Steele Commager (44),
from the mid-1880s to the Spanish War:
The new America came in as on flood tide. These years
witnessed the passing of the old West, the disappearance of
the frontier line and of good, cheap farm land, the decline
of the cattle kingdom, the completion of the transcontinentals
... They revealed a dangerous acceleration of the exploitation
of natural resources; the seizure of the best forest, mineral,
range, and farm land by corporations; and the beginnings
of the conservation and reclamation movement. They were
marked by a profound and prolonged agricultural malaise
and the transfer of economic and political gravity from
country to city.
The new America caused students of American life to reexamine the American character, values, and traditional
community. Sherwood Anderson (247), in Winesburg, Ohio, a
collection of interrelated stories subtitled "The Book of the
Grotesque," examined the dark underside of small-town American
life. Representative of the thousands of young people who left
rural areas and small towns for life in large cities during the late
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Anderson's protagonist

�COMMUNITY

George Willard leaves Winesburg at the end of the book, and the
community in which he has grown up becomes "but a background
on which to paint the dreams of his manhood." Edgar Lee
Masters' Spoon River Anthology (91), a sort of Main Street in
verse, presents a gallery of village and small-town failures—
disillusioned and broken lawyers, would-be artists and poets,
druggists, dentists, doctors, farmers, housewives, bankers, village
atheists, and dissenters—all stunted by the narrowness and
mediocrity of their community, suffering under the community's
hypocrisy, racism, and injustice and anti-intellectualism and
narrowness. Spoon River rarely proves nurturing and supportive
of the promise and potential of the community's individual
members. More often it proves a dark cellar, as Mrs. Charles
Bliss explains after she and her husband have been advised by
the village preacher and judge to remain in a loveless marriage
"for the sake of the children":
Now every gardener knows that plants grown in cellars
Or under stones are twisted and yellow and weak.
And no mother would let her baby suck
Diseased milk from her breast
Yet preachers and judges advise the raising of souls
Where there is no sunlight, but only twilight,
No warmth, but only dampness and cold—
Preachers and judges!
The critical examination of community and the American
experience continues to this day. On the one hand we find
expressions of discontent with narrow, stifling communities such
as Winesburg, Ohio, and Spoon River, communities which oppress
the individual. On the other hand, a widely held view is that
values and attitudes suited to a former time, when the frontier
was open and natural resources were apparently limitless, have
persisted into a time when those conditions no longer apply. The
result has been reckless and irresponsible behavior destructive
of community and the common good. In the post-World War I

35

period R Scott Fitzgerald (225-26) described Tom and Daisy
Buchanan, the principle characters in The Great Gatsby, as "...
careless people [who] smashed up things and creatures and then
retreated to their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever
it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the
mess they had made." Many students of American life saw these
characters and their attitudes and actions as representatives of
American attitudes and actions generally. They typified individual
aims, goals, and desires operating to the detriment of the communal
good.
The Great Depression of the 1930s forced a temporary return
to emphasis on the common good. (In our survey of the famiy we
have seen how American families became more closely knit
during the Depression.) James Still (8-9), in his classic novel of
the Appalachian South, River of Earth, depicts a family in the
process of closing ranks in the face of economic setback. The
mother says to her family: "We've got to live small... We've got
to tie ourselves up in such a knot nobody else can get in." During
these years President Franklin D. Roosevelt succeeded in causing
the entire nation, for the first time in its history, to think of itself
as a single community with a common problem to overcome, and
to pull together much as the family in Still's River of Earth drew
itself into a knot in a time of great need.
But the Great Depression also served to intensify the reexamination of the American character and American values set
in motion by the new America, which came on like a flood tide in
the 1880s. In 1950 Harry Riesman contributed to this reexamination—which continues to this day—with The Lonely
Crowd, a book whose title suggested a felt absence of genuine
community in America In the 1980s Robert Bellah, in collaboration
with five other authors, produced a study entitled Habits of the
Heart, which stands, along with The Lonely Crowd, in a tradition
going back to Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America, from
which the title Habits of the the Heart is derived.
Bellah and his co-authors identify four personalities that

�36

have emerged during the course of American history; these
personalities embody values and attitudes with profound
implications for the concept of community in American life.
Exemplified by the Puritan leader John Winthrop, by Thomas
Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and the nineteenth-century poet
Walt Whitman, these personalities represent, respectively, Biblical,
republican, utilitarian individualist, and expressive individualist
values. Bellah and his associates conclude that Biblical and
republican personalities, and the concepts of the good life they
embody (chief among them being civic virtue), live on in the
American experience, but they have lost ground to the utilitarian
individualism represented by Franklin and to the expressive
individualism represented by the life and work of Whitman.
These two individualisms, in combination with a growing
psychotherapeutic approach to self, are not conducive to the
growth and maintenance of community. Bellah, et. al. find that
the utilitarian and expressive individualisms embraced by the
majority of Americans prevent us from recognizing the complex
interdependence our society now requires of us. Believing that
the greatest good is either to win, to "make it" financially or
professionally, or to develop our individual selves to the greatest
degree possible, we have an undeveloped appreciation for
community and the public good, and tend to behave collectively,
much as do Tom and Daisy Buchanan, with a "vast carelessness"
for the communal or public implications of our behavior. Too
many Americans, Bellah and his colleagues believe, live like
Homer's race of Cyclops, who dwelt apart with little concern for
one another.
The sense of community implicit in John Winthrop's "city on
a hill," and the civic virtue, which is the essence of Jefferson's
social and political philosophy, are conspicuously absent in
contemporary America, according to this critique, and in their
place we have brands of individualism that tell us something is
good if it works (utilitarian individualism), or if it feels right
(expressive individualism), together with an attitude which

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

says, "These are my values, but they don't have to be anyone
else's." The authors of Habits of the Heart find that this attitude
has so permeated American life that many newly formed
"intentional" communities are nothing more than "lifestyle
enclaves," and even the most intimate human relationships,
such as marriage, are thought of as contracts negotiated for the
mutual benefit of autonomous individuals (Bellah, 85-86,93-97,
et passim; and the Glossary of Key Terms, which defines "Biblical
tradition," "community," "community of memory," "expressive
individualism," "republican tradition," "lifestyle enclave,"
"utilitarian tradition," and other key terms used in the book).
Such a conclusion is suggested by Frances Fitzgerald's Cities
on a Hill: A Journey Through Contemporary American Cultures.
Fitzgerald examines four contemporary efforts, in a tradition
dating back to the Plymouth Colony, to establish and maintain
communities dedicated to a single ideal or lifestyle. Two of these,
the Castro in San Francisco, and the Rajneeshpuram commune
in Oregon, grow out of the spirit of the 1960s, and were established
on the ideas of the Gay Rights movement and New Age spirituality,
respectively. A third, the Reverend Jerry Falwell's Liberty Baptist
Community, is seen as a reaction to the alternative lifestyle of the
Castro. And a fourth community, the Sun City retirement village
in Florida, was an entire town made up of older Americans who
enjoyed good health, were affluent, and had made a conscious
decision to live apart from their families.
All four communities can be seen as standing in an American
Utopian tradition, dating from the earliest colonists, in which
people form into a group for the purpose either of escaping
mainstream society or providing an example to that society, or
both. And like earlier communities in this tradition, each of these
has either failed, changed significantly from its original conception,
or succeeded only to a modest degree. Like previous communities,
these at first attempted to impose their vision on the larger
society, then necessarily changed as the enthusiasms of the
members waned, or as the communities' ideals confronted the

�COMMUNITY

realities of existing within the larger society. At first the Castro
was idealistic and uninhibited. Then one of the community's
most influential supporters, a member of the San Francisco
Board of Supervisors, was assassinated, an event which fragmented
the gay community; and soon thereafter the AIDS epidemic,
closely associated with the gay community in San Francisco,
began to attract the attention of the nation.
The Reverend FalwelTs Liberty Baptist Community originally
provided its members with a world apart from the society at
large, but, especially after the community established Liberty
University, it became increasingly clear that Bible-based truth
alone was not adequate preparation for life in late twentiethcentury America.
The Rajneeshpuram in Oregon at first was held together by
the fervor of its members and by its charismatic leader the
Bhagwan, but from the beginning the community was at odds
with Oregonians living nearby. The leaders of the commune
eventually betrayed one another (one disappeared with community
funds, another testified against other community leaders during
court proceedings), the Bhagwan was deported, and the community
fell apart.
Sun City continues as a retirement village, but its members
face a rather bleak and lonely future which falls far short of the
community's original promise of happiness and companionship.
The four communities examined by Fitzgerald resemble the
many similar experiments which have preceded them in American
history not only in the way they fall short of their original
expectations. They resemble earlier experiments also in that the
very rootlessness of so many Americans now, as then, engenders
the motivation to create community. And so community
experiments of the past quarter century can be seen as the work
of rootless people in search of community. As long as there are
Americans who have made a break with the past, who have no
strong attachments to kin or place, and who are free to move or
start over, we may expect to see this strand of utopianism in the

37

collective American experience.
An analysis of the American experience and social reality
which to some degree parallels that of Bellah and his co-authors
is Robert Reich's (8-13) Tales of a New America. Reich identifies
four American morality tales, stories rooted in the American
experience, which we tell ourselves in the attempt to make sense
of our lives. One story Reich calls "The Mob at the Gates," which
conceives of America as "a beacon light of virtue in a world of
darkness," a country "uniquely blessed, the proper model for
other people's aspirations, the hope of the world's poor and
oppressed." This view of America, foretold in John Winthrop's
sermon, "A Model of Christian Charity," is an example of what
Bellah refers to as the Biblical tradition in American life; it
requires a sense of community, but it also contains the seeds of
paranoia concerning those who are outside the gates.
The second story is that of "The Triumphant Individual" and
is told, early on, in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin,
which has become paradigmatic of the American success story. It
is the story of the individual of humble beginnings who works,
risks, and eventually wins wealth, fame, and honors. The story
of the self-made man or woman, it suggests that anyone with a
modicum of wit, grit, and determination can "make it." Recent
versions of this story are Rocky and/acocca.
Reich's third story is that of "The Benevolent Community."
In this story American neighbors and Mends roll up their
sleeves, pitch in, and help one another. It is a story of selfsacrifice, community pride, and patriotism. This story helps
explain the effort in the nineteenth century to emancipate
slaves, to gain the vote for women, and in the 1960s to help
American blacks and other minorities secure civil rights. With
this story we associate New England meetings where issues
affecting the whole community were debated; house- and barnraisings on the frontier, participated in by the whole community.
This story accounts for Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, Truman's
Fair Deal, and Johnson's Great Society, slogans summarizing

�38

policies that asked Americans to think of the entire nation as a
single community; which asked the many to pull together as one.
With this story we tell ourselves that we are a generous people
with concern for our neighbors and fellow citizens; that we work
to make opportunity available to all; that we are all one big
family, one large community.
Reich's fourth story is called "The Rot at the Top." This story
is about evil elites, rich aristocrats, unscrupulous and greedy
business leaders and government officials. It is a story about
those who conspire to work against the common good. With this
story we associate casting off the yoke of arbitrary power during
the American Revolution; the formation of labor unions to offset
concentrations of economic power in vested interests.
But, like all stories, these four stories rooted in the American
experience are susceptible to different interpretations. In 'The
Mob at the Gates" we can congratulate ourselves with the
interpretation that celebrates our "triumph over savages and
evil abroad!" Or we can understand the story in such a way as to
reveal the difference between our actions and ideals, and conclude:
"The world is succumbing to tyranny, barbarism, and devastation,
while we stand idly by!" "The Triumpahnt Individual" can mean:
"Rejoice in the opportunity open to each of us to gain fame and
fortune!" or "Hard work and merit are sabotaged by convention,
chicanery, and prejudice!" "The Benevolent Community can
mean: "Admire our generosity and compassion!" or "We are
selfish, narcissistic, racist, and indifferent—look at the poor and
hungry in our midst!" "The Rot at the Top" can mean: "See how
we have overcome vested privilege!" or "Our democracy is a
sham, and everything important is controlled by a venal cabal at
the top!"
A version of 'The Rot at the Top" can be seen in a body of
opinion which sees a powerful and greedy elite in the business
and corporate world (built on a philosophical base of instrumental
or utilitarian individualism) functioning in such a way as to
harm family and community values. Charles Reich, the author of

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

The Greening of America, represents this considerable body of
opinion when he asserts that economic growth often means "less
of everything we really need, aside from material goods." One of
the things we really need, Reich believes, is a sense of community.
But "communities deteriorate when local companies want to make
so much money that they leave the communities and go where
labor is cheaper and where tax laws are more favorable" (52).
Richard John Neuhaus (37) in The Naked Public Square
examines the loss of a sense of community in the religious sphere
of American experience. He finds that a fundamentalist strain of
Protestantism has separated public argument from private belief,
with the result that religious beliefs cannot be submitted to
public reason. Neuhaus finds (82) that religion "as a mediating
structure—a community that generates and transmits moral
values—is no longer available ..." The individual's beliefs have
become private and are valid for the individual, without reference
to the beliefs of others; individual beliefs need not be submitted
to the examination of other individuals or to the community.
Neuhaus' findings corroborate in the religious sphere what
Bellah and his associates find generally in American society.
David W. Brown in a discussion of "Civic Virtue in America"
points to changed conditions of life in America as a cause for the
felt diminution of community. More and more Americans have
gained access to "the portable credentials of higher education"
and now live and work cut off from "the local institutions in which
they were raised." These Americans constitute a new class whose
members "appear to be passionate consumers instead of active
citizens—like lovely willow trees with shallow roots." In agreement
with Bellah, and corroborating Tocqueville (v. 2,257), who feared
that Americans might end up "farming nothing but small coteries"
instead of genuine communities, Brown finds members of this
new class calculating and self-absorbed ("You owe it to yourself,"
"What's in it for me?"). The communities they join tend to be not
genuine communities with a diversity of people, values, views,
but communities of interest, enclaves composed of like-minded

�COMMUNITY

people with similar backgrounds, incomes, and tastes. Brown
wonders whether a " 'community' of interest, if it has no
geographical place, a neighborhood or a town, where friendship
and obligation are practiced, can be sustained" (40).
Even members of this new class who genuinely desire it
discover the circumstances of their lives working against
commitment to local community. Thus Richard Fox (12), a
professor of history and humanities at Reed College, admits:
It is difficult individually to enact both a professional
disciplinary existence and a local neighborhood family
existence. Family is an important community for me, as is
a professional discipline. Local community is where I do
not seem to spend any time. There may be an irreducible
conflict here, and the best that we can hope for is emerging
in some possible communities but not in all possible
communities.
Indeed, there is little evidence that community can prosper
apart from a particular place, a neighborhood, locale, or town.
For the new class of highly mobile and highly educated people (a
class to which Richard Fox belongs) it might seem that they could
conceive of the nation as a community in which they might
function and to which they could feel a commitment. But the
sense of the entire nation as a single community seems to be
capable of creation only in extraordinary circumstances, and for
limited periods, as, for instance, during the Great Depression or
during World War II. By the 1960s Lyndon Johnson was unable
to evoke a similar sense of national community for the War on
Poverty or the Vietnam War, and by the 1980s President Ronald
Reagan repudiated Roosevelt's vision of the country as a national
community in favor of a view of the nation as a collection of local
communities (Robert Reich, 170). (This view was echoed in
President George Bush's repeated references during the 1988
presidential campaign to "a thousand points of light.")
By the late 1980s the meaning of neighborhood, and hence of

39

community, had changed. The small towns and ethnic sections of
earlier times had given way to what Robert Reich calls "economic
enclaves whose members had little in common with one another
but their average incomes." And in this context the story of'The
Benevolent Community" had little applicability. Some observers
saw the Reagan recommendation of local volunteerism and
concern for neighborhood as a sham, for in contemporary America
the idea of community and neighborhood offered a "way of
enjoying the sentiment of benevolence without the burden of
acting on it" (Robert Reich, 171).
This conflation of immediate neighborhood and community
caused people to feel that responsibility ended at the borders of
their own neighborhoods, and since most Americans could see
that their neighborhoods were not suffering, little charity need
be exercised. If there were needy people, in some other
neighborhood, members of that other neighborhood, that other
community, bore the responsibility for helping out. This view
allowed the poor to cluster in their own neighborhoods, in large
cities, isolated from affluent suburbs that ringed them. The
Reagan-Bush approach to neighborhood and community amounted
to hollow rhetoric, according to one analyst. "Pure volunteerism,
as espoused by the Reagan-Bush administration, asks the private
sector to fill gaps created by American capitalism and vacated by
a retreating federal government; essentially, it leaves the war on
poverty in the hands of the vigilantes" (Bennett, A-7).
According to these dour commentaries, genuine community
is lacking both in the larger nation-community and in the
smaller neighborhoods.
One looks in vain for a commentator on American life who can
report a satisfactory sense of contemporary community. Liberal
and conservative pundits alike deplore the lack of community,
but disagree on how community is appropriately promoted or
supported. Conservatives tend to see activism on the part of
intellectuals in government, especially at the national level, as
destructive of community, while liberals are more likely to see

�40

"commitments to community ... under constant attack, not by
intellectuals or counter-cultures, as conservatives imagine, but
by corporate capitalism... ." (Fox, 10).
A liberal observer, Bill Moyers wonders on a Public
Broadcasting System program in the autumn of 1988 whether
the automobile might not have made it possible for us to get
around without getting together; whether automobiles have not
allowed the prosperous to escape to suburbs, commute to work in
the cities, and daily by-pass the poor in the inner cities. George
Will, a generally conservative syndicated columnist who ordinarily
stands four-square for the rights of the individual, suggests in a
televised roundtable in the same season that we might have too
much of even such a good thing as individual rights: we are
forever asserting the rights of the individual, he opines, but we
must remember that the community has rights, too.
What are we to make of these various analyses of the
American character, these interpretations of American history,
and these observations about contemporary American life? Are
these different "personalities" with their visions of the good life
jostling in disorderly fashion down through our history? Are
different American morality tales being told simultaneously and
discordantly generation after generation?
Perhaps these analyses may be subsumed under the
interpretation set forth by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (et passim)
in The Cycles of American History, in which he explains American
history in terms of a tradition and a counter-tradition, both of
which spring from the world-view and values of our colonial
forebears. The people who established New Plymouth and the
Massachusetts Bay Colony were both pessimistic and optimistic
about human nature and life in this world; they were both
pragmatic and idealistic. On the one hand they believed man was
weak, limited, and fallen, and could be depended upon to err; on
the other, they felt themselves to be an elect people with a
mission to build the "city upon a hill" that would be a model for
other people. This tradition and counter-tradition, according to

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

Schlesinger, correspond roughly to political and social conservatism
and liberalism in the American experience, and have been in
constant interplay and cyclical alternation throughout our history.
When the essentially liberal and optimistic tradition is in the
ascendency, the sense of community and social responsibility
expands, and notions of freedom and equality flourish. As the
tradition runs its cyclical course, it is supplanted by the countertradition, which brings in a period of retrenchment, an era
devoted to emphasis on the individual and private interest. In
such a period the sense of community contracts.
Schlesinger estimates the cycles of tradition and countertradition to be approximately thirty years in duration. The
period encompassing the Great Depression and lasting until well
into the 1960s constituted a cycle in which the liberal tradition
was in the ascendency. President John F. Kennedy in 1961 could
still exhort Americans to ask not what their country could do for
them, but what they could do for their country. During this time
Americans responded positively to a vision of the entire nation as
a single community. That period was followed by an assertion of
the conservative counter-tradition and an emphasis on the
individual and private interests.
The dire predictions of sociologists and journalists with
regard to the erosion of community in America might well be
considered in the context of this cyclical interpretation of American
history, which, if it has validity, suggests that the idea of community
in the American experience waxes and wanes, and that the
darkest hour for community is always just before a brightening
of prospects.
The voting habits of Americans lend support to Schlesinger's
interpretation of American history as a tradition and a countertradition, one essentially liberal and idealistic and favorable to
the formation and maintenance of community; the other essentially
pragmatic and conservative and tending to emphasize the
individual. A syndicated columnist analyzing the results of the
1988 elections noted that twenty-two of the fifty states sent

�COMMUNITY

divided delegations (one liberal, one conservative senator) to the
U. S. Senate, and in four out of the past five elections the voters
have put one party in charge of the White House and the other
in charge of the Congress. The columnist took these data to mean
that "Americans don't want an energetic government," and cited
an elder statesman who considered such voting patterns irrational
and tending to result in "divided and deadlocked government"
(Kilpatrick,A-4).
It is also possible to view these voting patterns as evidence of
both the tradition and counter-tradition Schlesinger posits;
evidence of both pragmatic and idealist impulses in the American
electorate, one essentially conservative, the other liberal; one
favoring government which tends to be activist and focused on
the community good, the other favoring a relatively passive
government (especially in domestic affairs) which gives greater
scope to the individual. The voting patterns may be interpreted
to mean Americans understand that the impulses toward
individualism and toward community are both legitimate; that
both continuity and change, progress and stability are desirable.
George Will ("Another Muddy Message," 30) suggests that
Americans are "idealogically conservative," and therefore wary
of big government, while at the same time "operationally liberal"
and quite willing to tolerate government when we have faith that
it is operating on our behalf. Our vote for president is an
ideological and expressive act which affirms "what we are and
want to be tomorrow." Voting for president, we are ideologically
conservative. When we vote for senators and representatives,
and for state and local offices, our vote is more likely to be based
on what we want right now, hence operationally liberal.
Expressively we are against big government and governmental
regulation of our lives; operationally we require government
programs and big government capable of mounting such programs.
Perhaps the electorate instinctively understands, as Robert
Bellah and his co-authors believe, that "communal commitment
and individual fulfillment rise or fall together" (Fox, 10).

41

When we listen attentively to what contemporary Americans
actually say, as has Studs Terkel (etpassim) mAmerican Dreams:
Lost and Found, we find both the impulses to individualism and
the urge for community, both Schlesinger's tradition and countertradition, in microcosm. For Americans are pragmatic, but they
are also idealistic; they are materialistic, but they also dream
about and value things other than material and financial success.
Americans are highly individualistic, but they also find great
satisfaction in, and place value on, family, community, and work
as things worthwhile in themselves.
The twin impulses toward individualism on the one hand and
community on the other often manifest themselves as ambivalence,
as in voting habits, or in the way we define "neighborhood" and
"community" in word and deed. Constance Perin inBelonging in
America argues that we are conspicuously equivocal not only
about whom we call "neighbor," but also about what we consider
community. We may value community, yet we readily leave
communities for better jobs or homes elsewhere. We aren't sure
where the boundaries of our neighborhoods are. We don't
necessarily consider the people next door, or on the same block,
our neighbors. Yet Perin cites a California farmer who in 1986
sent hay to drought-stricken farmers in Greorgia because "We're
'cross the United States, but we're still a neighbor" (Fischer, 18).
Such statements are valuable, for we are usually least
articulate about those things that matter most to us and which
we therefore take most for granted. Thus, concepts like family,
community, and work are so deeply imbedded in our consciousness,
so value-laden and freighted with feeling, that our most revealing
expressions of them are apt to be in off-hand remarks such as
that of the California farmer, or in the oblique revelations of
anecdotes, folk tales, customs, and patterns discerned in details
of seemingly insignificant daily life.
Despite the changes that improved transportation and
communications have brought, and despite our ambivalence
about who our neighbors are and about the boundaries of our

�42

communities, we may expect place to continue to play a vital role
in our notion of community The conventional wisdom has been
that as various parts of the country are connected by railways,
highways, and airline routes, and means of almost instantaneous
electronic communications, regional differences would be
diminished. But we have less and less reason to consider regions
and regional variations to be isolated, archaic survivals in a
standardizing country. On the contrary, not only in America, but
all over the world, people are rediscovering their regions and
provinces. Renewed interest in regions has been characterized as
world-wide "local centripetalism" (Troike, 2). Throughout the
1970s, a journalist discovered, new realities of power and people
were making the North American continent into nine different
"nations" (Garreau, et passim).
New realities of power and people are causing us to experience,
according to Harold Isaacs (1), "on a massively universal scale a
convulsive ingathering of people in their numberless groupings
in kinds—tribal, racial, linguistic, religious, national." This worldwide assertion of group identity is in itself a search for community,
and has implications for the kinds of community we may hope to
create. Isaacs finds that the relative positions of the individual
and the group have shifted in contemporary society, a fact which
"touches the bedrock of the whole American system. . . ." Our
system is based on the rights of the individual, yet individuals
are coming to new perceptions of themselves as members of
groups and claiming rights not as individuals, but as members of
groups. This new relationship of the "one" to the "many" has
implications for community and is not unrelated to considerations
of place (212-13).
According to Rene Dubos (10), "we are beginning to witness
a revival of regionalism that will complement the global point of
view." This revival is a reaction to a powerful trend toward
uniformity; it comes not despite the world's having grown smaller,
but because it has done so. The likely result, Dubos believes, will
be that the world of forty or fifty years from now will be One

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

World, but will include many local worlds within it. We need
these local worlds because "human beings require more than
health and economic security." Human life is also made up of
"emotional and spiritual satisfactions that have their origins in
our contacts with our physical world and social surroundings."
These local worlds are the immediate communities in which
we live. They are made necessary, paradoxically, because nationstates, and the industrialized world everywhere, do not provide
a sufficient sense of community. E. D. Hirsch (96) stresses this
point in Cultural Literacy when he writes:
If our system had not encouraged localism and diversity,
we would in any case have developed them. I four diversity
had not arisen from immigration, local accident, and
other historical causes, we would have evolved local
differences anyway. Localism is constantly being reinvented
all over the world, since the large, modern national state
does not and cannot lend enough social glue or emotional
meaning to satisfy the human desire for community.
Our communities are already, and in the future will increasingly
be, what Bellah refers to in Habits of the Heart as "communities
of memory," places whose people are bound together by an
understanding of a common past, a shared history and heritage.
The markers for such communities will continue to be, to varying
degrees, linguistic distinctiveness—regional speech and dialectical
usage. For just as distinctive speech patterns constitute a boundary
that excludes some people, the same boundary includes others
and identifies them as members of a speech community. In the
tenth canto of The Divine Comedy (40-44) Dante, escorted through
a region of hell by Virgil, is overheard speaking in his Tuscan
dialect by one of the souls enduring torture there, who calls out
to Dante:
O Tuscan! thou, who through the city of fire
Alive art passing, so discreet of speech:
Here, please thee, stay awhile. Thy utterance
Declares the place of thy nativity ...

�COMMUNITY

The condemned soul is so charmed by the sound of his native
speech that for a while at least he is able to forget the tortures of
hell as he converses with Dante. Language, to a significant
degree, defines, creates, and maintains a sense of community, as
the unknown author of these doggerel lines on the expression
"you-all" suggests: "You-all means a race or section/ Family,
party, tribe, or clan;/You-all means the whole connection/ Of the
individual man" (Bartlett, 922). Often we are strangely comforted
and reassured by the familiar way a person speaks, even if we
disagree with what is said. "Home in the twentieth century," the
journalist Dave Hickey observes, "is less where your heart is
than where you understand the sons-of-bitches" (Garreau, vi).
By being sensitive to the linguistic communities and
communities of memory that already exist, educators at every
level can contribute to the creation and maintenance of community,
and to its extension to include "the whole connection" of the
individual man or woman. As Dewey advocated in Experience
and Education, this sensitivity on the part of educators requires
intimate acquaintance with the conditions of the local community
in which one teaches, with its physical, historical, economic, and
occupational conditions, in order to utilize the student's immediate
world as an educational resource (Selznick, 48).
There are encouraging signs that American educators are
more favorably inclined to give serious consideration to local
community than they have been within the past half century. In
an essay entitled "The Rootless Professors," Eric Zencey, a
professor of history and philosophy at Goddard College, signals
a changed attitude. For too long, Zencey writes, American college
and university professors have fancied themselves as "citizens of
some mythical 'world city' or cosmopolis" who "may be
systematically blind to some of the crucial elements of an integrated
life—the life that is one of the primary goals of a liberal arts
education—and to the values of connectedness to place." College
and university professors have typically asked their students to
"renounce citizenship in the political and biotic communities of

43

their home to embrace citizenship in the world city of ideas and
culture that their education offers them"—without realizing that
they are asking students to give up "real and immediate connections
in favor of an abstraction." Zencey challenges professors to
overcome their "prejudice against the local and provincial"; to
"take the trouble to include local content in courses"; to "take
more seriously the regional branches of professional organizations
in our various disciplines"; and to acquire "dual citizenship—in
the world of ideas and also in the very real counties, states,
regions, and ecosystems in which we find ourselves
" Zencey
calls for cosmopolitan educators who cultivate a sense of place
and "exemplify... a successful resolution of the tension between
the local and the universal" (72). (Zencey's approach is being
disregarded in the current rush to "universalize" college and
university curricula) (Vasquez, A-48).
A model of such an educator might be Edwina Sheppard
Pepper, who established the John A. Sheppard Ecological
Reservation in West Virginia; who was also instrumental in
founding the Big Laurel School of Learning for mountain children;
and who was described by consumer advocate Ralph Nader as an
"unsung heroine" for her imaginative and creative response to
environmental problems of her community. "As more and more
land has been stripped or deep mined," Nader explained, "the
inhabitants of these mountains have lost not only their homes,
but also their sense of worth. Mrs. Pepper has tried to restore the
feeling of community and resourcefulness the inhabitants'
forefathers knew" (Edwina Pepper, B-12).
In making community a more important consideration in the
educational process, regional and local perspectives can be
extremely useful. They can present academic disciplines as they
interpenetrate and impinge on one another; issues and problems
in contexts that do not dwarf the individual; and the possibility
of better combinations of thought and action, knowledge and
power, scholarship and citizenship. Regional approaches offer
both ways of understanding the geography behind history and

�44

ways of understanding history in a geographical context.
Community-based approaches can also provide opportunities
to instruct students in practical economics, as Paul Gagnon
maintains in "Why Study History?" (56), a study of the way
American history is presented in widely used textbooks. Gagnon
finds that textbooks inadequately instruct young Americans in
the way economic expansion has always been supported by
public efforts. In the past this expansion "was heavily subsidized
by American consumers, taxpayers, workers, and also by slave
labor in the South and by an earlier generation of British and
Europeans, whose labor produced investment capital. Subsidy
remains a bad word in the American lexicon, yet it is axiomatic
that all enterprise must in some way be subsidized to one degree
or another.... Texts could say that there is nothing wrong with
subsidy as such, provided that the gains and losses are reasonably
distributed. It is another name for community effort."
Such an understanding of American economic history would
render less utopian Robert Reich's concept of "collective
entrepreneurialism," which conceives of a firm or corporation as
a community (Robert Reich, 150). This or a similar presentation
of American economic history would help to blend the message of
capitalism, which says the individual must make it on his own,
with the Christian message (valued by the founders of Plymouth
Colony) that says we bear responsibility for our neighbors and for
others in our community and encourages us to think of ourselves
as community members.
A widely held point of view maintains that our way of
thinking and talking about American life overemphasizes the
role of the individual, while underemphasizing the importance of
community, thus impoverishing our entire moral discourse.
According to this critique, we are increasingly asked to think of
ourselves as individual consumers, with the result that a sense
of community, of purposes pursued in common, is eroded.
Encouraged in mean-spirited self-interest and self-absorption,
we withdraw from generosity, compassion, concern for others.

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

Ellen Goodman (228-29), an acute observer of the contemporary
scene, has called this withdrawal "a privatization of everything."
Symbolic of this privatization of all aspects of our lives during the
past decade, she thinks, was the conversion of a Boston church
into a condominium. A church, a place where people communed,
was converted into rentable, leasable, purchaseable private
spaces. This conversion illustrates, in Goodman's view, a general
turning away from community into private spaces, a greater
concern with private goods than with the public good. If our lives
are focused on private consumption, so goes this argument, we
are disposed to reduce our support of public efforts and institutions
(education, safety, recreation). For when we think of ourselves
primarily as consumers, we will prefer burglar alarms to police
forces; private gardens to public parks; private vacations to
community recreation; Home Box Office and video discs to public
libraries or public broadcasting. We will see nothing odd about
cutting subsidies to mass transportation while making government
loans to automakers.
Parents and students, this argument contends, have even
been asked to think of themselves as consumers of education,
with the result that more and more emphasis is placed on shortterm benefits, and education is viewed in an increasingly narrow
way. We look for education that can be quickly translated into
good (by which we mean well-paying) jobs. The long-term value
and the broader view of education are less and less emphasized
when we think of education as a product, not as a process, and of
ourselves as consumers of it.
Communities must of course consist of intelligent, thoughtful
individuals whose capacities are developed to their fullest. Both
statements remind us that while training is an important part of
any education, training alone can only make us into a tool, an
instrument to be employed by someone else. Genuine education
aims to produce more than a one-eyed Cyclopean view of life as
consumership lived in private spaces by people who "reck not of
one another." In the same way that our two eyes, working

�COMMUNITY

together, produce a single vision, our training and our education
function as two eyes which can work together, providing vision
for our individual lives as well as for our lives in common with
others; coordinating our vocations and our citizenship in a single
vision which sees, as N. Scott Momaday once put it, "beyond all
the billboards of illusion" that confront us when we think of
ourselves only as consumers of goods and services.
The alternative to the one-eyed, Cyclopean life of individuals
who take no thought for one another is suggested by the poet
Gary Snyder (101), whose recommendations for effective citizenship
begin with a consideration of community as a physical place. It
is not possible, Snyder writes, to make things better "without our
feet on the ground. Stewardship means, for most of us, find your
place on the planet, dig in, and take responsibility from there "
Snyder's conception of citizenship assumes work at the community
level—the "tangible work of school boards, county supervisors,
local foresters, local politics. Even while holding in mind the
largest scale of potential change. Get a sense of a workable
territory, learn about it, and start acting point by point."
The Appalachian region of America is a workable territory; it
is a definable place on the planet where citizens can dig in and
take responsibility, where work at the level of local community is
compatible with national and international perspectives. The
Appalachian region is one of those potential "communities of
memory and hope" considered so important by Robert Bellah and
the other authors of Habits of the Heart. For Appalachian America,
according to the historian Carl Degler (5), has an interesting and
complex triple history. The region has the double history shared
by all Southerners—a history as Southerners and as Americans.
Additionally, southern Appalachia has a history of its own, as
neither north or south, as a borderland America, a place between
places.
In Southern Appalachia, America's first frontier, many different
groups came together: the English and Scotch-Irish, the Swiss,
the Germans, the French, together with native Americans and

45

blacks. In Southern Appalachia two different economies and
cultures mingled: the planter economy and culture of the lowland
South and the economy and culture of the small, independent
farmer. This mingling of economies and cultures, nationalities
and ethnic groups made Appalachia, according to the historian
Wertenbaker (The Old South, 219), "a test laboratory of American
civilization."
Southern Appalachia was and still is a test laboratory of
American civilization. In the nineteenth century Cassius Clay
considered the people of the mountain South natural supporters
of freedom because they owned land but few slaves (Peck, 4,64).
And today one of the things being tested is whether or not—as
Robert Coles (201) suspects—there is something redemptive for
all America in the experiences, the values, the culture, the
"community of memory" known as Southern Appalachia.
In years past many young college- and university-trained
people from Southern Appalachia have had to go outside their
region to find opportunities in professions. Regrettably, higher
education has often effectively cut people off from their communities
and people. Amother from Blackey, Kentucky (Reck, 24), expressed
what many parents have felt over the years when she said,
commenting on the exodus of young people, "We lose our purpose
when we lose our children . . . they . . . become citizens of
nowhere."
In recent years it has been increasingly possible for collegeand university-trained people to find opportunities within their
Southern Appalachian region. This may become increasingly the
case, for Southern Appalachia has many needs—health care
professionals, teachers, nurses, trained professionals in local
government, community workers of all kinds. The efforts of
humanities educators in the Southern Appalachian region can
contribute to a "community of memory and hope"; as teachers of
history, literature, economics, political science, and other disciplines
associated with the humanities, the region's educators can help
to replace "citizens of nowhere" with citizens of somewhere—

�46

communities constituted by both space and time, by a sense of
history and collective experience and an understanding that
individual good and the welfare of the total community are
inseparable.
Our writers contribute significantly to our awareness of
ourselves as members of a community. For in contemporary
America, just as they have done in all times and places, writers
function as creators and sustainers of communities of memory.
Writers, John Updike (23) has pointed out recently, instruct the
community in matters of tribal identity. "Who we are, who our
heroic fathers were, how we got where we are, why we believe
what we believe and act the way we do—these are all questions
the writer deals with, whether in poems, songs, or stories that
serve as memory banks."
A recent collection of stories by Wendell Berry (136-37)
provides a contemporary example of this ancient function of the
writer as a creator and sustainer of community. Berry's collection
The Wild Birds bears the subtitle "Six Stories of the Port William
Membership," an allusion to the collection's theme of
interdependence, the notion that the people of Berry's fictional
Port William are all responsible to and for one another and to
their place; that not only those who happen to be living at the
moment have a say in things, but also the dead and the yet
unborn. They are all—the living, the dead, and the yet unborn of
that place—part of a membership. As a character, Burly Coulter,
observes in the title story,"... we are members of each other. All
of us. Everything. The difference ain't in who is a member and
who is not, but in who knows it and who don't." It is from such
communities of memory as those found in the writing of Berry
and other American writers that we are most likely to recover
and carry forward our sense of community.
Works by three major American writers—Hawthorne's The
Scarlet Letter, Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" and Walden, and
Sinclair Lewis's Main Street provide the basis for text-centered
considerations of the theme of community in American life.

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

The Scarlet Letter
by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Often considered the first genuinely American novel, The
Scarlet Letter is a central text in the American literary canon,
recognized for the universality of its story, the humanness of its
characters, for its form and structure, and for the appropriateness
of its language. Hawthorne's story is about concealed sin (with
emphasis more on the concealment than on the sin) and its
effects on four individuals—Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale,
Roger Chillingsworth, and Hester and Dimmesdale's daughter
Pearl. Hawthorne is also concerned with the Puritan community
in which his story is set, with its values, with the relationship of
his main characters to the community, and with the way the
individuals affect the community, its attitudes, values, and more.
From the moment Hester Prynne emerges from prison wearing
the scarlet letter "A" on her dress, she is confronted—in the
market—by the community, represented by a number of deftly
sketched minor characters. And at the end of the story, when the
Reverend Mr. Dimmesdale publicly acknowledges his guilt—
again in the marketplace, on a scaffold before the assembled
citizenry—the confrontation is one between the individual and the
community. Hawthorne's story of these four individuals is framed
by an initial and a concluding confrontation with the community
and its values while at the same time it shows the harshness and
inflexibility with which these values are held and expressed.
The individuals are changed by their confrontation with the
community, but the community, too, is changed as the individuals,
who have lived for the most part in isolation from it, are
reintegrated into the community through the public revelation of
their sin, and through the community's interpretation of the
meaning of the public revelation in the marketplace. In time
even the meaning of the scarlet letter itself changes from that of
stigma to a symbol associated with sorrow, awe, and reverence,
and Hester Prynne herself becomes a comforter and a counselor
in the village.

�47

COMMUNITY

"Civil Disobedience" and Walden

Main Street

by Henry David Thoreau

by Sinclair Lewis

Many of Thoreau's assertions might at first give the impression
that he dissociates himself from any idea of community. "I am not
responsible for the successful working of the machinery of society,"
he declares in "Civil Disobedience" (222-240). He expresses his
felt sense of difference and distance from his neighbors, as when,
coming out of jail for refusal to pay taxes, he says he saw that his
neighbors were "a distinct race from me by their prejudices and
superstitions, as the Chinaman and Maylays are
"In the same
essay he writes, "I quietly declare war on the state ... though I
will still make what use and get what advantage of her I can."
Yet Thoreau is not unconcerned with the idea of community.
On the contrary, he desires a different and better kind of community
than what he finds available. His attitude toward his neighbors,
toward the larger community of Concord, and toward the state is
influenced by his individualism and devotion to principle and the
highest calling of his conscience. Thoreau declares his desire to
be "a good neighbor" and "a bad subject" (of the state). He calls
for a community and a government which can show "a true
respect for the individual." His move to Walden Pond, where he
lived for over two years, is not a turning away from community,
or an antisocial act of withdrawal from community; rather, the
move is an attempt to discover how a community might be better.
He undertakes a practical experiment to discover whether the
necessities of life could not be obtained more simply and easily
than was the case among his neighbors, who were caught up in
an unexamined, materialistic life. Thoreau goes to Walden Pond
with his neighbors and the larger community in mind As he
announces early on in Walden, his purpose is to wake his
neighbors up. His wish is to waken everyone to the realization
that living can be simple and yet fulfilling to the individual; that
it is possible to imagine a community compatible with greater
freedom for its individual members.

Carol Milford Kennicott, the protagonist of Main Street, is
similarly bent on waking her neighbors up and improving the
community of Gopher Prairie, to which she has moved after
marrying one of the town's residents, Dr. Will Kennicott. Her
husband is representative of his community in that he is a
complacent, conventional, self-satisfied booster of his home town,
practical and matter-of-fact, not inclined to examine life—his
own or anyone else's. Carol, however, wants to improve things.
She wants to reform her husband, Gopher Prairie, the whole
community.
In this effort she encounters opposition not only from her
husband, but from everyone else in Gopher Prairie. Or if not
active opposition, then stolid indifference. The men are interested
in cars and trains. They are xenophobic and convinced that their
town is the greatest place on earth. The women, who belong to
two clubs in town, The Jolly Seventeen and The Thanatopsis
Club, have no interests beyond homemaking, cooking, and their
children. They have no conception of improving their lives, for
they see nothing wrong with things as they are. Carol Kennicott
discovers that the members of The Thanatopsis Club, though
officially dedicated to improving social conditions, are not interested
in improving anything; in fact, they have no notion of what
improvements would entail. They are not interested in helping
the poor and deny that Gopher Prairie has any poor. Carol
discovers that the town librarian does not consider it part of her
role to encourage people to read; more important to her is
keeping the books in their proper places on the library shelves.
Nevertheless, Carol Kennicott makes a number of efforts to
change the community. She tries to raise funds for a new city hall.
She puts on an amateur theatrical, has dreams of an annual
Community Day—all in an effort to create a "more conscious life"
for the community. But she finds herself pitted against what

�48

de Tocqueville, in his classic examination of America, termed
the "tyranny of the majority." People in Gopher Prairie disapprove
of her because she pays a maid a salary they consider too
generous. She demonstrates, in their view, that she is
unconventional when she gives a party with an Oriental theme.
She proves to be positively scandalous—especially after she has
a dalliance with a young tailor in the town.
Eventually Carol Kennicott feels that the citizens of Gopher
Prairie are a race apart from her—no less than Thoreau felt
distanced from his neighbors after spending a night in jail. And
when she and her husband "lie together in a hot bed in a creepy
room—enemies, yoked" (284), she thinks they represent two
races of people: a race of the "neurotic," to which she belongs, and
a race of the "stupid," to which her husband Will and the other
residents of Gopher Prairie belong. Finally she is set apart from
the community of Gopher Prairie and stigmatized by its residents
no less than was Hester Prynne in Salem. In the eyes of the
residents of Gopher Prairie Carol wears a letter "R" (for reformer)
or an "F (for idealist).
Thinking to escape Gopher Prairie, its smug complacency
and narrowness, its refusal to examine life, she leaves her
husband, and taking her young son with her, goes to Washington,
where she hopes to become involved in war work. She needs to
find out what her work is (404). She discovers that Washington
is only a larger Gopher Prairie.
The Scarlet Letter, "Civil Disobedience" and Walden, and
Main Street offer varied instances of individuals in their relationship
to community. The texts are useful in helping to isolate, examine,
and better understand the tensions that exist in the American
experience between American individualism and our sense of
community. The two "races" identified by Carol Kennicott in
Main Street correspond not only to "two souls" resident in the
breast of Sinclair Lewis, but to something in the American
character, in American cultural values. The "enemies, yoked" are

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

not only the idealist Carol Kennicott beside her complacent and
unimaginative husband, on a hot night in Gopher Prairie; they
are antimonies in the complex of American attitudes, values, and
mores—the romantic, progressive, principled idealist impulse
alongside the realist, materialistic impulse which is, though
often crude and crass, nevertheless capable of seeing its opportunity
and taking it. One is reminded of the embodiment of these
impulses in extreme form in Quentin and Jason Compson in
William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury.

Works Cited
Adams, John Quincy. Writings of John Quincy Adams. Edited by Worthington Chauncey Ford.
V. 1-7. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1913-17.
Anderson, Sherwood. Winesburg, Ohio. Edited by John H. Ferres. New York: The Viking Press.
The Viking Critical Library, 1966.
Barnes, Jonathan, ed. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. The Revised Oxford
Translation. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Bartett, John. Familiar Quotations. Edited by Emily Morrison Beck. Fifteenth and 125th
Anniversary Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1980.
Bellah, Robert, etal. Habits of the Heart. Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New
York: Harper &amp; Row, 1985.
Bennet, James. "Gentle Fuzziness." Louisville, Kentucky Courier Journal, October 24,1988:
A-7.
Berry, Wendell. The Wild Birds. San Francisco: North Point Press, 1986.
Boorstin, Daniel J. The Americans: The National Experience. New York: Random House, 1965.
Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation, 1620-1647. A new edition. The Complete Text. With
Notes and an Introduction by Samuel Eliot Morison. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1953.
Brown, David W. "Civic Virtue in America." National Forum, LXVII.2 (1987): 39-41.
Cappon, Lester J. The Adams-Jefferson Letters. 2 vols. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press, 1959.
Coles, Robert. "On the Humanities and on Appalachia." Appalachian Journal, 5.2 (1978): 197203.
Commager, Henry Steele. The American Mind. An Interpretation of American Thought and
Character Since the 1880s. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950,
Dante Alighieri. The Divine Comedy. Tr. Henry F. Gary. New York: P. F. Collier &amp; Son, 1937.

�49

COMMUNITY

Degler, Carl N. The Other South. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1974.

Perin, Constance. Belonging in America. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.

Dick, Everett. The Dixie Frontier. A Social History of the Southern Frontier from the First
Transmontane Beginnings to the Civil War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.

Reck, Una Mae Lange, and Gregory G. Reck. "Living is More Important than Schooling:
Schools and Self Concept in Appalachia." Appalachian Journal, 8.1 (1980): 19-25.

Dubos, Rene. "Recycling Social Man." Saturday Review/World, 24 August, 1974:8-10.

Reich, Charles. The Greening of America. New York: Random House, 1970.

Fischer, Claude S. Those People Next Door." New York Times Book Review, November 13,
1988:18.

—. "The Liberals' Mistake." The Center Magazine, July/August 1987:49-59.

Fitzgerald, Frances. Cities on a Hill: A Journey Through Contemporary American Cultures.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1925.

Riesman, Harry, with Nathan Glazer and Ruel Denney. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the
Changing American Character. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.

Fox, Richard. The Liberal Ethic and the Spirit of Protestantism." The Center Magazine.
September/October 1987:4-14.
Freud, Sigmund. Collected Papers. Authorized translation by Alix and James Strachey. The
International Psycho-Analytical Library. No. 9. Edited by Ernest Jones, M.D. 5 vols. New
York: Basic Books, 1959.
Gagnon, Paul. "Why Study History?" The Atlantic Monthly. November 1988:43-66.
Galbraith, John Kenneth. The Affluent Society. 3rd Rev. Ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1981.
Goodman, Ellen. At Large. New York: Summit Books, 1981.
Greene, Evarts Boutell. The Revolutionary Generation. Vol. IV, A History of American Life,
Arthur M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company,
1929-48.
Hand, Learned. The Spirit of Liberty. Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand. Collected with
an introduction and notes by Irving Dilliard. Third edition, enlarged. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1952.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter and The House of Seven Gables. With an introduction
by James R. Mellow. New York: New American Library, 1981.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. Cultural Literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.
Homer. The Odyssey of Homer. Translated with an introduction by Richard Lattimore. New
York: Harper &amp; Row, 1967.
Isaacs, Harold. Idols of the Tribe. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1975.
Kilpatrick, James J. "Americans don't want energetic government" Bowling Green, Kentucky
Daily News, November 9,1988: A-4.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966.
Lewis, Sinclair. Main Street. With an Afterward by Mark Schorer. New York: New American
Library, 1961.
Masters, Edgar Lee. Spoon River Anthofogy. New Edition with New Poems. New York: The
Macmillan Company, 1959.
Maugham, W. Somerset. The Moon and Sixpence. Garden City, New York: International
Collector's Library. 1919.
Neuhaus, Richard John. The Naked Public Square. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B.
Eerdman's Publishing Company, 1984.
Peck, Elizabeth S. Berea's First 125 Years: 7555-1980. With a final chapter by Emily Ann Smith.
Lexington, Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1982.
"Edwina Pepper, founder of mountain school, dies." Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal,
November 13,1988:6-12.

Reich, Robert Tales of a New America. New York: Times Books, 1987.

Russell, Bertrand. Skeptical Essays. George Allen &amp; Unwin Ltd., 1935.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. The Cycles of American History. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1986.
Selznick, Philip. The Demands of the Community." 7776 Center Magazine, January/February
1987:33-54.
Shapiro, Larry, ed. A Book of Days in American History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,
1987.
Snyder, Gary. Turtle Island. New York: New Directions Books, 1974.
Still, James. River of Earth. New York: Viking Press, 1940; rpt Lexington, Kentucky: The
University Press of Kentucky, 1978.
Terkel, Studs. American Dreams: Lost and Found. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
Thoreau, Henry David. A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, Walden, The Maine
Woods, Cape Cod. Cambridge, England: The Library of America, 1985.
—. Walden and "Civil Disobedience." With an Afterword by Perry Miller. New York: New
American Library, 1960.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. In two volumes with a critical appraisal of each
volume by John Stuart Mill. New York: Schocken Books, 1961.
Troike, Rudolph C. The Future of English." 77?e Linguistic Reporter, May 1977:1-5.
Updike, John. The Writer Lectures." The New York Review of Books, June 16,1988: 23-27.
Vasquez, Jesse M. "Ethnic Studies Programs Are in Danger of Being Lost in the Current Rush
to 'Universalize' the College Curriculum." 7776 Chronicle of Higher Education, November
16, 1988:A-48.
Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson. The First Americans. Vol. 11, A History of American Life, Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
—. 7770 Old South. New York: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc., 1963.
Whipple, T. K. Study Out the Land. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1943.
Will, George. "Pin the label on the donkey." Newsweek, August 1,1988:62.
—. "Another muddy message." Newsweek, November 21,1988:30.
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1976.
Wish, Harvey. Society and Thought in America. 2 vols. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.,
1950.
Zencey, Eric. The Rootless Professors." 7776 Chronicle of Higher Education, XXX. 15 (June 12,
1985): 72.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

50

Participant Reflections: Community
According to Robert Bellah, a community is comprised of
memories:
Communities... have a history—in an important sense they
are constituted by their past—and for this reason we can
speak of a real community as a "community of memory/'
one that does not forget its past. In order not to forget that
past, a community is involved in retelling its story,... and
in so doing, it offers examples of the men and women who
have embodied andexemplified the meaning of community
(153).
Perhaps the most effective way of telling America's story is
through its literature, stories, verse, and songs because through
fictional characters, the past becomes present, lives and breathes
and is understood by comparison and identification with local
situations, local characters, and local communities.
Willa Ann Baker, "In Search of
Community"
The United States continues to undergo a change within the
rural farming community. No longer is the country based on an
agrarian economy. An evolution has occurred within society
toward a business- and service-oriented community. With this
shift in focus away from the family farm and rural community,
the nation's value system has experienced a change as well.
People can no longer value the family farm when it is not
economically or personally satisfying. As a result, more and more
family farms will cease to exist. The family farming tradition is
coming to a rapid conclusion, marking the end of the farm-based
community.
Vickie Sutton, "The Grip of
Progress on the Family Farm"

We all know the contributions to scholarship and the
preservation of culture that we owe to the various monastic
communities of the Middle Ages. Most Americans are aware of
the effects on our national character and culture of such religious
communities as the Puritans and the Quakers. But do you know
that we owe the invention of the circular Saw, the propeller, and
the clothes pin to the communal Shakers? that many of our
educational ideas come from the experimental schools set up in
the nineteenth-century communities of followers of Fourier and
Owens? that the first free public schools in America were part of
one of these communities in New Harmony, Illinois? that the
silver or stainless steel flatware you buy from Oneida today is
manufactured by a company started as a "free-love" commune?
My point is that communitarianism as a Western and an American
tradition has had far-reaching effects on our culture.
Louis H. Palmer, III, "Zoulakia: A
Look at an Intentional
Community"
Of the three sinners in Hawthorne's book, Hester alone
survives. It might be interesting to look at why. Early on in the
novel, Hester's sin sets her outside the comfort and security of
the community in which she lived That Hester truly considered
herself a part of the community is evident in her conscious
penance. There are many times that Hester speaks personally
about her sin. She tells Pearl at one point, "Once in my life I met
the Black Man!... This scarlet letter is his mark!" (172). Later
as she contemplates leaving New England she says, '"Look your
last on the scarlet letter and its wearer!'the people's victim and
lifelong bond-slave. . . ." (213). Thus, one must believe that
Hester was so imbued with the moral sentiment of her colony
that she accepted the fact that there was a sin which must be
paid for, and her staying may have partly been for that reason.
Rita Silver, "The Revolt Against
the Village"

�COMMUNITY

51

Hester's struggle to be true to her own values, to rise above
the bigotry and intolerance of her community, are universal
themes; yet they are particularly applicable to the American
experience. "The call of the American experience has been a
radical search for identity by attempting to free ourselves from
orders, old hierarchies of rank and belief, to discover the emergent
man" (Hoffman). The struggle of the individual against society
has been reflected not only in The Scarlet Letter but also in maj or
works such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Main Street,
and Spoon River Anthology.
Carolyn C. Cahill, 'The
Community: Hester Prynne's
Adversary in The Scarlet Letter"
In both novels, the structure of the communities seems based
on the Hamiltonian idea that the aristocracy—the wealthy,
landed, professional, or well-born—of a group is best suited to
govern the whole group.
The aristocracy's disregard for the common man's interests is
much more evident in Main Street. Lewis describes the Gopher
Prairie aristocracy as "... all persons engaged in a profession, or
earning more than twenty-five hundred dollars a year, or possessed
of grandparents born in America." The Stowbody, the Clark, the
Elder, and yes, the Kennicott and their kind, thus sit in judgment
of and wield power over the Scandinavian and German farmers,
mill hands, and hired girls. Every motion made by the farmers
and laborers to better their lives is immediately labeled "socialist"
by these superiors grown rich (or at least comfortable) off profits
earned by the common man's labor.
Janice K. Hildebrand, "Terms of
Isolation: An Examination of
Social Distance in The Scarlet
Letter and Main Street*

Sinclair Lewis lays bare the narrowness of the small town
with its solid middle-class values—home, family, regular habits,
business, smugness, and narrow-minded people. He considers all
small towns of his day the same and equally monotonous.
According to Goist, "The negative sides of small-town community:
sharing in the lives of others can frequently turn out to be petty
back-biting and gossip or sheer meddlesomeness." Lewis also
points out that solidarity among people can lead to the stifling of
the uniqueness of the individual.
Lynn Avant, "Individuality in
American Communities: Past and
Present"
Main Street and Lake Wobegon Days are literary creations
that fit into a body of literature concerned with the American
village in the twentieth century. At the turn of the century the
village was considered above attack. Charles and Mary Beard
report that when Harding ran for president, he campaigned as a
representative of the common people who lived in small towns.
Part of a campaign speech was:
What is the greatest thing in life, my countrymen? Happiness.
And there is more happiness in the American village than
in any other place on the face of the earth.
As Harding was extolling the happiness found in the villages, the
literary people were showing the weaknesses of the village. In
the 1980s the vast majority of the people live in larger communities.
The small town or village is now more a memory of the past which
we view through nostalgia-colored glasses. The problems listed
by Keillor are ones we acknowledge, but ones that we accept as
a less important theme or footnote to a place that is far away in
space and time.
Patricia B. Chastain, "The End of
an Era: A Comparison of Main
Street and Lake Wobegon Days"

�The Examined Ufe: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

52

The connections between the individual and the community
values give Hester Prynne her strength, but defeat Carol. The
difference lies not in the connection, but in the two women.
Hester uses her understanding of the values of the group to carve
a niche for herself and her daughter; eventually she leaves the
community but returns after providing for her daughter's future.
Carol leaves the community but returns to give birth to her
daughter. She has great plans for her daughter, but the reader is
left to wonder if she will be any more definite in providing for her
daughter's future than she has been in living her own life. Carol
Kennicott examines her life and values, but she never really
understands that she must make an assessment of individual
values within the parameters of her community values. Neither
she nor Hester live happy lives, but Hester's life takes meaning
from within herself while Carol drifts always looking for an
outside panacea for her unhappiness.
Carol sees herself but she never sees the community in which
she is to live, nor does she see a true picture of her role in that
community. She does not see that one "must also acquire a
capacity for an informed sympathy with an understanding of the
desires and values of others" (Hand).
Her consolation to herself that she "has not fought the good
fight but she has kept the faith" (Lewis) confirms her acceptance
that she will never bridge the gap between her individual values
and the community values.
Leta Baharestan, "The Individual
in His Own Briar Patch"

Explore Cultural Values in Your Own
Community Through Literature!
Jo Buckner
Oak Hill Junior High, Morganton, North Carolina
Often we as teachers expect our students to be enthused and
enlightened with the energy from great literary works. We
attempt to convey its message in ways applicable to their everyday
lives and thoughts. We are then disappointed and sometimes
outraged when the theme or soul of a story or poem is misinterpreted
or ignored completely by our students. This rings especially true
with junior high students who are a mixture of abstract and
concrete thinkers and all shades in between. I have found that
through working with familiar themes students can, with the
help of hands-on activities, relate the concrete life they lead to
the more abstract concepts in literature.
I chose the theme of "community," a familiar aspect of our
culture, to teach cognitive skills in thinking and writing,
performance skills in speaking, as well as an appreciation for
literature and its ability to provide a means of inquiry into
personal and cultural values. I selected the following short
literary works to integrate into the community unit: "This Farm
For Sale" by Jesse Stuart, "Journey to the Forks" by James Still,
"The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson, Sterling North's version of
"Thoreau of Walden Pond," and The Spoon River Anthology by
Edgar Lee Masters.
Reading "This Farm For Sale" was a springboard for students
to discover things that were good and worth keeping, indeed
worth advertising, about their own communities. As Stuart's
family learned to appreciate the abundant farm that provided
them with a plentiful table, my students found creeks, community
centers, church life, and good neighbors were aspects of their
communities worth "selling to others."
Students enjoyed the dialect in Still's "Journey to the Forks."
The story is an excellent means for examining the traditional

�53

COMMUNITY

values regarding education and religion in our own Southern
Appalachian community. We learned that our parents,
grandparents, and people in our community provide a great
influence on why we believe as we do. I knew one student had
gained some insight following this remark: "I guess if I hadn't
ever gone to a Baptist church and had always gone to a Jewish
church, I would think the Jewish beliefs were right!"
No other literary work in the unit held my students' interest
more than Jackson's disturbing account of a small-town tradition
in "The Lottery." This story is excellent for generating thinking
on higher cognitive levels. Students analyzed traditional values
through interviews with people in their communities. We discussed
possible ways to "do away with the lottery."
In our study of Thoreau's Walden, students initially were
eager to throw their books out the window and dispense with
their chores for a Thoreauvian paradise. After a closer examination,
however, of Thoreau's utopia, many were willing to be more
accepting of the demands of their present communities'lifestyles.
Materialism seemed to prevail; few were willing to give up their
nice clothes, comfortable homes, cars, and jamboxes.
Edgar Lee Masters' Spoon River poems were difficult for
some students to read, but most enjoyed the idea of "telling all"
from the grave. Students concluded that honesty was upheld by
Masters; scandal and sensationalism were relished by the Spoon
River community. Students recognized this as an aspect of their
own culture and over half made use of scandal in creating their
own "Spoon River" poems from unknown tombstones.
Ultimately I accomplished two goals through the community
unit. Students increased their skills in oral communication,
writing, and higher thinking skills. In the affective realm, my
students showed a strong appreciation and enthusiasm for
several masterworks of literature. In addition they were given
an opportunity to examine their own communities and community
values and the way in which their personal values fit into that
broader perspective.

Community: A Thematic Unit Designed for
an Eighth-Grade Language Arts Class
Approximately 6 Weeks

Rationale
Since junior high students are at an identity stage of
development, the study of their own communities will allow
them to examine and value them and will ultimately help them
know themselves better.
The unit integrates literature, writing, listening, speaking,
and viewing skills in accordance with the Standard Course of
Study in the North Carolina Basic Education Plan. It also
incorporates all the cognitive thinking levels in Benjamin Bloom's
Taxonomy.

Literature
Short Stories: 'This Farm For Sale" by Jesse Stuart;
"Journey to the Forks" by James Still.
Essay: "Thoreau of Walden Pond" by Sterling North.
Poetry: The Spoon RiverAnthology by Edgar Lee Masters.
Films: "The Rid Who Wouldn't Quit: The Brad Silverman
Story," an ABC After School Special; "The Lottery," based
on a short story by Shirley Jackson.
Textbook: Your English, North Carolina State adopted,
Coronado Press.

Objectives

Writing:
1. Writing descriptive, persuasive, and point-of-view
paragraphs.
2. Writing an advertisement.
3. Writing a poem.
Literature:
1. Recalling events in a story and poem.
2. Analyzing a short story (setting, character, plot—climax,

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

54

resolution, internal/external conflict—mood, theme).
Speaking:
Using the proper speaking skills—(1) standard English,
(2) pace, (3) volume, (4) eye contact, (5) posture, (6)
gestures, and (7) inflection of voice—in discussions, poetry
readings, a one-minute persuasion speech, and an interview.
Viewing: Analyzing a film.
Listening:
1. Following directions.
2. Answering questions after listening to readings.
3. Evaluating peers' speeches.
Grammar:
1. Using complete sentences in writing.
2. Using details and examples to develop a paragraph.
3. Recognizing and writing compound sentences using
commas and semicolons.
4. Recognizing adjectives and prepositional phrases used as
adjectives and using them in writing.
Day 1:

Day 2:

Introduction to Community Unit. Discussion on
what a community is, names of individual
communities. Have students look up official
definition in dictionary and thesaurus. Put these
columns on board or overhead: Name of Community;
Buildings; People (ages, typesofwork they do, etc.);
Churches; Schools; Businesses; Recreation Facilities;
Miscellaneous (unique features).
Use these columns as brainstorming technique
and write individual communities and fill in proper
columns as students give information. Have student
copy his/her community features on his/her own
paper. This is a pre-writing exercise. Have students
add to this list as an independent exercise; students
will use this list to write a descriptive paragraph.
Lesson. Recognizing and using adjectives.

Day 3:

Lesson. Recognizing and using prepositional phrases
as adjectives.
Day 4:
Assignment. Write one descriptive paragraph on
your community using adjectives/prepositional
phrases. Review topic sentence and supporting
details. Use lists from Day 1. Self-edit paper and
edit partner's paper. Write final draft for homework
Days 5, 6: Analyze a short story. Read 'This Farm For Sale"
by Jesse Stuart. Give background information on
Jesse Stuart. Discuss setting, characters, plot
(climax, internal/external conflict), mood, and
theme. Make columns on board for: Title; Author;
Setting; Characters; Plot—climax, internal I external
conflict; Mood; Theme. Have students fill in detailed
information in columns—emphasize theme.
Days 7-9:
Lesson. Recognizing and writing compound
sentences; using commas and semicolons in
compound sentences.
Days 10,11: Writing a persuasive paper. Three paragraphs,
trying to convince someone to come to your
community to live. Use "old" lists and add
intangibles to them, such as: nice people, job
opportunities, etc. (things that tell about the quality
of life in your community). Teacher input: writing
topic sentences, details and examples for
development. Give examples to students.
Note: Eighth-grade North Carolina students are
tested for writing a persuasive or point-of-view
essay.
Day 12:
Self-editing I helping circles on rough drafts. Write
final draft in class or for homework.
Assignment. Bring pencils, crayons, old magazines,
etc. to do advertisement in class tomorrow.
Day 13:
Project. Use persuasive papers to make an ad to
entice someone to your community. "Sell" your

�COMMUNITY

Day 14:

Day 15:

55

community; use pamphlets advertising tourist
attractions as models.
Lesson. Speaking and listening skills. Students,
be prepared to use "pamphlet" to give a oneminute speech to sell your community. "Listeners"
will evaluate.
Persuasive speeches. "Listeners" evaluate on a
scale of 1 to 10 in these areas: posture, eye contact,
pace, volume, inflection of voice, and correct

Day 16:

Lesson. Conducting an interview. Class composes
ten questions to ask an older member of his/her
community how life was in the community in the
past (at least 30 years ago). Interviews due in
approximately one week.
Days 17, 18: The Spoon River Anthology. Teacher reads
selections. Introduce readings and stir students'
interest by discussing what people who are lying
in their graves would say if they could speak.
Hand out one poem of the anthology to each
student. Student must interpret his/her poem.
Have students use the dictionary or thesaurus to
help with unfamiliar words. Work with partner
and rehearse reading of his/her poem.
Day 19:
The Spoon River Anthology. Students read and
interpret his/her poem in class.
Assignment. Students go to a graveyard in his/her
community. Write down name, age, any information
on tombstone of a person the student does not
know.
Day 20:
Write a ten-line poem using Spoon River poems as
a model. Have partner edit poems.
Day 21:
Presentations. Students read poems in class.
"Listeners" evaluate.
Days 22, 23: Class discussion. "Intolerance in a Community."

Day 24:

Day 25:
Day 26:

Day 27:

Day 28:
Day 29:

1) What is intolerance? 2) What are some things
your community will not tolerate ? 3) Who are some
people your community will not tolerate? Why?
Show film. "The Kid Who Wouldn't Quit"
a. Analyze the film. Use same method as short
story.
b. Discuss community's reaction to Brad.
c. What was Brad's and his parents' reaction to
them?
d. What is the word for people who don't like a
certain group of people? Prejudice.
e. What are some prejudices you see today?
f. How can you avoid being prejudiced?
"Thoreau ofWalden Pond."9 Read in class. A man
who was not tolerant of the community; his critique
of his community. Discuss Thoreau's ideas and
way of life. Does it appeal to you? Why? Why not?
Point-of-view paper. Review topic sentences, writing
details. Students write 3-paragraph paper on this
prompt: / would /would not like to live like Thoreau.
Values in a community. Discuss what "values"
means. Have students listen for values in the
story as teacher reads "Journey to the Forks."
(Students have some problems reading dialect.)
Give a quiz recalling events in the story. Students
write value(s) in the story—attitudes regarding
religion and education are obvious. List values in
the students' own communities.
Write a paragraph describing the most important
value in your community. Be sure to tell why you
think it is important. Give examples of this value.
Peers edit papers. Final draft at home.
Students share interviews with class. Discuss
similarities and differences in people interviewed.
Film. "The Lottery." Before showing film, discuss

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

56

Day 30:

Day 31:

Day 32:

traditions in a community. Teacher prepares papers
for drawing (all white except one with a black dot).
Conduct drawing so students understand what a
lottery is. Winner gets homework pass. Show film.
Students write their reactions to film. Dicussion of
tradition: good and bad traditions; when should
traditions be kept and when should they be
disregarded?; Old Man Warner's role; Tessie's
change of attitude toward the lottery; etc.
Making your community better. List at least five
problems or bad things about your community.
Discuss these in class. Select one of these "problems"
and write a one-paragraph editorial giving this
problem and explaining how this problem could be
corrected or your community made a better place
to live. Complete rough draft in class; have a
partner edit. Final draft for homework.
Presentations of editorials. Community snack.

Community in Nathaniel Hawthorne's Work
Sherrie Hartsoe
West Iredell High School, Statesville, North Carolina
Because Nathaniel Hawthorne writes in a manner that
freshmen find difficult to understand, I begin my Hawthorne
unit by reading seven short stories by Hawthorne; then my
students are accustomed to the way he writes, and they feel
better equipped to read The Scarlet Letter. We begin by using the
theme of community to unite the short stories and the novel. We
discuss the term "community" and relate it to our lives. I also
mention the definitions of community usedinHabits of the Heart.
My students are able to visualize different types of communities—
a school community, a neighborhood community, a community of
friends, a church community, and a community of isolation. My
students find it difficult to understand how one can be isolated

from a community, until I ask them questions like: Is there
anything you could do that would isolate you from your family,
friends, or neighborhood? Do you know anyone who has been
alienated from his/her community? Normally they are able to
come up with at least one example. Thus, they are better able to
understand Hester's plight.
We read the following short stories and discuss how community
is involved in each.
1. "My Kinsman, Major Molineux." This story has young
Robin who leaves his innocent world to discover another
type of people. As a result, Robin (which means "innocence")
is forced to lose his innocence and see a community with
revenge, evil, and punishment.
2. "The Minister's Black Veil." This story shows a community
treating the Reverend Mr. Hooper like an outcast (like
Hester Prynne) because of a symbol, the black veil (the
scarlet letter). The people think he has become something
evil because of a mere piece of cloth. Rev. Hooper becomes
a better minister because of the black veil. Similarly,
Hester becomes a better advisor for the women because of
her "red badge of courage."
3. "The Birthmark." In this story Georgiana is treated with
disdain because of her mark of imperfection. Her husband's
dislike for her flaw results in her death because no one can
be perfect on earth. Similarly, Hester is rejected for her
mark of imperfection.
4. "The Ambitious Guest." This story portrays a community
of families who open their hearts to a stranger. Later it is
seen that this community of friends and family share a
common destiny.
5. "Young Goodman Brown." This is a story of a man who
rejects his community of friends, church, and family
because he mistrusts them.
6. "Ethan Brand." This story shows a man who goes in
search of the unpardonable sin; by doing so, he manages

�COMMUNITY

to alienate him self from everyone and is not accepted in
any community. He then commits suicide, which could be
the unpardonable sin. He says he has the unpardonable
sin in his heart. (Dimmesdale carries his here also.)
7. "Dr. Heidegger's Experiment." This story shows the older
community in search of a younger one.
Now we review the notes on Hawthorne's life. I emphasize
certain characteristics like his being a recluse for twelve years,
his Brook Farm community experience, and his family life. Also,
I review the notes from a previous unit on Puritan beliefs and
punishments. I remind them that the sin of adultery was punished
by the sinner's wearing a letter "A." I also mention to them that
the word "adultery" is not mentioned in The Scarlet Letter. I ask
my students to mark the passages dealing with community. They
are usually surprised to see the change in the letter "A" (adultery
to angel, able). They are also surprised to see the community's
attitude change from one of hatred to one of acceptance of Hester.
Lastly, we discuss events that were once perceived as scandalous
to mere acceptance in today's world. Freshmen usually find it
difficult to understand why Hester was so severly punished for
her sin. I explain to them that this story took place over 300 years
before and the times have changed. Then we are able to discuss
other aspects of ethics that have changed throughout time.
One other thing I do is have my students cut out letters to
wear for the day that depict their secret sin. I let them choose the
color of paper to indicate their sin. Then we wear them and have
fun letting people guess what sin we have committed.
I. Short Story Unit (2 weeks)
A. Lecture on Nathaniel Hawthorne
B. Definitions of "community"
C. Read seven short stories by Hawthorne
1. "My Kinsman, Major Molineux"
2. "The Minister's Black Veil"

57

3. 'The Birthmark"
4. "The Ambitious Guest"
5. "Young Goodman Brown"
6. "Ethan Brand"
7. "Dr. Heidegger's Experiment"
D. Test on short stories
E. Essay due with suggested topics dealing with
community
II. The Scarlet Letter (4 weeks)
A. Lecture on Puritan beliefs and punishments
B. Read The Scarlet Letter
C. Review of community and seven short stories
D. Test on the novel
E. Essay on The Scarlet Letter with suggested topics
F. View the PBS film of The Scarlet Letter
During the past two years I have been forced to do The Scarlet
Letter as a book report book. In order to cover other major
writers, it was easier to issue study questions and give the
students three weeks to read the book independently; but at the
conclusion of the three weeks, we discuss the novel thoroughly.
Therefore class time can be spent studying other major authors.

Resources
Bellah, Robert etal. Habits of the Heart. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1985.
Gerber, John C. Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Scarlet Letter: A Collection of Critical
Essays. Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1968.
Hart, James D. The Oxford Companion to American Literature. New York: Oxford University
Press, 1965.
Kaul, A. N. Hawthorne: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
1966.
Leverenz, David. "Mrs. Hawthorne's Headache: Reading 7770 Scarlet Letter." Nineteenth
Century Fiction. March 1983, pp. 552-575.
Martin, Terence. Nathaniel Hawthorne. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1983.
Mellow, James R. Nathaniel Hawthorne in His Times. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1980.

�58

�Work

For Silas Lapham his paint is "like his heart's blood."
The millhands at Plant 2 [in Rhoadhiss] were honored
and proud to know that they wove the cloth for the flag
that is on the moon.
Sherrie Hartsoe, A Death in
Rhoadhiss, North Carolina

�60

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

"A Busy Multitude": Work in
American Life and Literature
Drive a nail home and clinch it so faithfully that you can
wake up in the night and think of your work with
satisfaction—a work at which you would not be ashamed
to invoke the Muse. . . . Every nail driven should be as
another rivet in the machine of the universe, you carrying
on the work.
Henry David Thoreau, "Conclusion,"
Walden

The historian Everett Dick recounts the experiences of a
German immigrant, Gert Goebel, as he undertook the work of
settlement on the American frontier. Better educated than his
neighbors, Goebel observed their work with a feeling of superiority.
The work appeared to be simple, and he began his own settlement
confident that he could do the necessary work easily and better
that his ignorant neighbors. After all, such things as cutting
corn, clearing new ground, and splitting logs for rails were simple
tasks. All one had to do was go at the work intelligently.
But when Goebel, with his father and brothers, tried to make
corn shocks as they had observed their neighbors doing it, their
shocks fell down, and they couldn't understand wliy. Nor could
they figure out why, when they tried to split rails, the work
proved so difficult. When they tried to cut down trees, their
progress was painfully slow, and they blistered their hands.
When at last they had prepared a few logs to be split into rails,
no amount of thinking about the problem could explain why
wedges became stuck in still unsplit logs. When they ruined a
wooden maul from so much pounding on the wedges, and made
a new one, they could not understand why their new maul was
soon reduced to splinters. By the end of the day they had got their
wedges stuck repeatedly, ruined two mauls, made themselves
sore and morose—and still had not a single rail to show for their

efforts. Two helpful neighbors finally taught them which trees
were best for making rails, which wood made a durable maul,
which end of a log to begin splitting. And in a two-hour
demonstration of rail-splitting in which these neighbors completed
between forty and fifty rails, Goebel learned more than he could
have in months of thinking about the work (Dick, 304-07).
From the beginnings of the American experience in the
colonial period, Europeans had found it necessary to set aside or
modify their inherited ideas and attitudes in order to make a
satisfactory adjustment to the conditions and demands in the
new American environment. The experience of the Goebel family
typifies the experience of millions who came both before and after
them. As was the case with the Goebel family, the conditions of
the new environment and the demands it made on settlers were
such that, especially in the American workplace, practice proved
superior to theory, experience and skill to formal education.
While the typical American workplace has long since ceased to be
a frontier settlement, that frontier experience, repeated countless
times as settlement moved westward, together with concepts,
attitudes, and values of our collective cultural heritage, have
profoundly influenced our attitudes about work.
It has frequently been said that Americans are perhaps the
hardest working people in the world. We are said to have a "work
ethic." While this may be so, we certainly did not invent the work
ethic. Long before America was settled, work was valued by
people and cultures contributing to our Graeco-Roman, JudeoChristian heritage. The evils of idleness, the Roman philosopher
Seneca advises, can be shaken off by hard work (Epistles, 56.9).
Both the Old and New Testaments value work. God's creation,
according to the Genesis account, was the work of six days. In
keeping with this example, the sixth commandment states that
man shall work six days and rest on the seventh. The Old
Testament attitude toward work is ambiguous. On the one hand
work is a curse resulting from man's disobedience and fall from
grace. For the most part, though, work in the Old Testament is

�WORK

associated with honor and virtue. The sleep of a laboring man,
according to Ecclesiastes 5:12, is sweet. Paul, in the New Testament,
repeatedly reminds members of the early church that they will
be judged by their work. "Every man's work shall be made
manifest," he writes in 1 Corinthians 3, "for the day shall declare
it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every
man's work of what sort it is." The connection between work and
salvation is seen in the motto of the Benedictine Order—Orare
est laborare, laborare est orare: To pray is to work, to work is to
pray—where work and prayer are synonymous.
The attitude toward work brought to America by the earliest
settlers was no doubt a part of their Calvinist doctrine. John
Calvin, the great sixteenth-century reformer and contemporary
of Luther, emphasized the glorification of God through action—
through sacrifice, labor, discipline. Thrift, sobriety, and above all,
industriousness, were signal virtues, means toward the end of
glorifying God. One served God by performing works. John
Winthrop's vision of "a city upon a hill" to be built by the members
of Plymouth Colony, is spoken of as "this work we have undertaken ..." (Bartlett, 264). Elsewhere in the colonies work was,
from the beginning, of paramount concern. The situation had
become so serious by September 1608 that Captain John Smith,
President of the Colony of Virginia, in a Statement to the
Council, bluntly decreed: "You must obey this, now, for a law—he
that will not work shall not eat" (Seldes, 389).
In the northern and southern colonies alike in the seventeenth
century there were laws against idleness, though in the South, a
writer noted, planters were not very fond of work "or any manly
exercise except Horse (sic!) racing..." (Wertenbaker, 262-63). In
1629 Governor Endicott was advised by the Massachusetts Bay
Company that "noe idle drone bee permitted to live amongst
us. . . ." (Wish, V.I, 51). Recent emigres and travelers in the
post-Revolutionary period were often surprised at how respectable
ordinary labor was in the new country (Krout, 40). Thomas
Jefferson even defended Southern planters against the charge of

61

idleness and wrote of the varied and unremitting duties of a
planter (Wish, VI, 228). Although American society has surely
become more secular than it was in the colonial period, the
religious rationale for sobriety, thrift, and industry has continued
to inform our attitude toward work. A student of Horatio Alger's
popular nineteenth-century novels describes Alger's formula as:
"middle-class respectability equals spiritual grace" (Cords and
Gerster, vol. 2,113). Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the
Spirit of Capitalism (1905) argued that the "rationalized, systematized pursuit of material gain was plainly linked to the 'worldly
asceticism'promotedby Calvinist religion" (Fox, 4-5). Tocqueville
(V. II, 264-65) noted a driven quality in the typical American: a
persistent need to be up and doing, as if not only material gain
but spiritual salvation depended on it, and a resulting inability
really to be at leisure. As if in illustration of Tocqueville's
observation, Henry Ford asserted, "I do not believe a man can
ever leave his business. He ought to think of it by day and dream
of it by night" (Ford). American devotion to work has been so
consistent that by the twentieth century, when leisure became
commonplace, "for the professional and intellectual man it became
almost fashionable to work long hours" (Commager, 422).
The word "work" has a long and complicated history in the
English language and is related to other words such as "labor"
and "leisure." Modern English "work," derived from the Old
English noun weorc, and from the related verb wyrcan, is our
general word for both doing something and for something done.
Although it has most frequently come to denote paid employment,
this is not always the case, for in modern English one can speak
of working in the garden. On the other hand a woman who runs
a household and rears children is distinguished from a woman
who works outside the home. Thus, while the meaning is not
exclusive, "work" as a noun or verb in most instances has come
to be associated with activity undertaken for a wage or salary,
with the condition of being hired.
"Work" is related to "labor," which, in the Middle Ages, carried

�62

a strong sense of pain and toil. ("Toil" itself, derived from a Latin
root word meaning "to stir or to crush," bore the meaning of
trouble or turmoil before it came to mean "hard labor.") While
"labor" and "toil" connoted more arduous activity than "work,"
manual workers came to be referred to as "laborers" as early as
the thirteenth century, and the supply of such people was
shortened to *laboi^ by the seventeenth century. Although "laborer"
was also a worker from the fourteenth century on, "work" could
still be used in a general sense by Shakespeare: "Fie upon this
quiet life, I want worke." (Henry IV, II,iv). "Work" compounded
with other words to produce workman, workingman, workfolk,
workpeople, and in the nineteenth century the working class
came to be used in making an important socio-political distinction.
The most important shift in the meaning of the word "work"
has been from generalized activity to that of paid employment
and has come about as a result of the development of capitalist
productive relations. According to Raymond Williams (145-48,
281-84) to be "in work or out of work was to be in a definite
relationship with some other who had control of the means of
productive effort. *Work' then partly shifted from the productive
effort itself to the predominant social relationship." Shift from
the activity to the relationship has made it possible to say that a
woman running a household and rearing children is not working.
An older sense of the word is preserved, however, for it is still
possible to distinguish between one's real work and what one
does only as a job for wage or salary. Activities undertaken
during time other than that spent in paid employment are said
to be done "on our own time," or during our "free time" or 'leisure
time" (the word "leisure" comes from the Latin licere, meaning
"to permit"). Because "work" has become specialized and refers
most often to paid employment, it is possible to refer to 'leisuretime activities" which may entail considerable effort. And it is in
this sense that we may refer to works of art, or to any undertaking
for which we are not remunerated by contractual or otherwise
formal agreement.

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

The separation of the male and female spheres of work
during the late medieval and early modern periods may be a
reason why, in contemporary English, we do not speak of a
woman who stays at home and rears children as working, while
a woman who is employed outside the home is said to work. This
usage suggests that a woman works only when she enters the
sphere of activity separated in space from the home and dominated
by males. But this distinction has not always been possible. In
the fourteenth century the typical European bourgeois townhouse
combined living and work space (Rybczynski, 25). The homes of
artisans and shopkeepers combined living space with shops and
studios, and even the wealthy included counting rooms in their
residences (Duby, et passim). But by the time of the Renaissance,
the home had increasingly become the realm of women and "a
setting for private acts and personal moments." Male work and
male social life had moved outside the home. The work of women
remained much as it had been before, but its isolation from the
work of men was new (Rybczynski, 70-71).
The world of the early colonists was already characterized by
the separation of work from the domestic sphere, and the nature
and meaning of work had been transformed by capitalism.
Immigration to the colonies was due in large part to economic
dislocations brought about by the enclosure movement and the
introduction of large-scale commercial farming. "Sheep eat men,"
was the cry of people who had been evicted from farmland
converted to the raising of sheep (Wish, v. 1,12). Many of these
uprooted people, or their descendents, eventually made their
way to the American colonies (Bailyn, 36-44). In the 1760s in
Ireland, Scotland, and Northern England, the desire to emigrate
to the colonies reached a fever pitch. British government officials
expressed alarm and a sense of urgency. Areport from Ireland in
1773 stated that in the previous half-dozen years Ulster had
" *been drained of one-fourth of its trading cash and the like
proportion of the manufacturing people' by emigration." The
belief that North America was "the best poor man's country in the

�63

WORK

world" had become so universal that British authorities in the
early 1770s considered banning emigration to the colonies
altogether and began compiling an official register of emigration
in an effort to determine the reasons for emigrating.
A growing economic force, capitalism, was the engine that
drove the dislocation in the English countryside and which
facilitated much of the colonizing in the New World. Some of the
first settlements and plantations were the efforts of joint stock
companies. When John Donne declared in "An Anatomie of the
World: The First Anniversary/' in 1611, " 'Tis all in peeces, all
cohaerence gone," (191) he was talking not only about a loosening
of ties of kinship, but of the collapse of an entire feudal system in
a process of early modernization. Indeed, the age of exploration
and the subsequent settlement of the North American continent
we now see as manifestations of a new era. The social, economic, religious, and philosophical forces operating in fifteenth-,
sixteenth-, and seventeenth-century Europe, we have come to
see as the beginnings of the modern age. The early explorers and
adventurers, the colonists and settlers, the indentured servants
and redemptioners who came to America by the hundreds, then
by the thousands, then by the hundreds of thousands and
eventually by the millions, were moderns.
The West was modern, or becoming so, before America was
settled. Or, more accurately, America's settlement occurred as part
of the dawning of the modern world. And certainly the Industrial
Revolution, a most conspicuous aspect of the modern age, began
in England and was well advanced before the American Revolution.
So neither the modern era nor the Industrial Revolution, which
transformed life in the West, is to be exclusively associated with
the United States. Yet it was in the United States that the nature
of work was transformed—with consequences for the country
and for the entire globe that persist to the present time.
According to Boorstin (20-31), Europeans in the nineteenth
century began to notice and comment on an "American System
of Manufacturing* quite different from their own, and which

might have been more accurately called a "New England System."
This system did not rely on the special skills of craftsmen who
performed each step in the production of a manufactured item.
(Highly skilled craftsmen had never been plentiful in the colonies
or in the new young nation; in fact, their scarcity and the
resulting absences of vested interests explain why the workplace
was transformed in America before it was in Europe.) Instead,
the new system rationalized and systematized the manufacturing
process—broke the manufacture of any item down into simple
steps, which could be performed by an unskilled or semi-skilled
worker, and then, to take advantage of waterpower at specific
sites, organized the various steps under one factory roof. This
departure, which came to be known as the Uniformity System,
was not so much the result of boldness or inventiveness as it was
of necessity and the disposition to experiment; it had the effect of
transforming production, the nature of work, and the role of the
worker. As Boorstin explains:
In Europe the making of a complex machine, such as a gun
or clock, had remained wholly in the hands of a single
highly skilled craftsman
The new Uniformity System
broke down the manufacture of a gun or of any other
complicated machine into the separate manufacture of
each of its component pieces. Each piece could then be
made independently and in large quantities, by workers
who lacked the skill to make a whole machine.
Henceforth the world of production and manufacturing would
require not skill but know-how. This modern factory organization
would bring changes in the relationships between labor and
capital, countryside and city, in the position of women and of the
family. It would be the chief difference between Western life in
the twentieth century and the eighteenth century, and by the
twentieth century, would have implications for the entire human
community.
One almost immediate consequence of the organization of

�64

work at a single site was the inadvertent organization of workers,
living and working in close proximity, into a community of
common interest. The first Trades Union was organized in
Boston in the 1830s, and laws against conspiracy were revised in
such a way as to give the American labor movement its charter
of legality in 1842 (Boorstin, 46). And well into the twentieth
century the manufacturing system that brought large numbers
of men and women together on one site organized not only the
work, but contributed to the organization of the workers, who
took the family as a model for the community they created in
pursuit of their interests (Hall, et passim).
But for generations, even while its transformation was going
on, work was not problematical for the average American. It was
obvious why one worked. The fruits of one's labor were seen
immediately and directly in the food, clothing, and shelter work
provided for oneself and one's family. One saw the usefulness of
one's work in one's community. One's work made sense. But as
the manufacture of products became increasingly rationalized
and systematized, exploded into small steps that could be routinely
performed, and as the end product of work became increasingly
remote from the worker, work lost much of its immediate
satisfaction and meaning. The rationalization of work eventually
rationalized the life of the worker, dividing life neatly into work,
on the one hand, and play, or leisure, on the other, with the result
that both were robbed of satisfaction and meaning. Thus, an
understanding of work in the American experience necessarily
entails a consideration of leisure, and a consideration of whether
or not the meaning of both work and leisure is not to be sought
in their connection rather than in their separation.
During his presidential campaign in 1880, James A. Garfield
observed, "We may divide the whole struggle of the human race
into two chapters: first, the fight to get leisure; and then the
second fight of civilization—what shall we do with our leisure
when we get it?" By that time the collective experience of
Americans consisted of subduing wilderness, fighting a war for

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

independence and establishing a nation, fighting a civil war, and
then transforming an essentially rural, agrarian society into an
increasingly urban and industrial one. Most Americans were still
caught up in the transformation; their experience better prepared
them to work than to take leisure. For many, perhaps most,
leisure was but a euphemism for laziness (Tarbell, 287-88).
Yet thoughtful Americans from the earliest times knew the
difference between leisure and indolence, and furthermore, knew
how to value leisure. In 1743 Benjamin Franklin wrote:
The first drudgery of settling new colonies, which confines
the attention of people to mere necessaries, is now pretty
well over; and there are many in every province in
circumstances that seem at ease and afford leisure to
cultivate the finer arts and improve the common stock of
knowledge..." (Adams, frontispiece).
Franklin wrote in Poor Richard's Almanac for 1746, "A life of
leisure and a life of laziness are two things," and his life after he
retired from his printing business illustrated that proposition.
Thoreau, looking about him in his New England community
of Concord, concluded that most people were "so occupied with
the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its
finer fruits cannot be pluckedby them." The laboring man lacked
the leisure to be "anything but a machine," and yet Thoreau
believed this situation existed "through mere ignorance and
mistake," and that leisure was within reach of even the poorest
person (327). As Franklin taught his countrymen, by word and
deed, a lesson with respect to leisure, Thoreau incorporated into
his experiment at Walden Pond an illustration of the leisure
available to the person of modest means. And in his reflections
upon the experiment, like Franklin, he suggested not only that
leisure and laziness are two things, but that true leisure may be,
paradoxically, more productive than mindless industry. Thoreau
writes of "days when idleness was the most attractive and
productive industry" (475).

�WORK

Franklin, however, came to be revered not for his views on
leisure but rather for his emphasis in Poor Richard on sobriety,
thrift, and industry. And Thoreau was writing against the grain
of his time, for in the nineteenth century the gospel of work was
preached from many pulpits. Indeed, the "work ethic" that
supported the vigorously developing industrial world permeated
England and America to such an extent that we might speak of
a morality of exertion and effort in which the connection between
work and spiritual salvation is transparent. In 1829, near the
end of his life, Goethe declared to his Boswell, Eckermann
(Eissler II: 1189), "If I work incessantly to the last, nature owes
me another form of existence when the present one collapses." It
is Goethe's greatest creation, the character of Faust, who couches
his pact with Mephisopheles in terms of constant striving and
ceaseless effort:
If to the moment I should say:
Abide, you are so fair—
Put me in fetters on that day,
I wish to perish then, I swear.
Then let the death bell ever toll,
Your [Mephistopheles'J service done, you shall be free,
The clock may stop, the hand may fall,
As time comes to an end for me.
(185)
When Faust dies and Mephistopheles is about to claim his soul,
God intervenes and saves Faust, despite all Faust's shortcomings
and transgressions, observing:
Who ever strives with all his power,
We are allowed to save.
(493)
Thomas Carlyle, greatly influenced by Goethe, is a conspicuous
advocate of work. He declares (196-97), "All work is noble, even
cotton spinning, is noble; work is alone noble
Alife of ease is

65

not for any man, nor for any god." The coiner of the term
"captains of industry," which is the title of the fourth chaper of his
book Past and Present (267-73), in which he also observes,
"Blessed is he who has found his work; let him ask no other
blessedness," in turn was admired by Thoreau's contemporary
and sometime mentor Ralph Waldo Emerson (331), who says, in
"Fragments on the Poetic Gift":
That book is good
Which puts me in a working mood.
Charles Lamb (563) is a feeble voice in the nineteenth
century when he asks, "Who first invented work, and bound the
free/And holiday-rejoicing spirit down?" For the most part, the
century's leading writers in England and America could not say
enough about the salutory effects of work, effort, and exertion.
Browning (VI: 57) suggests that work has the power to forestall
death: "No work begun shall ever pause for death." Hugh dough's
ernest and optimistic lines (Bartlett, 564) are well known:
Say not the struggle naught availeth,
The labor and the wounds are vain,
The Enemy faints not, nor faileth,
And things have been as they remain.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (370) sounds the call to action,
effort, and exertion in "A Psalm of Life":
Let us, then, be up and doing,
With a heart for any fate;
Still achieving, still pursuing,
Learn to labor and to wait.
Perhaps the most memorable poetic nineteenth-century expression
of devotion to ceaseless effort, striving, and exertion is to be
found in Tennyson's (66-67) "Ulysses," in which the restless
Odysseus/Ulysses, in a monologue spoken in a quiet time after
the Trojan War and all the adventures of the trip home, says:

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

66

How dull it is to pause, to make an end,
To rust unburnished, not to shine in use!
As though to breathe were life!
Death closes all; but something ere the end,
Some work of noble note, may yet be done,
Not unbecoming men that strove with gods.
•»•
*Tis not too late to seek a newer world,
Push off, and sitting well in order smite
The sounding furrows; for my purpose holds
To sail beyond the sunset, and the baths
of all the western stars, until I die.
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tennyson's poem, which appeared in 1842, is set in the world
of ancient Greece; but it is very much a poem of its time, for in its
tone and tenor it expresses the adventures and enterprising
spirit of the men who explored the West, of the men and women
who first settled the North American continent, of the early
industrialists and entrepreneurs who were at that time in the
process of seeking and finding a newer world. The world that was
coming into being in England and America in the nineteenth
century, and in western Europe generally, left little doubt about
the efficacy of effort and industriousness, or about the reality of
progress. And while the greatest hymns to ceaseless striving may
have been written in the nineteenth century, the intellectual,
spiritual, economic, and social conditions that give rise to them
are inseparable from the experience of modernity which had
increasingly affected life in the West since the Renaissance.
The Enlightenment in eighteenth-century Germany
emphasized not only religious toleration, but also a never-ending
pursuit of truth, a view necessary for the idea of progress which
is also associated with the Enlightenment. Goethe's predecessor,
the brilliant critic and dramatist G. E. Lessing, preferred the

pursuit of truth to truth itself. Lessing valued the effort one
exerted to get at the truth more than the possession of truth and
thought the effort to know the truth a better indication of the
worth of the individual.
Nicht die Wahrheit, in deren Besitz
irgendein Mensch ist oder zu sein
vermeint, sondern die aufrichtige Muehe,
die er angewandt hat, hinter die Wahrheit
zu kommen, macht den Wert des Menschen.
Lessing thought that the possession of truth brought one to rest,
made one indolent and proud. Der Besitz macht ruhig, traege und
stolz. He concluded that if God held out all truth in his right hand,
and in his left the desire to pursue truth, even though the pursuit
would be filled with error, and said, "Chooser he would choose
the pursuit of truth over truth itself.
Wenn Gott in seiner Rechten alle Wahrheit
und in seiner Linken den einzigen, immer
regen Trieb nach Wahrheit, obschon mit dem
Zusatz, mich immer und ewig zu irren,
verschlossen hielte, und spraeche zu mir:
Waehle!—Ich fiele ihm mit Demut in seine
Linke und sagte: Vatergib—die reine Wahrheit
istja dock nur fuer dich allein (Lessing, 87).
This ceaseless activity extolled in the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries was not the sphere merely of great men—kings and
wealthy industrialists and entrepreneurs. The heroic spirit of
Tennyson's poem spoke to ordinary men and women, for it was
within the reach of the humblest to improve their station in life.
As the historian Francis Parkman (xviii) pointed out in 1865:
The growth of New England was a result of the aggregate
efforts of a busy multitude, each in his narrow circle toiling
for himself, to gather competence or wealth.

�WORK

In an enduring example of nineteenth-century American prose,
The Gettysburg Address, Lincoln (Bartlett, 523) calls on his
audience to consider the Civil War an unfinished work:
It is for us, the living, rather to be dedicated here to the
unfinished work which they [the dead] who fought here
have thus far so nobly advanced. It is for us to be here
dedicated to the great task remaining before us....
But even before the end of the nineteenth century there were
indications of a change in the attitude toward work—a change
that would make Thoreau, stepping to his different drummer,
seem prophetic. In 1882 the influential social critic Herbert
Spencer addressed a banquet audience in New York City on the
subject of leisure. Spencer (who along with Thomas H. Huxley,
popularized Darwin's theory of evolution, applied it to human
society, and coined the term "survival of the fittest") told his
audience, "We have had somewhat too much of the 'gospel of
work'" (Shapiro, November 11 entry).
Certainly in America by the time of the Great Depression,
when millions of Americans had leisure forced upon them, the
emphasis in discussions of work had shifted. Americans were
notoriously willing workers, but they were unprepared for leisure.
Not only economic depression but the increasing use of
machines in production idled men and women and threatened to
alter the nature of work and render the traditional worker
superfluous. In 1933 Ralph Aiken (A-7) predicted that leisure,
not work, would be the challenge of the future. "Whether we like
it or not," he wrote, "the world is evidently entering upon a period
of leisure for all men." The influence of the machine was causing
"the ideals of an industrious past" to fade beyond recognition.
The Russians, Aiken believed, were making a serious mistake in
attempting to build a paradise for factory workers because the
entire social structure "raised on the life and labor of the factory
worker" was already out of date in the 1930s. Soon, Aiken
asserted, "a mill-hand will be as rare as a bison. He is marked for

67

extinction." Aiken foresaw a time when engineering progress
would have all but eliminated the factory worker; when machines
would "force freedom on a laborious and willfully toiling people."
But the problem with the factory model of the worker was not
just that such workers would be supplanted by machines. The
nature of the work performed by the factory worker was in itself
problematic. The Uniformity System, as described by Boorstin,
rationalized work and divided processes into simple, distinct
steps which were performed repeatedly by the worker. The
worker was deprived of a sense of accomplishment or completion
or closure as the task was fragmented and diminished. The work
did not demand the attention and capacities of the entire person,
but only a part of the worker—a hand or an eye.
The Uniformity System resulted in work that lacked the
scope and variety of work in the pre-industrial frontier and
settlement period. Life on the frontier, and later on farms, in
villages and small towns, required that men and women, and
children, acquire a variety of useful skills which might be
employed with the changing of the seasons, or as the needs of the
family or community altered. If, in such situations, men and
women were, typically, jacks-of-all-trades, masters-of-none, work
had obvious meaning and usefulness in terms of one's family and
community, and presented the worker with constant challenge
and variety.
The historian Everett Dick illustrates the variety of work
experiences in the lives of individuals on the American frontier.
One man, Gideon Lincecum, who did not learn to read until he
was fourteen, was a student of medicine three years later.
Subsequently he was a store clerk, then store proprietor, farmer,
and town boomer. After going bankrupt, he made a comeback by
exhibiting a troupe of Indians about the country—all before
returning to the practice of medicine (219). According to Dick,
Little Rock, Arkansas' first mayor "combined with his duties as
chief magistrate those of justice of the peace, schoolteacher,
bookkeeper, clerk in the post office, house- and sign-painter,

�68

glazier, and general tinker." A traveler recollected a man in
Alabama who was "a schoolmaster, a lawyer, an almanac-maker,
a speculator, and a dealer in eggs...." (336).
Such work experiences were not untypical long past the
frontier and settlement phases. Wilma Dykeman (60-61) provides
a vivid account of a man named J. C. Smathers, who lived in rural
Western North Carolina well into the twentieth century and who
impressed travelers with "the versatility of his offices and
accomplishments." A traveler stopped at Smathers' tavern learned
that Smathers was not only the proprieter of the tavern but also
the postmaster, storekeeper, and operator of the blacksmith
shop. In addition, Smathers ran the local mill and farmed. A
pillar in the Methodist church, he was the father of thirteen
children, and, in addition to his other skills and activities, he
was, or at some time during his life had been, a rock and brick
mason, carpenter, shoemaker, tinner, painter, plumber, harnessand saddle-maker, candle-maker, beekeeper, glazier, butcher,
lawyer, politician, and schoolmaster.
But the Uniformity System of factory work radically altered
the nature of the typical work experience. The system organized
work at a single site, broke work into small bits or steps, removed
the worker from any experience of the usefulness of the work,
and generally divided not only the work, but separated the
worker from pleasure or satisfaction in the work, thereby changing
work into labor or drudgery.
While we do not always distiguish between labor and work,
our survey of the history of the two words suggests they are two
different things, just as leisure and idleness are. Labor is something
thrust upon us. We have to do it. And once we have done it, we
have to do it again—tomorrow, next week. Labor is taking out
the garbage, mopping the floor, doing the laundry. Housework is
really house/a&amp;or.
The word "work" might better be reserved for other activities—
things we do, not only because we need to do them, but because,
additionally, we choose to do them. The word "work" ought to be

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

reserved, too, for things which, once done, may not have to be
done ever again. Work can be done "once and for all." Sometimes
we use the word "work" in this sense, as when we speak of works
of art, or the collected works of an author. But usage confuses the
meanings, since a work of art may have been a labor of love.
Nevertheless, labor enthralls, is essentially drudgery, while
genuine work, paradoxically, contains elements of freedom and
play. The distinction between labor and work figures in Robert
Frost's poem "Two Tramps in Mud-Time" (275-77). The poem's
speaker is chopping wood in his yard when two strangers, the
tramps, approach and volunteer to chop the wood for pay. For the
tramps, chopping wood is labor; they don't want to chop wood, but
they need a job and money. The poem's speaker probably needs
wood, too, but he goes at the chopping of it with an altogether
different attitude than the one the tramps would bring to it. He
chooses to chop wood. The work affords him pleasure. His need
and his pleasure coincide. He enjoys:
The grip on earth of outspread feet,
The life of muscles rocking soft
And smooth and moist in vernal heat.
More than a physical pleasure, chopping the wood is a kind of
contemplation—or at least the occasion for contemplation.
Chopping the "good blocks of beech" gives "a loose to [his] soul."
An attitude of play and enjoyment distinguishes what would
have been the tramps' labor from what is the speaker's work.
Labor is dull, lackluster. Work is undertaken in a spirit of
freedom and enjoyment.
A further consideration is that labor separates, while work
unites. Labor involves separation of what we need to do from
what we choose or like to do. But real work unites need and
choice, need and performance. We labor out of compulsion, we
work freely. We endure labor, we enjoy work. We hold something
back from labor. We say our heart isn't in it. We devote our whole
self to work.

�69

WORK

Work absorbs us totally, as we are totally absorbed when we
play. And that is why work, properly understood, really is play
and why, as Frost concludes the poem:
Only where love and need are really one,
And the work is play for mortal stakes,
Is the deed ever really done....
Work, then, involves an element of play not found in labor.
Work is something we do at our leisure—leisure being understood,
as both Franklin and Thoreau viewed it, as something quite
different from idleness. And the circumstances of our lives in
contemporary America may dispose us to better appreciate the
role of leisure in the lives of both Franklin and Thoreau. We are
better positioned, as heirs to a critique of the "gospel of work"
that has lasted now for well over half a century, to see that while
Thoreau was a dissenting voice in the nineteenth century, a man
trying to wake his neighbors up to an examination of their lives,
his attitude toward leisure is more widely appreciated now,
perhaps the prevailing view.
In discussions of economics and the workplaces of business
and industry we have long heard the phrase "division of labor,"
by which is meant specialization of tasks. But a more important
division has occurred. Work has been divided into its constituent
parts: labor and play. Work has been split, sundered. This creates
a problem, perhaps two problems. Wendell Berry, in The Unsettling
of America: Culture and Agriculture (90-95) writes about a school
of agriculture which let a contract to a waste disposal firm to haul
horse manure off the university farm, and then bought chemical
fertilizers for some of the school's field projects. On the surface,
in the context of rational and efficient procedure, this arrangement
may appear to be—and perhaps is—unexceptional. But, as Berry
observes, the school took a solution and neatly divided it into two
problems.
Something similar occurs when we arrange our lives in such
a way as to divide work into labor and fun/play/entertainment.

Labor, apart from enjoyment or satisfaction, is inevitably dull,
dreary—a problem. Fun or play or entertainment, apart from
achievement, deep involvement, is also a problem. Carol Ely, in
Letters from the Country (frontispiece) quotes Selma Laegerloeff,
the Scandinavian writer, who observes, "The soul is constantly
about to starve; it cannot live on fun alone. If the soul gets no
other food, it will first tear apart other creatures... then itself."
But together, labor and play, effort and pleasure, are a
solution. Frost understands that the tramps are asking him to
separate his work and his play. The tramps, Frost writes,
thought:
My right might be love but theirs was need.
And where the two exist in twain
Theirs was the better right—agreed.
But while the tramps may have a certain logic and conventional
wisdom on their side (the logic and conventional wisdom of
Thoreau's neighbors), the speaker in Frost's poem doesn't allow
them to chop his wood, for he knows that they are asking him to
separate his experience into work, on the one hand, and play, or
pleasure, on the other. Others may allow this to happen, but he
will not.
But yield who will to their separation,
My object in living is to unite
My avocation and my vocation
As my two eyes make one in sight
The dissenting view of Thoreau and Frost is admirably
represented in contemporary America by Wendell Berry (Harper's,
19-24), who realizes that the wholeness of our lives has been
sundered by a "purely economic economy," which promotes an
ideal of competition that excludes affection and robs work of its
pleasure. "That there can be pleasure industries, . ." Berry
writes, "can only mean that our economy is divorced from
pleasure, and that pleasure is gone from our workplaces and our

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

70

dwelling places. Our workplaces are more and more exclusively
given over to production, and our dwelling places to consumption."
Berry contrasts this situation with work which blends labor
with fun and laughter, with affection for neighbors and relatives,
with pleasure and a sense of satisfaction. Berry holds out the
hope of recovering such wholeness and a sense of leisure which
is not incompatible, as Thoreau knew, with productivity. Berry
writes:
It is possible, as I have learned again and again, to be in
one's place, in such company, wild or domestic, and with
such pleasure, that one cannot think of another place that
one would prefer to be, or of another place at all; one does
not miss or regret the past, or fear or long for the future.
Being there is simply all, and is enough. Such times give
one the chief standard and the chief reason for one's work.
A standard and a reason for one's work is certainly what is
required. But, given the diversity of American life, we can be
reasonably certain that a single standard or reason will not prove
satisfactory for everyone. We have a common heritage which
includes the Biblical interpretation of work as a curse, as well as
the view of Enlightenment thinkers, such as Lessing and Goethe,
who found satisfaction and even salvation in ceaseless effort and
activity. But the endless striving of Goethe's Faust, the ceaseless
adventuring of Tennyson's Ulysses, represent only one of two
human impulses: one may be "to strive, to seek, to find, and not
to yield," but the other is to come to rest, to be at peace, as Faust
knew when he imagined being able to say to the moment, "Abide,
you are so fair"; as Frost knows in "Two Tramps in Mud-Time";
as Wendell Berry knows when he writes of the ability to be "in
one's place . . . with such pleasure, that one cannot think of
another place that one would prefer to be
" Ideally these two
impulses, to exert effort and to be at rest, are united in such a way
that one is pleasurably at rest in effort and exertion. And some
people may be able to achieve such a solution in their lives,

managing to make their work their play. Certain entrepreneurs
and tycoons of the past have certainly delighted in their work, as
if it were play. And the contemporary tycoon Donald Trump (1)
asserts, "I don't do it for money. I've got enough, much more than
111 ever need. I do it to do it.... Deals are my art form."
Most people are not likely to be fortunate enough to unite
their avocation and their vocation. Yet many will find an
accommodation with a certain dividedness or separation in their
lives, devoting a certain amount of time to remunerated
employment, but finding their real "work" in activity outside
that employment. Such arrangements are more common than is
generally realized. Ronald Gross (17) writes of "hundreds of
thousands of'invisible scholars'in America today—women and
men pursuing their own intellectual projects, without academic
affiliations"—women and men for whom scholarship is "their joy,
but not their job." Such scholarship has been investigated in
Amateurs: On the Margin Between Work and Leisure, by Robert
Stebbins. While the work of the amateur has been depreciated in
the age of the expert and specialist, one way to recover the
wholeness of work, the sense of affection and play, may be
through the rehabilitation of the status of the amateur.
For still others, for whom the problem is work that is not as
large as they are, a complaint of a woman quoted in Studs
Terkel's Working (xxiv), suggests the solution may be in a
combination of work experiences, either simultaneously, like the
Western North Carolinian described by Wilma Dykeman, or
serially, like the work experiences of people in an earlier America
who had multiple careers. Such solutions provide work that
challenges and offers variety.
Different accommodations will prove possible and satisfactory
for different individuals. What is certain, however, is that the
separation of work from play has reached such a stage in
American life that it has, paradoxically, engendered a new kind
of work, leisure counseling! (Mobly, 16-17) Such counseling has
come into being in response to what the Dutch historian Johan

�71

WORK

Huizinga, in his book Homo Ludens (et passim), sees as the
decline of the play-element in Western culture, and in response
to what Josef Pieper (et passim) sees as a growing incapacity for
leisure.
Such leisure counseling and the people involved in this
profession may popularize a new attitude toward work which
could be liberating to both men and women. This seems to be the
goal of such popular essays as "How To Work For Somebody Else
and Still Be Yourself' by Lisa Burnbach (14). Leisure counselors
and writers on the subject may help parents overcome their
inherited fear of "idleness," which results in their preferring to let
children watch television rather than "do nothing." Parents can
be helped toward a more positive view of "unstructured time" and
toward Franklin's distinction between leisure and idleness, toward
an understanding, not unlike Thoreau's, that hours in which
children do nothing may prove to be, paradoxically, productive.
Certainly it is not uncommon in late-twentieth-century America
for ordinary people to be more thoughtful about the role of work
in their lives, and to agree with Thoreau that "the life which men
praise and regard as successful is but one kind" (338). Throughout
the 1970s and 1980s newspapers and magazines have featured
individuals who turned down promotions in business, government,
and industry that would bring them more money and prestige
but would be, in their view, detrimental to their family or uproot
them from a community. An economics professor (Whitman, 12)
argues that the quest for individual self-fulfillment, which began
in the 1960s, has weakened all traditional models of authority,
including the traditional concept of worker loyalty to the
corporation.
Many Americans have become skeptical of the "gospel of
work." They might agree that, at its best, this gospel or ethic
liberated millions and showed them what was possible through
effort; Americans are also quick, however to see a dark side to the
work ethic, expressed in the term "workaholic." Apopular version
of the work ethic's dark side associates work with Puritanism, as

does Barbara Ehrenreich (10) in a recent essay.
The work ethic came along ...in the form ofPuritanism—
the idea that the amount of self-denial you endured in this
life was a good measure of the amount of fun awaiting you
in the next. But the work ethic only got off the ground with
the Industrial Revolution and the arrival of the factory
system. This was . . . simply a scheme for extending the
benefits of the slave system into the age of emancipation.
This new system is identified with capitalism, described as an
arrangement whereby "huge numbers of people had to be convinced
to work extra hard, at pitifully low wages, so that the employing
class would not have to work at all." The gospel of work,
according to this critique, is capitalism's public relations.
"Overnight, with the help of a great number of preachers and
other well-rested propagandists, work was upgraded from an
indignity to an 'ethic/ "
Not all working Americans share Ehrenreich's flippant cynicism
toward work. But a surprising number do. American businesses
and industries are aware of a different attitude toward work and
of a diminished commitment to work. Many firms and corporations
have responded to worker complaints and dissatisfaction,
particularly where considerations of family and community are
concerned, by experimenting with new maternity leave policies
for both fathers and mothers; by introducing corporate day care
for children; and by efforts to be "good neighbors" in communities
where they are located.
It is clear that many of our dissatisfactions with work are
related to our roles as individuals and as members of families an
communities. For Nora Watson, interviewed in Studs Terkel's
Working (521), her work is unsatisfying because it does not
comport with her sense of herself as an individual. "Most of us,
like the assembly line worker, have jobs that are too small for our
spirit. Jobs are not big enough for people." Therese Carter, a
housewife, derives satisfaction from housework that might

�72

otherwise be drudgery because she does it for her family. "... Til
cook a pie and 111 get to see everybody eat it. This is my offering.
I think it's the greatest satisfaction in the world to know you've
pleased somebody. Everybody has to feel needed. I know Fm
needed. I'm doing it for them...." (303) Philip Da Vinci derives
a similar satisfaction from work done for people beyond the
family circle, in the larger community. A lawyer who left a
position with a large insurance company, Da Vinci found satisfaction
in providing legal services for the poor in Chicago. "I finally got
into something where I actually felt useful" (537).
Old problems related to work persist. The failure of a Southern
state legislature to pass legislation having to do with working
conditions of migrant farm workers has led to the accusation of
a "plantation mentality" on the part of lawmakers ("Plantation
Mentality," 4-A). Issues considered long ago resolved reappear:
within the past two years network news programs have aired
stories about disagreements on the part of unions and garment
industry management concerning the permissibility of work
performed in cottage industry settings, especially in rural areas
and small towns in the Northeast. Ironically, women workers
find the arrangement attractive because it permits them to stay
at home with children and family. The unions argue that the
arrangement leaves the women vulnerable to exploitation and
low wages. While women nave entered the work force outside the
home, they continue to bear burdens and responsibilities as
homemakers—and still women earn lower wages and salaries
than men do, further evidence of injustice and exploitation. In
addition, hundreds of thousands of workers—both men and
women—are becoming members of a downwardly mobile American

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

middle class (Newman). While these work-related issues persist—
it is always, as it was in Dickens' time, the worst of times, the best
of times—others are thinking about getting art into the workplace,
not by making art useful but by making "useful activities
artistic" (Lasch, 45).
We sense that our attitude toward work has changed, but we
cannot foresee where the changes will ultimately lead. History
tells us that our attitude toward work has been influenced by
evolving social and economic views. We are heirs to the eighteenthcentury concept of self-interest; to the subsequent refinement of
that concept, enlightened self-interest; to the concept of the
greatest happiness of the greatest number; to the concept of
utility; the labor theory of value. And just as hardly any scientific
theory is held today that was held when the Industrial Revolution
began around 1760, most social and economic views of that
period have persisted and evolved (Bronowski, 42, 67). And our
views are likely to go on evolving, with implications for the way
we think and feel about work.
We can also be reasonably certain that we are more likely to
find solutions to both private and public problems having to do
with work (such as low productivity, declining innovation) through
our culture—through careful examination and reflection upon
our history, heritage, and collective experience. And that culture
is best focused and reflected in our literature and history.
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, William Dean
HowelTs The Rise of Silas Lapham, and Ole Roelvaagfs Giants in
the Earth provide the basis for text-centered considerations of
the theme of work in American life.

�73

WORK

Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography

The Rise of Silas Lapham

Franklin has often been called the first real American, the
"new man" de Crevecoeur describes in his "Letters from an
American Farmer." Franklin's Autobiography is the story of the
paradigmatic American man; it is the first, and perhaps still the
best American success story, the story of the self-made man who,
through determination, good habits, and, above all, through
diligence and industry, made his own life the most successful of
his many projects.
Franklin (74) explicitly attributes his success to hard work. "I
mention... industry the more particularly and the more freely,"
he writes, "that those of my Posterity who shall read it, may
know the Uses of that Virtue, when they see its Effects in my
Favor throughout this Relation." Franklin worked hard as a
printer, as well as in his many civic undertakings. He helped
found the Junto, an organization for the mutual exchange of
ideas and intellectual improvement, which evolved into the
American Philosophical Society. He helped establish a lending
library; served as postmaster; reorganized the fire department;
established an academy which became the University of
Pennsylvania. He worked on behalf of a program for innoculation
against smallpox. His many projects included efforts to improve
city sewers and pave streets.
With utility and rationality as his overarching values, Franklin
worked to make him self useful to himself, his family, and to his
fellow man. The catalog of virtues, and the daily scorecard—his
"Scheme of Employment for the Twenty-four Hours of a Natural
Day"—he kept in pursuit of them, show how he used "industry as
a means of attaining Wealth and Distinction." American literature
offers no better text than Franklin's Autobiography as a starting
point for a consideration of work as a cultural value.

by William Dean Howells
William Dean HowelTs The Rise of Silas Lapham brings
ethical considerations to bear on the theme of work. The story of
Silas Lapham's success is, like that of Franklin's, a story of
diligence, determination, and hard work. Lapham is a conventional
American success. As the novel opens, Lapham is being interviewed
by a reporter. He proudly displays photos of his wife and daughters
and relates how he was brought up in a large family, later went
to work, bought out a stage route, and eventually made a fortune
manufacturing paint containing a mineral his father had discovered
on their farm. In the paint manufacturing business Lapham had
a partner, one Rogers, who had provided the initial capital
enabling Lapham to get started. Later Lapham had forced
Rogers out, but considered this simply good business.
In the course of the novel Lapham encounters the social
prejudice of Boston Brahmins, who are unimpressed with selfmade men. He suffers business setbacks and begins to speculate.
He builds a new house in an exclusive section of Boston with the
hope of gaining social acceptability. The house burns before he
and his family can occupy it. But when forced to chose between
losing his fortune or participating in a dishonest business venture,
he chooses to lose the greater part of his wealth and to forego his
ambition for social position. Lapham's refusal to sacrifice his
integrity and sense of fairness results in a material decline, but
also in an ethical and moral rise and regeneration. His display of
honesty also wins him the admiration of the Boston Brahmins
whom he could not impress with money.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

74

Giants in the Earth
by Ole Roelvaag
Roelvaagfs Giants in the Earth is the story of a man's struggle
to wrest a living from the earth. The protagonist Per Hansa
moves with his wife and three children from Minnesota to the
Dakota Territory in the late nineteenth century. Per Hansa is
optimistic and exuberant. Working from dawn until past dark,
he clears land and builds a house for him self and his family. He
devotes himself with joy, enthusiasm, and ingenuity to making a
success in the new land, though life is a struggle against cold
weather, drought, and grasshoppers which devour crops. But his
wife has great difficulty in adapting to this pioneer life. She longs
for their old life in a Norwegian village, and in her desperation
turns with fanatical zeal to the solace of religion. When a
neighbor is believed to be near death, and a blizzard is in
progress, Per Hansa's wife urges him to set out into the storm to
seek a minister, since she believes last rites for the neighbor to be
of paramount importance. Per Hansa dies of exposure in the
blizzard while trying to bring a minister to a dying neighbor and
friend.

Giants in the Earth is an epic saga of pioneer life and of the
immigrant experience in America. The conflict between Per
Hansa, obsessed with work, and his wife, for whom personal
feelings and relationships are more important than material
success, affords opportunities to examine changing and unchanging
attitudes and assumptions about work in the context of the
American experience.

Works Cited
Adams, James Truslow. Provincial Society. Vol. III. A History of American Life. Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Alken, Ralph. Contemporary Opinion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1933. Excerpted in the
Louisville, Kentucky Courier-Journal, August 28, 1987: A-7.
Bailyn, Bernard. Voyagers to the West: A Passage in the Peopling of America on the Eve of the
Revolution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986.
Barlett, John. Familiar Quotations. Edited by Emily Morison Beck. Fifteenth and 125th
Anniversary Edition. Revised and Enlarged. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1980.
Berry, Wendell. The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture. San Francisco: Sierra Club
Books, 1977.
—. "The Profit in Work's Pleasure." Harper's Magazine, March 1988:19-24.
Bly, Carol. Letters from the Country. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1981.
Boorstin, Daniel. The Americans: The National Experience. New York: Random House, 1965.
Browning, Robert. The Works of Robert Browning. With introductions by Sir F. G. Kenyon. 10
vols. New York: Ams Press, Inc., 1966.
Bronowski, Jacob. Science and Human Values. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1965.
Carlyle, Thomas. Past and Present. Edited with an introduction and notes by Richard D. Altick.
New York: New York University Press, 1977.
Commager, Henry Steele. The American Mind: An Interpretation of American Thought and
Character Since the 1880s. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
Cords, Nicholas, and Patrick Gerster. Myth and the American Experience. 2 vols. New York,
Beverly Hills: Glencoe Press, 1973.
Dick, Everett. The Dixie Frontier: A Social History of the Southern Frontier from the First
Transmontane Beginnings to the Civil War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.
Donne, John. The Complete Poetry and Selected Prose of John Donne. Edited with an
introduction by Charles M. Coffin. New York: The Modern Library, 1952.
Dykeman, Wilma. The French Broad. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press, 1965.
Ehrenreich, Barbara. "A Farewell to Work." Mother Jones, May 1988:10.
Eissler, K. R. Goethe: A Psychoanalytical Study, 1775-1786. 2 vols. Detroit: Wayne State
University Press, 1963.

�WORK

Emerson, Ralph Waldo.

75

The

Complete

Writings

of

Ralph

Waldo Emerson

in

Six Volumes. New York: William H. Wise &amp; Co., 1923.
Ford, Henry. Quoted in American Issues Forum. February 8 - March 6, 1976.
Fox, Richard. The Liberal Ethic and the Spirit of Protestantism." The Center Magazine,
September/October 1987:4-14.
Franklin, Benjamin. 7770 Autobiography and Other Writings. Selected and edited with an
Introduction by L Jesse Lemisch. New York: New American Library, 1961.
Frost, Robert The Poetry of Robert Frost. Edited by Edward Connery Lathem. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Faust. The original German and a new translation and introduction
by Walter Kaufman. Garden City, New York: Doubleday &amp; Company. Anchor Books
Edition, 1963.
Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd, etal. Like a Family: The Making of a Southern Cotton Mill World. Chapel
Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1988.
Howells, William Dean. The Rise of Silas Lapham. An authoritative text. Composition and
backgrounds. Contemporary responses. Criticism. Edited by Don L Cook. New York: W.
W. Norton &amp; Company, 1982.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens:A Study of the Play Element in Culture. New York: Harper &amp;
Row, 1970.
Krout, John Allen. The Completion of Independence. Vol. V. A History of American Life. Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Lamb, Charles. 7770 Complete Works and Letters of Charles Lamb. New York: The Modern
Library, 1935.
Lasch, Christopher. "The Degredation of Work and the Apotheosis of Art." Harper's Magazine,
February 1984:40-45.
Lessing, Gotthold Ephriam. Kritik und Dramaturgie. Ausgewaehlte Prosa. Stuttgart: RedamVerlag, 1959.
Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth. 77?e Poems. New York: Modern Library, 1950.
Mobly, Tony A. "Leisure Counseling: A New Profession." National Forumf LXII.3 (1982): 16-17.
Parkman, Francis. Pioneers of France in the New World. Boston: Little, Brown and Company,
1907.

Pieper, Josef. Leisure: The Basis of Culture. With an introduction by T. S. Eliot New York:
Pantheon Books, 1964.
"Plantation Mentality Prevails on Farming." Asheville, North Carolina Citizen, June 24,1988:
4-A.
Roelvaag, O. E. Giants in the Earth. Translated from the Norwegian by Lincoln Colcord and the
author. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1927.
Rybczynski, Witold. Home: A Short History of an Idea. New York: Viking Penguin, 1986.
Seldes, George. 7770 Great Thoughts. New York: Ballantine Books, 1985.
Shapiro, Larry, ed. A Book of Days in American History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,
1987.
Stebbins, Robert. Amateurs: On the Margin Between Work and Leisure. Beverly Hills: Sage
Publications, 1979.
Tarbell, Ida. 7770 Nationalizing of Business. Vol. IX. A History of American Ufe. Arthur M.
Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Tennyson, Alfred. Poems of Tennyson. Selected with an introduction and notes by Jerome H.
Buckley. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1958.
Terkel, Studs. Working. New York: Pantheon Books, 1975.
Thoreau, Henry David. A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, Walden; or Life in the
Woods; The Maine Woods; Cape Cod. New York: The Library of American, 1985.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. In two volumes with a critical appraisal of each
volume by John Stuart Mill. New York: Schocken Books, 1961.
Weber, Max. 77?0 Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1958.
Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson. 7770 First Americans. Vol. II. A History of American Life. Arthur
M. Schlesinger and Dixon Ryan Fox, eds. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1929-48.
Whitman, Marina v. N. "Whatever Happened to Company Loyalty?" World Monitor, I.2 (1988):
11-14.
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1976.
Wish, Harvey. Society and Thought in America. 2 vols. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.,
1950.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

76

Participant Reflections: Work
A maze of superstitions was accepted as true, and many of
them profoundly influenced my grandmother's daily work. Some
of these traditions originated in England, others in Ireland and
Scotland, and were absorbed in New England, Pennsylvania,
and in Southern Appalachia. The Indian neighbors of the early
settlers contributed much to the existing folklore. Horton Cooper
points out another contributor to Appalachian superstition.
Superstition, Cooper says, "was acquired by signs and omens of
the lonely and eerie environment, of rugged topography and dark
shadows which the mountains cast at night." Indeed, in the early
existing environment of the Southern Highlands of North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, Alabama,
Georgia, and Kentucky there was an almost endless dark forest
with coves and valleys that looked shadowy in the moonlight and
gave off uncertainty and fear. Thus, a blend of Old World
traditions and the frontier experience gave the Southern
Appalachians a rich folklore of superstitions.
Josephine Buckner, "The
Influence of Appalachian
Superstitions on Farm Work"
As colonial Americans became more advanced and the work
ethic began to change, the American idea of work and the family
also changed. Parents' attitudes toward their children and the
children's attitudes toward work began to make a definite and
drastic change. In the nineteenth century the upper classes saw
children as fragile and in need of scrutiny. Their work consisted
of their studies, and they were not expected to work alongside
theirparents. This attitude goes alongmore with modern parents
than colonial times.
In Families and Work Gerstel points out that nineteenthcentury women "nurtured their children and managed the tensions
husbands brought home from jobs." This description is also

applicable to many women of today, but in addition to nurturing
children and managing tensions, they also have to accept the
responsibilities of being a working woman.
Michelle Wood, "Work and
Family: The Ties that Bind"
In spite of greater job opportunities and more labor-saving
devices for household work, today's woman still has some
uncomfortable moments as she searches for "meaningful work."
The problem seems to include not only the way we are perceived
by others, but also the way we perceive ourselves, a condition
that may simply be indicative of today's society in general, a
place where appearance is everything. Perhaps what is needed is
a healthy dose of the Thoreauvian ideal of expressive individualism;
to allow and even encourage those who march to a cadence all
their own.
Margaret A. Higgins, "Women's
Work in a Man's World: American
Women Looking for Meaningful
Employment"
The authors contend that Americans are no longer committed
to the "nose-to-the-grindstone" way of life. Interestingly enough,
it is the stories by and about American immigrants which bear
this out most clearly (Singer's "ASon from America" and Uchida's
"Of Dry Goods and Black Bow Ties"). Other stories such as "A
Day's Pleasure" and "The Split Cherry Tree" and "A Mother in
Marmville" indirectly lead one to believe that education will help
save one from gruelling physical work. Jerry is going to school in
order to be able to get off the farm. The narrator in "A Mother in
Mannville" is a writer who hires others to do physical labor for
her. The work of an educated person is made to appear less
demanding and therefore preferable.
Jane Woodard, "A Man is Not a
Piece of Fruit"

�77

WORK

Snyder's next two books of poems, Turtle Island (1974) and
Axe Handles (1983) present the most recent synthesis of his
views on work, focusing once again on the tasks of his life and
demonstrating how the physical, social, and meditative aspects
of work go together.
Regarding Wave is Snyder's invocation to the Muse, to the
enternal feminine. He has chosen, he tells us, the spiritual path
represented by "long hair/' which is "... to accept, go through the
powers of nature," contrasting it with the Bhikku or hermitascetic who shaves his head. This is the choice of fertility over
celibacy that opens up a new kind of work for the participant—
the "common work of the tribe" and the family, which requires an
embracing of the real world in all its aspects, and a dedication to
doing good works in a social context. Snyder uses the phrase "the
real work" to identify his new ideal.
Louis H. Palmer, "At the Heart of
Work: A Reading of Gary Snyder's
Poems"
No other American writer so epitomizes the philosophy of the
work ethic as does Benjamin Franklin. Throughout his writings
Franklin extols industry as the primary virtue to be developed by
his colonial contemporaries. Industry is a theme throughout his
Autobiography as he traces his journey from penniless apprentice
to life as a comfortably wealthy statesman, philanthropist, and
public servant. Franklin sets a lofty example by accomplishing
an incredible body of work during his 84 years as writer, scientist,
inventor, and public servant.
June Mann, "Benjamin Franklin:
Philosopher of Industry"
Franklin's contributions to society owe their existance not
only to the Franklin whose persona in the Autobiography indentifies
him with the work ethic, but also to the Franklin, who, in keeping
with the example set by his father, believed that good conversation

at dinner was more important than the dinner itself. Franklin
was a thinker whose leisure time allowed him to develop
intellectually.
Carolyn Cahill, "Franklin: The
Man Behind the Pose"
Although Giants in the Earth was written about an era over
100 years after the American colonial period, the pioneering
conditions under which the characters struggled and their
agriculture-centered lives can be compared in many ways to
those of our first colonists. Nancy Cott, in her book The Bonds of
Womanhood, mentions that in the eighteenth century (the colonial
period) in agricultural areas men and women "shared similar
work patterns; their work, tied to the land, was seasonal and
discontinuous."
Margaret A. Higgins, "Women's
Work in a Man's World: American
Women Looking for Meaningful
Employment"
Giants in the Earth is a powerful novel, one worthy of study
at many levels. Not only does it give to the student a clearer
understanding of immigration, it humanizes this epoch of American
history. Giants in the Earth gives value and worth to our common
heritage that has either been overlooked or unrealistically
sensationalized by television. And most importantly, Giants in
the Earth explores human nature—the lighter as well as the
darker side—and provides insight into our own lives as we make
decisions that help us either defeat or cope with the giants in the
earth.
Danny Lawrence, "Roelvaag^s
Giants in the Earth99

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

78

When Per Hansa is not asked to go to town to buy supplies,
he takes out his ill-humor in work and plows an acre and a half
of land. He discovers the great healing power of work. If you are
disappointed and discouraged—work!
Annye S. Holt, 'The Theme of
Work as a Cultural Value in
American Literature"
Per Hansa exemplifies Turner's frontier characteristics in his
approach to working to conquer the prairie. Strong both physically
and spiritually, he is an eternal optimist who is well suited to
frontier life and believes he can accomplish anything if he works
hard enough. He imposes his will upon life. "The urge within me
drove me, Per Hansa, on and on, and never would I stop; for I
reasoned like this, that where I found happiness others must find
it as well."
Kay Senter, "The Frontier: Land
of Promise, Work, and Reality"
One aspect of the early pioneers' approach to work is
spontaneous innovation, which is present in the work of both Per
Hansa and Jesse Stuart. Facing new situations for which he
knows no precedents, Per Hansa summons his creativity: 'There
was no such thing as the impossible any more" (Roelvaag). In the
beginning he decides to plant potatoes before building a house so
that he can have a good crop both for food and for trading. When
he builds the house, he puts it under the same roof with the barn,
something no other settlers in that community had thought to do.
Interestingly enough, the innovation, individualism, and
competition which are intertwined in both Per Hansa and Jesse
Stuart do not become overly tangled with materialism. Although
some critics feel that Per Hansa is materialistic, all of his
attempts to sell potatoes are efforts to get money to supply
needs—not extravagances—for his family. His attitude toward
material things is evidenced in his thoughts while building his

house: "They had laboured hard and faithfully; well, they would
get their wages in due time, every last one of them—but he
couldn't bother them with such trifles now." Stuart clearly avoids
materialism because he serves as principal on a teacher's salary
and, along with some of his teachers, works without pay for a
time.
Marilyn Raines, "Pioneers at
Work: Per Hansa and Jesse
Stuart"
Riding over to the beach house leased for the summer, a place
to and from which Silas commutes in order to continue working,
he tells Tom Corey the way he spends his "leisure" time:
"There's one thing I always make it a rule to do," he said,
"and that is to give my mind a complete rest from business
while I'm going down on the boat. I like to get the fresh air
all through me, soul and body. I believe a man can give his
mind a rest, just the same as he can give his legs a rest,
or his back. All he's got to do is to use his will power. Why,
I suppose, if I hadn't adopted such rules with the strain
I've had on me for the last ten years, I shoulda been a dead
man long ago."
For Silas, leisure is a preparation for more work. It is being
regulated and governed as if it is a part of work rather than work
being an aspect of his leisurely attitude toward life. Silas, as well
as many of us, would probably miss the irony of the metaphor
used in the title of Helen H. Pilla's article about devloping leisure
skills, "Accumulating Interest in Your Leisure Savings Account,"
and the irony in John W. Kendrick's statement, "Time should be
set aside for spontaneous activities
1 believe basic guidelines
can help people be more productive and effective in their pursuit
of happiness."
Lisa Wishon, "The Relationship of
Work and Leisure"

�79

WORK

Out of Work
Louis EL Palmer, III
Whitlock Junior High School, Spartanburg, South Carolina
This is a curriculum unit for six weeks for ninth grade. It was
developed as a result of a summer seminar for teachers, part of
the Southern Highlands Institute for Educators series on cultural
values in American Literature. The seminar was taught by Jim
Wayne Miller during the summer of 1988 at Appalachian State
University. I have selected materials from a wide variety of
sources, including materials we read during the seminar. Obviously
many of the ideas and suggestions I have incorporated into this
unit were provided by Dr. Miller and the other participants: this
is less an individual work than an attempt to organize and focus
this material into a specific time-frame.
I use a journal format for writing assignments. This allows a
student to build up a body of work before it is turned in and to look
back over that work. Writing about what a class is studying helps
a student to own that subject, to feel involved actively rather
than to submit passively.
Vocabulary can be taken from the reading selections so that
the students learn the words before they come upon them, or
students can make their own vocabulary lists from words they
look up as they read.
Ninth-grade students are a good age to deal with the concept
of work. Many are working themselves for the first time, filling
out those forms and complaining about what the government
takes out. Others are considering dropping out soon, when they
turn sixteen, and are interested in work for that reason.
It was obvious to me from the first that it is unfair and
artificial to speak of work as a theme or "a cultural value." For
most people it is a great deal more than that. It is an activity that
takes up a major part of their lives. Even when we are not "at
work" we spend much of our time at some kind of secondary
work—housework, yardwork—or involved in community work.

We often do some form of work as recreation, such as "working
out." A curriculum unit on work in literature could be as amorphous
as a curriculum unit on "the rest of my life," and it is certainly a
lot to deal with in six weeks, or a year, for that matter. I decided
to try to get a handle on it by dividing it up into six subthemes or
aspects of work, and assigning one to each week. These are
arranged to follow loosely the progression from settlement to a
modern, urban-industrial society with two side-trips to examine
the things we use to help us work and the use we put to time not
used for work. The units are entitled Settlement, Agriculture,
Tools, Industry and Apprenticeship, Choosing and Changing,
and Leisure.
Week 1, day 1. Defining the field
Brainstorming: What is work?
The students suggest and the teacher writes on the board
different catagories of work. Suggest some that we often hear in
the news—whitecollar/bluecollar; public sector / private sector;
service/manufacturing; skilled/unskilled—and list examples of
each. Also give examples of what is meant by seasonal, professional,
part-time, temporary, and other terms we hear applied to work.
Discuss qualifications for various jobs, in terms of education, onthe-job-training, and experience. Discuss the way jobs change
with time (example: typesetters—originally a skilled, fairly highpaying, male-dominated position now done on keyboards by
lower-paid workers, predominately women).
For a homework assignment, students could look in a
newspaper or magazine and find an article about a job or jobs in
general, then bring it in and be prepared to give a report on it to
the class.
Week 1, day 2. Settlement
Start with two or three of the class reports assigned for
homework, then introduce the theme for the week: Settling.
Either through brainstorming or guided discussion, talk about
the problems that the settlers in your area faced. What were they

�80

looking for? What would make a good spot to settle? What would
they need to bring with them? How did they get started once they
selected a place?
Then discuss the work of settlement. What would be a
family's priorities once they found a place? What should be done
first? Have students list what they would need to take with
them—tools and supplies—for such a project. Remind them that
the next trip to the store would be six months away and that
everything would have to be carried on a wagon.
This is a nice introduction to the first reading assignment, an
excerpt from John Ehle's The Land Breakers. I have chosen just
a short passage from the first section, "1779" (Ehle, 7-17). This
passage should make two points: to confirm or disprove theories
about what is needed, and to demonstrate the amount and
variety of work that went into the process of settlement. It can
also be used to show how different, how alien and beautiful, the
primeval forests were, even to those who are familiar with our
forests.
Week 1, day 3.
It helps to explain the various tools whose use is described in
the passage—froe, adze, wedges, maul rings, gouge. These can
be actually brought in and demonstrated during the Tools week.
Discuss the way it must have felt to be the only humans in a
remote area: the fear and lonliness, the dangers. Another aspect
of settlement is isolation. Frost's "The Hill Wife" (126-29) series
of poems gives voice to the fears of a young woman isolated from
all but her husband. These poems can be read quickly as a
narrative. Fear and isolation give us a transition to the next
work.
Week 1, day 4.
The next reading is a short story by James Still, 'The Proud
Walkers," from The Run for the Elbertas (StiU, 16-29). Make the
point that there are still people engaged in the work of settling in
areas that are remote from civilization; point out that it takes

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

place in the 1930s in the mountains of Kentucky, not a very farremoved time compared with 1779.
The story can be used in a variety of ways. I recommend
reading out loud for the wonderful rhythm and vocabulary of
Still's Kentuckians. Here the fear and suspicion felt by the
narrator and his mother turn out to be groundless, and a final
point can be made that much of the work of settlement, especially
at first, was cooperative. Give examples like barn-raisings and
quilting bees, where practical and social needs were combined.
The settlers couldn't afford to separate work and play like we do.
Week 1, day 5.
The final reading is about the settlement of the Midwestern
prairie by immigrants from Norway. It is from Ole Roelvaag's
Giants in the Earth (38-59). I suggest that the students read this
selection, then compare and contrast it with the Ehle or the Still
selections in a short essay, to come to terms with the similarities
and differences that climate and geography made in people's
settlement experiences.
A final point to be made is that in most of our history courses
great emphasis is laid on the explorers and conquerors, but little
on the settlers who were the ones who actually made this country
what it is.
Week 2, day 1. Agriculture
An historical perspective is necessary here because few
young people now have had the experience of growing up in an
agricultural situation, and most farms are large and mechanized.
The decline of the small or family farm has had its effect in a
lessening of self-sufficiency for us all. Have students write about
what they would do if their family was isolated from the means
of supply that they are accustomed to using; or what the family
would do if money became worthless.
Week 2, day 2.
Discuss methods of farming before modern farming machinery.
Again, use the previously read selections from Ehle, Roelvaag,

�WORK

and Still to illustrate the amount of work necessary to cultivate
with hand and animal labor. Frost's poems, "Mowing" (17), "The
Death of the Hired Man" (34), and "After Apple-Picking" (68), can
be used to give vivid illustration to the lives of family farmers.
Week 2, day 3.
Two more Frost poems can be used to illustrate the nightmare
side of the family farm in the post-settlement period: "Home
Burial (51) and "The Hill-Wife" series (126). Both of these show
the strain that isolation and continuous physical work can have
on the individual and the family.
Week 2, days 4 and 5.
I would conclude this section by a discussion of a modern
writer's look at the dissolution of the family agricultural life.
From the stories of Breece D'J Pancake, "Trilobites" (21) and
"First Day of Winter" (163), illustrate lives made desolate by the
passing of this once dominant lifestyle. Still's "I Love My Rooster"
(1) from The Run for the Elbertas also dramatizes this conflict
through a husband/wife coalcamp/farm conflict.
Week 3, day 1. Tools
Start the section on tools with an extended definition of
"tools." Point out that "tool" can mean a skill like reading or
writing complete sentences, as well as a complicated machine
like an automobile or a computer. Students can list the tools
necessary for any of the three periods discussed—settlement,
agriculture, or industrial.
Students read Alice Walker's short story "Everyday Use" as
an introduction to the topic of tools. This story can help to point
out that some of the things we cherish from the past we don't see
anymore as tools, but as folk art.
Week 3, days 2,3, and 4.
Focus with examples or demonstrations of the tools necessary
for settlement, agriculture, and industrialization. Eric Slone's
beautifully illustrated books are very helpful here. Discuss
statements like: "The bush axe is the tool that tamed the South,"

81

or "The cotton gin revolutionized agriculture."
Out of this analysis of how we accomplish what we do will
come the realization that tools are the basis for technique and
technique is the basis for technology. The physical-science definition
of work can be brought in here and used as a "tool" for the
analysis of work in physical and economic terms—what exactly
we mean when we talk of "man-hours" and "labor-intensive" and
"cost-effective."
Week 3, day 5.
To conclude this section, read a selection of poems about tools.
From W. S. Merwin 'Tools" (26) and "Song of Man Chipping an
Arrowhead" (8) from Writings to an Unfinished Accompaniment',
from Gary Snyder "What I Have Learned" (85) and the title poem
(5) from Axe Handles—the second one is a good one to compare
with Frost's "The Axe-Helve" (185); from Doc Dachtler's Drawknife
the title poem and "The Bloomfield Haypress" (9).
Week 4, days 1 and 2. Industry and Apprenticeship

ThiSx section is introduced by Benjamin Franklin's
Autobiography, which can be introduced as the story of a young
man's attempt to get away from the limitations of society and
family in order to make something of himself, rather than as a
story of one of our (yawn!) Founding Fathers. This is an urban
success story dealing with an early period in the industrial
society, but Franklin's experiences are readily contrasted with
those of the rural areas. He must be trained in a technological
expertise, and eventually becomes involved in the mass-production
of what was, in his day, the latest in "information technology."
The main difference between Franklin's development and
that of his rural and settler counterparts is that he, as we do
today, had a much wider field of choices, both to do self-improving
things and to do self-destructive things. A reading of the
Autobiography, then, can be linked to modern social problems
such as drugs, as well as to questions about the training and
education necessary for various vocations.

�82

I would advise a quick run-through, not a long one, and
focusing on these things that students today have in common
with Franklin.
Week 4, day 3.
From HowelTs The Rise of Silos Lapham I recommend reading
the introductory interview with the reporter (5-24) and then
summarizing the remaining plot, pointing out the circular path
that Lapham makes from the stable agricultural world of the
farm through his venture into capitalism and back. Here with
the advent of literary "realism" we see also a sort of nostalgic and
romantic look at the agricultural past.
Individual students might report on the various utopian societies formed during the late nineteenth century, including Brook
Farm, where the young Nathaniel Hawthorne found himself too
exhausted after a long day of physical labor to be able to write.
Week 4, day 4.
We look further into the idealization of the past with Thoreau's
Walden. Students should read Chapter 1, "Economy," for Thoreau's
anti-progressive bias toward the newly industrialized society. A
good writing exercise is to take one of Thoreau's statements and
either defend or refute it using contemporary examples.
Week 4, day 5.
To contrast with Thoreau's view, and more fitting with that of
Silas Lapham, have students read Whitman's "Years of the
Modern," and compare it with Sandburg's "Chicago," written in
the same spirit of optimism sixty years later. In terms of work,
training, education, the horizons have expanded tremendously.
Much of Gary Snyder's work, especially his last two books,
Turtle Island and Axe Handles, have to do with his experiences
with homesteading, which he sees as a resettling in an agricultural
mode after rejecting the industrial/technological worldview. Some

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

attention to these books with work as a unifying theme could
serve to bring together the three periods of development, which
we see as progressive, but which Snyder sees as a conflict
between "old ways" of an environmentally sound lifestyle and the
"invader mentality" of blind progress and ecological exploitation.
Week 5, day 1. Choosing and Changing
Thoreau's and Whitman's contrasting voices lead us to an
important demographic fact: most of the people who are now in
high school will change careers three or four times during their
working years.
Students should think about the jobs that they are interested
in and do cluster diagrams about jobs and the education or
training necessary for those jobs, forming jobs into "families"
that require similar preparation.
Week 5, days 2 and 3.
Students do library research into their chosen professions,
looking at what they can do now to be better prepared and
trained for the job. They will write a 500-word essay describing
what they have done and plan to do.
Week 5, days 4 and 5.
Students will interview a person in their chosen field and
transcribe the interview. This will involve careful choice of
relevant questions, also consideration of the possibility of job
obsolescence and job change in the future.
Week 6, day 1. Leisure
Using brainstorming and class discussion, work on the chickenegg question of work and leisure: do we work so that we can have
leisure, or do we use our leisure time to compensate for the rigors
of working? In this context discuss stress and its effects, the term
"workaholic," and the work-related causes of alcoholism and
drug-abuse.

�WORK

Week 6, day 2. Women's Roles
Several of the readings have had to do with women and their
ambivalent social place vis-a-vis "men's" work. We can trace the
disaffected women in Still's "The Proud Walkers" and Frost's
"The Hill Wife" and "Home Burial" to the modern cliche of the
bored and overindulged housewife who gets ajob to "find herself."
Other examples are the women in Silas Lapham's household, his
wife and daughters. Should women be "free" to do "social" work?
How have changing times changed woman's place in the working
world? Students can discuss or write opinion papers on these
subjects.
Week 6, day 3. Social Leisure
Read Frost's "A Time to Talk" (124) as an introduction to the
question of "down-time" in work. Does the family farmer have an
idea of'loss of productivity" from talking to a neighbor? How has
that changed with industrialization? "Two Tramps in Mud Time"
(275) raises a similar question, as well as the further question
that the robotization of production leads us to ask: Is work a right
or a privilege?
This can lead to the old capitalist/communist arguments
about control over production and the merits of free economic
competition. A good exercise is to hand out opinions at random
and have students support them from their reading.
Week 6, day 4. Reckons for Leisure
Have students give reasons why we need leisure. Use Frost's
"A Lone Striker" (273) and "Directive" (377) as examples of a
person feeling the need to get away. Is the individual justified in
that kind of action? Use Thoreau as another example—he chose
a life of comparative leisure as opposed to one of "quiet desperation."

83

Week 6, day 5. Leftovers
Every unit should have a Leftovers day, but for a final focus
I want to point out that in our industrialized society there are
many by-products of our work and leisure. Two poems about this
detritus, Wallace Stevens'"The Man on the Dump" (163) and Doc
Dachtler's "The Berkeley Dump" (21), both raise, in different
ways, the question of what to do with what is left over. Acontrast
of Stevens' aesthetic view with Dachtler's more practical one
could lead to many different answers. This is a question that
could be asked about the assembly-line worker who has been
replaced by a robot, as well.
In Steinbeck's Travels With Charley (115-119) the writer finds
himself in an uncleaned hotel room and constructs a biography
of its former resident, Lonesome Harry, from the garbage he
leaves behind. In an article in Notes Plus (9) Evelyn Funda
suggests using garbage as a basis for writing assignments.
David Macaulay's Motel of the Mysteries depicts an archaelogical
dig in 4022 that causes the discoverers to mistake a motel room
for a sacred temple. Either of these could be used to lead into an
assignment where we could be analyzed by the content of our
garbage.
In this plan I have tried to provide a general outline for a
discussion of poems and stories about the theme of work in
American literature. I have also tried to tie in these works and
the ideas they generate with contemporary concerns and issues.
Work is something that affects all of us, and the changing
economic and social conditions of the world affect what work is
available. A unit such as this one may serve to provide the
connection that students feel is missing between the school and
the real world. I would hope that it might also allow them to see
the advantages of continuing their education with the goal of
finding the work that they want.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

84

Works Cited
Dachtier, Doc. Drawknife. Winters, California: Konocti Books, 1985.
Ehle, John. The Land Breakers. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1964.
Franklin, Benjamin. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. New York: Macmillan, 1962.
Frost, Robert The Poetry of Robert Frost New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
Funda, Evelyn. "Garbology Exercise." NCTE Notes Plus, January 1989. National Council of
Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois.

Bibliography of Supplemental Works
The letter following each title represent the theme the volume
addresses: Family (F), Community (C), Work (W). Dates in
parentheses are those of the first publication if it differs from the
more recent edition.

Merwin, W. S. Writings to an Unfinished Accompaniment. New York: Atheneum, 1973.

Adams, John and Thomas Jefferson. The Adams-Jefferson Letters. (C) Lester J. Cappon, ed.
Chapel Hill: The University Press, 1959. The usually friendly interchange between two of
our founding fathers concerning their opposed visions of what the new country should
become is still reflected in modern political thought.

Pancake, Breece D'J. The Stories of Breece D'J Pancake. New York: Henry Holt and
Company, 1983.

Anderson, Sherwood. Winesburg, Ohio. (C) New York: The Viking Press, 1966. A fictional
community history, fitting into the early twentieth-century category of literary "realism."

Roelvaag, O. E. Giants in the Earth. New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1955.

Berman, Marshall. All that is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. (W) New York:
Simon and Schuster, 1982. This examination of the experience of modernity defines the
modern period as starting around 1500, and uses Goethe's Faust as a symbol for modern
man. Caught up in a current of constant change, experiencing the disunity and
fragmentation of the old values, he seeks to impose his will upon it, to develop it. Berman
sees modernity not as something recent, but rather as a Western tradition extending back
in time over the past four hundred years.

Geismar, Maxwell, ed. The Whitman Reader. New York: Pocket Books, 1955.
Howells, William Dean. The Rise of Silas Lapham. New York: NAL Penguin, 1980.

Snyder, Gary. Axe Handles. San Francisco: North Point Press, 1983.
Stevens, Wallace. The Palm at the End of the Mind. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971.
Steinbeck, John. Travels With Charley. New York: Bantam, 1975.
Still, James. The Run for the Elbertas. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1980.
Thoreau, Henry David. Walden. New York: New American Library, 1980.
Walker, Alice. In Love and Trouble. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanivich, 1973.

Bradford, William. Of Plymouth Plantation 1620-1647. (C) New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953
(1908). Bradford's famous history of the early settlement. It shows that our stereotype of
the Pilgrim era as grim and repressive is not completely accurate. Bradford gives us insight
into the development of one of our first communities.
Bradstreet, Anne. The Works of Anne Bradstreet. (F) John Howard Ellis, ed. Gloucester,
Massachusetts: Peter Smith, 1962. Bradstreefs poetry shows the passion and depth of
her feelings for members of her family—feelings not generally associated with the
Puritans.
Bronowski, Jacob. Sc/ertceandHuma/? Va/ues.(W) New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1965. In this look
at Western values since the Renaissance Bronowski disagrees with the Romantic
opposition between science and humanism, saying that "Men have asked for freedom,
justice, and respect precisely as the scientific spirit has spread among them."
Byrd, William. The Secret Diary of William Byrd of Westover. (F) Louis B. Wright and Marion
Tinling, eds. Richmond, Virginia: The Dietz Press, 1941. This diary, originally written in
Byrd's idiomatic shorthand code, tells of the personal aspects of the life of one of the
colonies' Southern leaders. Suprisingly modem in his attitudes toward such topics as sex
and leisure, Byrd lets us know that plantation life was not completely a post-Civil War myth
and that our "culture of narcissism" has its roots in our earliest history.
Cheever, John. The Wapshot Chronicle. (F) New York: Harper &amp; Brothers, 1967. This novel
portrays an eccentric New England family living in a declining seaside town in the middle
of the twentieth century. Cheever's characters are improbable and believable. His style is
seamless.
Cords, Nicholas and Patrick Gerster. Myth and the American Experience. (C) New York:
Glencoe Press, 1 973. A series of essays on the mythologization of American cultural traits
and heroes.

�SUPPLEMENTAL WORKS

Dreiser, Theodore. Sister Carrie. (F) Jack Salzman, ed. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970. This
story of ayoung, innocent girl's decline and fail after she comes to the big city is an example
of the literary naturalism of the early twentieth century. It expresses the evil, fallen world
of the nineteenth-century moralism unencumbered by the hope or possibility of
redemption.
Dykeman, Wilma. The Far Family. (F) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966. The story
of the diaspora and return of a leading Tennesse family. Can traditional, rural values
survive in the modern world?
Dykeman, Wilma. Return the Innocent Earth. (W) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Dykeman's novel deals with the Clayburn family and how they make the transition from
being wealthy landowners of the South's agrarian past to participants in the Hobbesian
business climate of the New South. This novel stresses the environmental and social
damage caused by the new paradigm.
Ehle, John. The Land Breakers. (C) New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1964. Ehle's novel deals with the
settlement period in the mountains. A justly acclaimed treatment, it is rich in realistic
details, evoking the experiences of a young couple as they find and settle in a remote
mountain area
Frost, Robert The Poetry of Robert Frost. (W) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
This comprehensive edition contains all of Frost's eleven volumes of poetry. One of
Frosfs major themes is work. He spoke as usual in spite of himself when he said in "New
Hampshire": "I don't suppose the work/ Much matters. You may work for all of me./ IVe
seen times I've had to work myself."
Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin In the Sun. (F) New York: Random House, 1959. This play about
the dreams and disappointments of a black family in Chicago is as eloquent today as it was
when it was written.
Hand, Learned. The Spirit of Liberty. (C) Third edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1952. An eminent judge argues that community and self-interest are not necessarily
mutually exclusive.
Hughes, Charles Evans. Conditions of Progress in Democratic Government. (C) New Haven:
Yale University Press, 1910. One of the best expressions of the progressive philosophy;
Hughes stresses the civic and social responsibilities of the citizen of a modern society.
Isaacs, Harold R. Idols of the Tribe. (C) New York: Harper &amp; Row, 1975. A study of the
relationship between individual identity and group identity in the community.
Jackson, Shirley. 7770 Lottery. (C) Cambridge, Massachusetts: Robert Bentley, 1949. In this
collection is the famous short story of the same name about an ordinary community whose
members have traditions that go back to the fertility rituals of primitive societies. Barbarism
is presented as community tradition.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. (C) New York: Oxford University Press, 1966. In this
pioneering work on the environment Leopold stresses our responsibility for the
environment and defines community as a "man-to-land" concern.
Masters, Edgar Lee. Spoon River Anthology. (C) New York: Macmillan, 1959 (1915). A series
of individual portraits in verse that form a collective artistic portrait of a fictional community.
Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman. (W) Text and criticism, Gerald Weales, ed. New York:
Viking/Penguin, 1977. This play, the story of Willie Loman, is Miller's modern tragedy of a
man dehumanized and destroyed by economic forces and his own blindness about
himself. A classic interpretation of the American dream gone sour.

85

Nelson, William C. Renewal of the Teacher-Scholar. (W) Washington, DC: Association of
American Colleges, 1981. A plea for increased attention to and support for humanistic
concerns in the occupation of teacher in a liberal-arts program.
Oates, Joyce Carol, them. (F) New York: Vanguard Press, 1969. A more recent work in the
tradition of naturalism, Oates' novel deals with the "various problems and complexities" of
being poor in America. A good contrast to The Grapes of Wrath because Oates' detached
treatment lacks both the empathy and the humor that brightened Steinbeck's vision.
Peiper, Josef. Leisure: The Basis of Culture. (W) New York: Random House, 1964. In this work
Pieper argues against the Marxist concept of work in purely social and economic terms,
defining work and leisure in moral terms, which, like the talents of the parable, are gifts
given to man to use for the good of all creation.
Sewall, Samuel. The Diary of Samuel Sewall. (F) New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1973
(1927). A look at the life of the early Massachusetts Bay Colony, both public and private,
from one of the most prominent public figures of the day. Sewall's doubts and feelings of
responsibility and guilt about the burdens of leadership and personal grief offer a sharp
contrast with the attitudes expressed by his Southern colonial counterpart William Byrd.
Smith, Lee. Oral History. (F) New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1983. In this novel Lee Smith has
found her voice—voices, rather—with a ghost story as the starting point, the strange and
spotted history of a family emerges from a series of points of view in a variety of styles.
Steinbeck, John. 7776 Grapes of Wrath. (F) Peter Lisca, ed. New York: The Viking Press, 1972.
Probably the most well-known of Steinbeck's works, this populist novel follows a family of
Okies from the Dust Bowl to the promised land of California. The earnestness of
Steinbeck's message is tempered by the sensitivity and humor of his portrayal.
Still, James. River of Earth. (F) Lexington, Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press, 1978
(1940). A simply and beautifully written book in which Still's ear for spoken language, in all
its idiom and idiosyncrasy, infuses the story of economic and familial hardships with a
"found" quality.
Terkel, Studs. Working. (W) New York: Random House, 1974. This book is a documentation of
how modern Americans feel about and deal with their work. The selections present
interviews with a variety of people from all kinds of occupations.
Thoreau, Henry David. "Life Without Principle." (W) (1854) from Thoreau's Complete Works,
Volume 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1929. This essay cautions the reader not to let the
day-to-day drudgeries and trivialities of life interfere with his vision. "Read not the Times.
Read the Eternities."
"Twain, Mark" (pseud, of Samuel Langhorne Clemens) Pudd'nhead Wilson and Those
Extraordinary Twins. (F) Sidney E. Berger, ed. New York: W. W. Norton &amp; Company,
1980. In his version of the classic children-switched-at-birth story, Twain adds the ironic
twist that one child is black and one is white—but still no one can tell them apart
Wolfe, Thomas. Look Homeward, Angel. (F) New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1982 (1929).
Wolfe's novel has a scope of vision that has rarely been attained in literature. It concerns
in part the relationship between a man and his family, but Wolfe manages to tie in questions
of freedom vs. responsibility, nature vs. nurture, freewill vs. predestination, and so on.

�86

The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

Further Readings
Appalachian Women: An Annotated Bibliography. Sidney Saylor Fair, ed. Lexington, Kentucky:
University Press of Kentucky, 1981. (F/C/W)

Green, Archie. Only a Miner. Studies in Recorded Coal-Mining Songs. Champaign, Illinois:
University of Illinois Press, 1972. (W)

Arnow, Harriette Simpson. Seedtime on the Cumberland. Lexington: University Press of
Kentucky, 1983. (F/C/W)

Hall, Jacquelyn D. and others. Like a Family: The Making of a Southern Cotton Mill World.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1987. (F/W)

—. Flowering of the Cumberland. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1984. (F/C/W)

Hine, Robert V. Community on the American Frontier: Separate But Not Alone. Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press, 1980. (C)

Bailyn, Bernard. Voyagers to the West New York: Knopf, 1986. (W)
Bouvard, Marguerite. The Intentional Community Movement. Kennikat Press, 1975. (C)

Hirsch, E.D. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs To Know. Boston: Houghton Muffin
Company, 1987. (F/C/W)

Cawelti, John G. Apostles of the Self-Made Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
1965. (W)

Kahn, Kathy. Hillbilly Women. Doubleday, 1973. (F/W)

Campbell, John C. The Southern Highlander and His Homeland. 1921; re-issued, University
Press of Kentucky, 1969. (F/C/W)

Kephart, Horace. Our Southern Highlanders. 1922; re-issued, University of Tennessee Press,
1976. (F/C/W)

Carawan, Guy and Candie. Voices from the Mountains: Life and Struggle in the Appalachian
South. Champaign, Illinois: University of Illinois Press. 1982. (W)

King, Stephen Clark. Wheelwright, Kentucky: Community in Transition. Lexington: University
Press of Kentucky, 1982. (F/C/W)

Coles, Robert. Migrants, Sharecroppers, Mountaineers. Little, Brown, 1971. (F/C/W)

Martin, Charles E. Hollybush: Folk Building and Social Change in an Appalachian Community.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1984. (C)

Coles, Robert. Working: Changes and Choices. NY: Human Society Press, 1981. (W)
Driskell, Leon V. Passing Through. A Fiction. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books, 1983. (F)
Dunn, Durwood. Cades Cove: The Life and Death of a Southern Appalachian Community 18181937. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1988. (F/C/W)
Dykeman, Wilma. The French Broad. University of Tennessee Press, 1965. (F/C/W)
Egerton, John. Generations. An American Family. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky,
1983. (F)
Eller, Ronald D. Miners, Millhands, and Mountaineers: Industrialization of the Appalachian
South, 1880- 1930. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1982. (W)
Erickson, Kai. Everything in Its Path: The Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood.
Simon &amp; Schuster, 1977. (C)
Gaventa, John. Power and Powerlessness. Quiescence and Rebellion In an Appalachian
Valley. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1980. (F/C/W)
Gertsel, Naomi and Harriet Gross. Families and Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,
1987. (F/W)

Matthews, E.M. Neighbor and Kin: Life in a Tennessee Ridge Community. Nashville: Vanderbilt
University Press, 1965. (C)
Nathans, Sydney, General editor. The Way We Lived in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University
of North Carolina Press, 1983. (F/C/W)
Norman, Gurney. Divine Right's Trip: A Folktale. Dial Press, 1972. (F)
Schwarzweller, Harry K., James S. Brown, and J. J. Mangalam. Mountain Families in
Transition:A Case Study of Appalachian Migration. Pennsylvania State University Press,
1971. (F/C/W)
Stephenson, John. Shiloh:A Mountain Community. University of Kentucky Press, 1968. (C)
Waller, Altina L Fued: Hatfields, McCoys, and Social Change in Appalachia, 1860-1900.
Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1988. (F/C/W)
Williams, John Alexander. West Virginia and the Captains of Industry. Morgantown: West
Virginia University Press, 1976. (W)

�SUPPLEMENTAL WORKS

Critical Readings of American Thought
Beard, Charles A., and Mary R. Beard. The Rise of American Civilization. Two volumes in one.
Revised and Enlarged. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1942.
One of the most significant studies of American history and civilization, the Beards' work
stresses economic forces which have shaped the American family, influenced community
life, and contributed to the nature of work. The Beards divide American history into The
Agricultural Era (Vol. 1, from the colonial period to the approach of the Civil War), and The
Industrial Era (Vol. 2, from the approach of the Civil War, which they view as a second
American Revolution, to the 1930s). In their view the machine age and the achievements
of new technology result in the disintegration of the colonial family regime, and bring
complicated influences to bear on the American family, and especially on women and
children. Old forms of community are weakened, while others come into being under the
influence of the feminist and club movements. The treatment of work, closely allied to the
economic forces on which this study is focused, is especially detailed, and ranges from a
discussion of the labor supply in the colonial period, through the advances of organized
labor in the nineteenth century and the effect of immigration, to the transformation of work
in the machine age.
Boorstin, DanielJ. The Americans: The National Experience. New York: Random House, 1965.
Spanning the period from the Revolution to the Civil War, this volume continues Boors tin's
history of the American people begun in The Americans: The Colonial Experience,
published in 1958. Boorstin is especially attentive to the nature of the American national
character, and he sees much of American history as a search for community. He shows
how Puritans became Yankees; how stiff-necked dogmatists became "examplars of
ingenuity." With respect to community, the nation did not begin at any one time or place,
but rather again and again. Americans formed new communities and reformed old
communities with such rapidity that within less than a century after the Revolution what
had been a fringe of colonial settlements along the Atlantic seaboard, bound to their mother
countries, had become a continent-nation. Especially relevant are his chapters on
"Organizing the American Factory," "Community Before Government," "Competitive
Communities," and "Invisible Communities: The Negroes' Churches." The material on
marriage among slaves, between whites and Negroes or Indians, and in transient
communities, as well as the discussions of the scarcity of women and domestic servants,
have implications for the topics of family and work.
Commager, Henry Steele. The American Mind: An Interpretation of American Thought and
Character Since the 1880s. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
Commager is especially insightful in his presentation of the paradoxes and tensions in the
American mind: optimism co-existing with determinism; a strong emphasis on the
individual with a tendency to be a joiner. He presents a clear and detailed account of how
changes in the nature of work affected the American woman and hence the family.
Valuable, too, is his account of how mainline American churches, to some extent through
the influence of John Dewey, shifted emphasis from individual salvation to the
reconstruction of community and society.
Lemer, Max. America as a Civilization. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957.
In this monumental 1,036-page study Lerner attempts to see American civilization as a
total pattern. To the degree that he succeeds, it is impossible neatly to identify his
discussions of family, community, and work, since the topics overlap and interpenetrate

87

one another. For instance, in Chapter 4, The Culture of Science and the Machine," Lerner
examines the way in which science and the machine alter the nature of work; the rise of
the individual and family firm; and the factory and corporation as community.
Nevertheless, the titles of certain chapters and subsections suggest their relevance to the
topics of family, community, and work. Chapter 7, "Class and Status in America," contains
a subsection entitled "Class Profile of the Worker." A subsection of Chapter 9, "Character
and Society," entitled "The Cement of Society," deals with the nature of community in
America. Chapter 8, "Life Cycle of the American," has subsections devoted to The Family
as Going Concern," "Children and Parents," "Growing Up in America," "Courtship, Love,
and Marriage," and The Ordeal of the American Woman." "Life Goals and the Pursuit of
Happiness," a subsection of Chapter 9, and Chapter 11, The Arts and Popular Culture,"
deal in varying degrees of directness with leisure, a topic which is a part of any thorough
consideration of work. Because Lerner seeks an overall pattern and does not attempt to
deal with the topics of family, community, and work in a serial manner, no index could
adequately list such topics; however, the index to this ambitious synthesis is helpful in
gaining access to these topics.
Parrington, Vernon Louis. Main Currents in American Thought: An Interpretation of American
Literature from the Beginnings to 1920.3 vols. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company,
1927.
Parrington's study remains a standard work of American literary scholarship, and is still
one of the most stimulating attempts to see American literature as a reflection of social
forces. Volume One, The Colonial Mind, treats the period from 1620 to 1800. Volume Two,
The Romantic Revolution in America, deals with the next six decades, 1800-1860. The
third volume, The Beginnings of Critical Realism in America, focuses on a comparable
period from 1860 to 1920. The topics of family, community, and work are not indexed. For
Parrington's treatment of these topics he must be read leisurely and as general
background to the periods covered. His work is most valuable in dealing with the
paradoxes, tensions, and ambivalance in the American mind, which he traces to the
intellectual heritage of Europe in conflict with a New World environment; to the emergence
of two classes, the yeomanry and the gentry; and to two ideals represented by the Puritan
and the Yankee.
Perry, Ralph Barton. Philosophy of the Recent Past: An Outiine of European and American
Philosophy Since 1860. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1926.
Perry's survey is limited insofar as it covers a period of only about six decades, but his
discussions are accessible to the layman. Perry's non-technical exposition of European
and American philosophy will prove a useful aid to understanding Marx and his influence
on the history of the American labor movement; Darwin and his influence (chiefly through
his interpreter Spencer) on political and economic policies; and of Comte and Durkheim's
influential view on the relationship of the individual to the community. Perry relates
Emersonian transcendentalism to European antecedents, and, generally, links other
American philosophers such as William James, John Dewey, and G. Santayana to the
larger tradition of European thought
Schlesinger, Arthur M., and Dixon Ray Fox, eds. A History of American Life. 13 vols. New York:
The Macmillan Company, 1929-1948.
These volumes, each written by an authority on the period covered, have long been a
standard survey of social growth in America.

�The Examined Life: Family, Community, and Work in American Literature

88

Volume I The Coming of the White Man, by Herbert Ingram Priestly, covers the period
from 1492 to 1848.
Volume II The First Americans, by Thomas Jefferson Wertenbaker, treats the period
from 1607 to 1690.
Volume III Provincial Society, by James Truslow Adams, focuses on the period from
1690 to 1763.
Volume IV The Revolutionary Generation, by Evarts Boutell Greene, deals with the
years between 1763 and 1790.
Volume V 7770 Completion of Independence, by John Allen Krout, treats the period
from 1790 to 1830.
Volume VI 7770 Rise of the Common Man, by Carl Russell Rsh, focuses on the
twenty-year period from 1830 to 1850.
Volume VII 777© Irrepressible Conflict, by Arthur Charles Cole, covers the fifteen-year
period from 1850 to the end of the Civil War, 1865.
Volume VIII 77?e Emergence of Modem America, by Allan Nevins, treats the post-war
period from 1865 to 1878.
Volume IX The Nationalizing of Business, by Ida M. Tarbell, covers the period from
1878 to 1898.
Volume X 77?e Rise of the City, by Arthur Meier Schlesinger, focuses on the same
period as Volume IX, 1878 to 1898.
Volume XI The Quest for Social Justice, by Harold U. Faulkner, is focused on the
period from 1898 to 1914.
Volume XII 77?e Great Crusade and After, by Preston W. Slosson, treats the period
of the First World War and the post-war decade, 1914-1928.
Volume XIII The Age of the Great Depression, by Dixon Wector, covers the period
from 1929 to 1941.
These volumes provide useful information on the topics of family, community, and work,
beginning with Priestley's description of French-American family life in Volume I.
Wertenbaker (Volume II) treats family life in New England giving attention to family size.
In a chapter entitled "Planter and Puritan at Play," he deals with colonial leisure activities
and with laws against idleness. Adams (Volume 111) stresses the importance of the colonial
family to the work of subduing the wilderness, and as a social, economic, and even military
unit. Greene (Volume IV) provides useful information for the Revolutionary period having
to do with family size, birth and death rates, and he stresses the importance of "obscure
men and women who tilled the farms, founded homes and built ordered communities." He
shows how the Revolution divided families, much as the Civil War would a little over a
century later. Krout (Volume V) chronicles the development of Workingmen's parties and
provides a detailed picture of family life and household industries. Fish (Volume VI), in
describing the rise and fall of common man, deals with the importance of the family and
community as institutions assisting and supporting individual immigrants to the United
States. Fish also examines changes in the nature of work during the period covered. Coles
(Volume VII) attributes changes in the American family to The Growing Pains of Society"
(Chapter 7). Alan Nevins (Volume VIII) deals with the crucial post-Civil War period in which
modern America emerged. His account treats trade unions, labor movements, and strikes.
But he does not overtook The Everyday Life of Americans" during the period, and
provides useful information concerning family and community. Ida M. Tarbell's The

Nationalizing of Business (Volume IX) is especially rewarding with regard to the topic of
work. Tarbell continues the chronicle of Workingmen's parties begun in Volume V,
detailing their role in the opposition to immigration. Arthur M. Schlesinger's The Rise of the
City(Volume X), which covers the same period as Tarbell's volume, details the improved
conditions of labor, the growth of leisure activities, and also comments on the effect of the
city on family life. Faulkner's 77?e Quest for Social Justice (Volume XI) deals with the
increasing entry of women into the work force and the implications of this social
phenomenon for family and community. Slosson (Volume XII) chronicles the conditions of
family life and labor during and after World War I. The effects of the Depression on family
and community life are dealt with at length in Wector's 7770 Age of the Great Depression
(Volume XIII). Wector also examines work relief, the Public Works Administration, and the
status of labor under the New Deal.
Spiller, Robert E., and Willard Thorp, Thomas A. Johnson, and Henry Seidel Canby, eds.
Literary History of the United States. Revised Edition in One Volume. New York: The
Macmillan Company, 1953.
The eighty-one chapters of this standard history are, for the most part, the work of
individual contributors, and, as the editors note, differences of opinion among the authors
have been allowed to stand. Nevertheless, the various contributors share a number of
assumptions that contribute to the unity of this study. They see American literature, from
its beginnings, concerned not only with the theme of "cutting loose and faring forth," of
starting over in a new land, but also with the theme of nostalgia for the rich culture of
Europe. They all agree that American literature is an expression of the American
experience, and that our literature helps shape that experience. They tend to see
American literature as a series of cultural waves.
Especially relevant to the topics of family, community, and work are those chapters
treating communitarian experiements, Transcendentalism, and utopianism, as well as
Carl Van Doren's chapter on Benjamin Franklin, Dixon Wecter's "The Education of
Everyman," and Gilbert Chinard's The American Dream."
Wish, Harvey. Society and Thought in America. 2 vols. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.,
1950.
Wish is informative and thought-provoking with respect to the topics family, community,
and work. The author shows how, from the first, America was both a religious and a secular
society in which the Enlightenment and the Great Awakening contributed to the national
character. The battle between rationalism and secularism on the one hand, and faith,
intuition, and revelation on the other, helped shape "a new national psychology" which
would influence views of family, community, and work. Wish documents attitudes toward
work in Puritan New England and cites the views of outstanding individuals from the
colonial and early national period—Washington, Jefferson, Franklin. Similarly, his
discussion of the impact of the frontier on American life, and the connection between
romanticism and the concept of the common man, best expressed in Emerson's blend of
individualism and idealism, contributes to an understanding of the family, the community,
and work in America. His treatment of nineteenth-century Utopian communities is
authoritative. He notes that the attitude toward work in the American South is complicated
by the institution of slavery. But, especially with respect to the topic of work, he fails in his
treatment of one aspect of the South's complexity. At one point (vol. 1, p. 232) he deplores
how poor whites—"listless, slothful people"—have frequently been confused with
Southern highlanders—"far more alert in spirit and independent economically." Later, in a

�89

SUPPLEMENTAL WORKS

discussion of the antebellum South (vol. 1, p. 494ff), he treats both Southern highlanders
and poor whites in a brief section, thereby contributing to the likelihood of the two groups
being confused.
Volume 2 deals with the continuing influence of both religious and secular impulses in the
tension between philosophical determinism and the doctrine of free will, and with William
James1 attempt to resolve this tension in his philosophy of pragmatism. The chapters most
directly relevant to the topics of family, community, and work treat the late nineteenthcentury captains of industry, the labor movement, and the urban impact on rural life and
on the home.

Acknowledgments
This publication proceeds from a four-year project, Cultural Values in American Literature,
sponsored by the Appalachian Consortium with supportive funding from the National
Endowment for the Humanities. The summer institutes and follow-up activities brought together
educators and scholars from throughout the Appalachian region with the intention of
strengthening Humanities education in our public schools.
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following guest presenters and
recognize the wealth of resources they have made available to participating teachers and
schools. Novelists Wilma Dykeman, John Ehle, and Lee Smith and poet Robert Morgan read
from their works and discussed their portrayal of the themes of family, community, and work with
participants. Scholars Edwin Arnold and James Uoyd presented lectures on William Faulkner.
Native American Culturalist Eustace Conway held a program examining Native American
perspectivies on work.
Curriculum workshops offering suggestions for exploring cultural values with students
were held by William Clauss, Office for Rural Education at Western Carolina University;
Johnathan Sher, North Carolina REAL Enterprises, Chapel Hill; Julia Thomason, Appalachian
State University; and Max Thompson, Appalachian State University. Elizabeth Long, Director
of the ASU-Public School Partnership presented a workshop on establishing college-public
school partnerships. Faculty representatives who served as liaisons between their institution
and participating schools were Jed Bierhaus of Warren Wilson College, Roberta Herrin of East
Tennessee State University, and William Lightfoot of Appalachian State University.
We would like to thank participant Louis H. Palmer for contributing the annotated
bibliography of supplemental readings. Finally, we would like to recognize the following
teachers who took part in the program and the schools which supported their participation.
Lynn Avant—Mabel Elementary School, Zionville, NC
Leta Baharestan—Cocke County School, Newport, TN
Willa Ann Baker—Harris Middle School, Spruce Pine, NC
Barbara Benson—Watauga High School, Boone, NC
Harry K. Books—Lawrence Middle School, Winston-Salem, NC
Narisse Bravard—West Alexander Jr. High, Taylorsville, NC
James Brooks—West Wilkes High School, Millers Creek, NC
Robert Brown—Belton-Honea Path High School, Honea Path, SC
Josephine Buckner—Oak Hill Junior High School, Morganton, NC

Carolyn Bumgarner—Burns Junior High School, Lawndale, NC
Carolyn Cahill—Morristown Hamlben High East, Morristown, TN
Patricia Chastain—Powell High School, Powell, TN
Judy Church—Belton-Honea Path High School, Honea Path, SC
Patricia Collis—Harris Middle School, Spruce Pine, NC
Stan Coss—Polk Central High, Mill Spring, NC
B. C. Crawford—St Stephens High School, Hickory, NC
Tammy Forbes—Bassett High School, Bassett, VA
Sherrie Hartsoe—West Iredell High School, Statesville, NC
Margaret Higgins—Asheville-Buncombe Optional School, Asheville, NC
Janice Hildebrand—Hibriten High School, Lenoir, NC
Gloria Hinson—Bethel School, Waynesville, NC
Laura Hodges—Watauga High School, Boone, NC
Annye Holt—Asheville High School, Asheville, NC
Linda lovacchini—A. C. Reynolds Middle School, Asheville, NC
Robinette Kimble—Edwards Junior High School, Central, SC
Danny Lawrence—Carver High School, Winston-Salem, NC
June Mann—Watauga High School, Boone, NC
Louis H. Palmer—Whitiock Junior High School, Spartanburg, SC
Leatrice Pearson—South Caldwell High School, Hudson, NC
Marilyn Raines—Edwards Junior High School, Central, SC
Patricia Ramsey—McDowell High School, Marion, NC
Carolyn Ratiedge—South Greene High School, Greeneville, TN
Kay Senter—Morristown East High School, Morristown, TN
Rita Silver—Chesnee High School, Chesnee, SC
Vickie Sutton—Franklin High School, Franklin, NC
Wilma Snyder—Dobyns-Bennett High School, Kingsport, TN
Elizabeth Watson—Polk Central High School, Mill Spring, NC
Lisa Wishon—Starmount High School, Booneville, NC
Michelle Wood—G. W. Carver High School, Fieldale, VA
Jane Woodard—Salem Junior High School, Morganton, NC

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="82">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="889375">
                  <text>Appalachian Consortium Press Publications</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="889376">
                  <text>This collection contains digitized monographs and collections from the Appalachian Consortium Press.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="889377">
                  <text>Appalachian Consortium Press</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="889379">
                  <text>Appalachian Consortium Press&#13;
</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="94">
              <name>Date Issued</name>
              <description>Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource.</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="889447">
                  <text>June 1, 2017</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="890311">
                  <text>&lt;a title="Digital Scholarship and Initiatives" href="http://library.appstate.edu/services/digital-scholarship-and-initiatives" target="_blank"&gt;Digital Scholarship and Initiatives&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="17">
      <name>Publication</name>
      <description/>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="205">
          <name>Digital Publisher</name>
          <description>Digital Republication</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="890944">
              <text>Appalachian State University</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="889956">
                <text>The Examined Life: Family, Community, Work in American Literature</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="889957">
                <text>&lt;p&gt;Concerned with the 50% dropout rate for public high school students in the Southern Highlands, Jim Wayne Miller published this book in 1989 to ensure that young people had access to published works and other text that examine the themes of familiy, community, and work. Miller intended to provide public school teachers with the tools to engage students and stimulate meaningful conversations. Miller produced a work that guides students to reflect on their heritage, see the bigger picture, and develop a broader perspective of human existence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="Epub" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/12D0SCHlnxpunr27xeB2pUv1eBHmSnmFG/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"&gt;Download EPub&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="87">
            <name>Abstract</name>
            <description>A summary of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="889958">
                <text> &#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="889959">
                <text>Miller, Jim Wayne</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="889963">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="891217">
                <text>Appalachian Consortium Press  &#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="891468">
                <text>American literature--History and criticism</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="892169">
                <text>American literature--Appalachian Region--Study and teaching (Secondary)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="893790">
                <text>United States--Civilization</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="893788">
                <text>1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="906928">
                <text>Appalachia</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1106949">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1108487">
                <text>E-books</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1107019">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1107159">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed" target="_blank"&gt;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="115">
            <name>Spatial Coverage</name>
            <description>Spatial characteristics of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1107252">
                <text>https://www.geonames.org/12212302/appalachia.html</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1107312">
                <text>&lt;a title="UA 76 Appalachian Consortium records" href="https://appstate-speccoll.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt; UA 76 Appalachian Consortium records &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="104">
            <name>Is Part Of</name>
            <description>A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1107382">
                <text>&lt;a title="Appalachian Consortium Press Publications" href="https://omeka.library.appstate.edu/collections/show/82" target="_blank"&gt; Appalachian Consortium Press Publications&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="116">
            <name>Temporal Coverage</name>
            <description>Temporal characteristics of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1116054">
                <text>1980s</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="7">
        <name>Appalachia</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3040">
        <name>Community</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6875">
        <name>essays</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="500">
        <name>family</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6893">
        <name>lesson plans</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6891">
        <name>literature</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="32749" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12355">
        <src>https://omeka-test.library.appstate.edu/files/original/52258ec16aa64c47674cb673fff25d28.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b15ab449c1d2fade3b9239a57562a9b4</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="9">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="199">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="802896">
                    <text>��������������������������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="27">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="786096">
                  <text>Leo Finkelstein Papers</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="786097">
                  <text>This collection contains materials relating to Leo Finkelstein, resident of Asheville, North Carolina, the Asheville Lions Club, and the Beth Ha-Tephila Cemetery in Asheville. It contains computer discs, notes, scrapbooks, book drafts, correspondence, photographs, programs, fliers, and other materials related Leo Finkelstein, his wife Sylvia, and the Lions Club, Elks Club, and Jewish Community in Asheville, North Carolina.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="37">
              <name>Contributor</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="786098">
                  <text>Finkelstein, Leo, 1905-1998</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="686351">
                <text>Leo Finkelstein Photograph Album/Scrapbook 4, personal photographs, 1981 - 1998</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="686354">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="686356">
                <text>107_01_06_PhotoAlbum_04_PersonalPhotos_1981_1998_M</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="792327">
                <text>This item contains photographs, primarily from the 1980s, of Leo Finkelstein's life and family. Also included are event programs, clippings, and letters as well as Harry Finkelstein's membership card for the Traveler Protective Association, St. Louis, Missouri, and telegrams and obituaries regarding the death of Harry Finkelstein.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="875060">
                <text>Finkelstein, Leo, 1905-1998--Family--Photographs&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="875061">
                <text>Finkelstein, Harry--Death and burial&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="875062">
                <text>Finkelstein, Harry--Photographs&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="875063">
                <text>Finkelstein, Leo, 1905-1998--Correspondence</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="985342">
                <text>&lt;a title=" In Copyright - Rights-holder(s) Unlocatable or Unidentifiable" href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0//" target="_blank"&gt; In Copyright - Rights-holder(s) Unlocatable or Unidentifiable &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097659">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097750">
                <text>&lt;a title="AC.107 Leo Finkelstein Papers" href="https://appstate-speccoll.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/192" target="_blank"&gt; AC.107 Leo Finkelstein Papers &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="104">
            <name>Is Part Of</name>
            <description>A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097816">
                <text>&lt;a title=" Leo Finkelstein Papers" href="https://omeka.library.appstate.edu/collections/show/27" target="_blank"&gt; Leo Finkelstein Papers &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097841">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097854">
                <text>Image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="112">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1097953">
                <text>80 pages</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1098022">
                <text>Asheville (N.C.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="115">
            <name>Spatial Coverage</name>
            <description>Spatial characteristics of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1098074">
                <text>https://www.geonames.org/4453066/asheville.html</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="500">
        <name>family</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3386">
        <name>german shepherd</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3387">
        <name>grandchildren</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3389">
        <name>Harry Finkelstein death</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3018">
        <name>Lions Club</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="645">
        <name>photograph</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3388">
        <name>Phyllis</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3383">
        <name>Western Union</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="15331" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="10007">
        <src>https://omeka-test.library.appstate.edu/files/original/eceb1d104c21d8755453159ab6fd8fcd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>78dd66d870b49cac74995d9177468630</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="9">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="199">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="800899">
                    <text>��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="17">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="786078">
                  <text>Kirby and Eller Family Letters</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="786079">
                  <text>The Kirby and Eller Family Letters contain correspondence between the Kirby and Eller families of Ashe County, North Carolina. The letters focus mainly on day-to-day events such as planting and harvesting crops, health and illness, and household tasks, but also include references to the Civil War. The original letters of Collection 495 Kirby and Eller Family Letters, 1826-1938 are in the W.L. Eury Appalachian Collection.&#13;
&lt;div class="subnote "&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="less"&gt;Elizabeth “Bettie” Kirby (1851-1925) was born on February 15th, 1851 in Meadow Creek, Virginia, to parents Joel Kirby and Frances Roberts. Millard F. Kirby, Samuel J. Kirby, Emory T. Kirby, and Ada B. Kirby were her siblings. She married Joseph Lafayette Eller on September 22, 1875 in Ashe County, NC, where she lived until her death on December 9, 1925.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Luke Eller (1806-1883) was born on June 8, 1806 in Ashe Co., NC. He was married to Sarah King&lt;span class="elipses"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="more"&gt; on March 27, 1829 in Ashe Co. He is the father of Joseph Lafayette Eller (Elizabeth’s husband), Hansford Eller, and Aswell Eller. Luke Eller lived in Ashe Co. until his death on December 6, 1883.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;span class="note-content readmore expanded"&gt;&lt;a href="https://appstate-speccoll.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/165#" class="expander"&gt;See less&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="955399">
                  <text>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://appstate-speccoll.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/165"&gt;AC.495 Kirby and Eller Family Letters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="955400">
                  <text>&lt;a title="In Copyright – Educational Use Permitted" href="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/?language=en 8" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; In Copyright – Educational Use Permitted &lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="785776">
                <text>Letter from C. S. and Julia Everett to Nannie Kirby</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="785777">
                <text>Everett, P.J.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="956135">
                <text>Weather</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="112">
            <name>Extent</name>
            <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="785780">
                <text>2 pages</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="785781">
                <text>Letter_nd_021.pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="856518">
                <text>This letter to Fannie starts with several pages written by Julia Everett, Fannie Kirby's cousin. Julia talks about the weather, which has been -22° Fahrenheit. She goes on to talk about domestic life and marriage, as well as horses. Julia's husband, C. S. Everett, finishes out the letter by writing about how he wishes to visit North Carolina and see friends and family. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="934124">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="954799">
                <text>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://appstate-speccoll.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/165"&gt;AC.495 Kirby and Eller Family Letters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="955782">
                <text>&lt;a title="In Copyright – Educational Use Permitted" href="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/?language=en 8" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; In Copyright – Educational Use Permitted &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="104">
            <name>Is Part Of</name>
            <description>A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="966250">
                <text>&lt;a title=" Kirby and Eller Family Letters" href="https://omeka.library.appstate.edu/collections/show/17" target="_blank"&gt; Kirby and Eller Family Letters &lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="115">
            <name>Spatial Coverage</name>
            <description>Spatial characteristics of the resource.</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1094980">
                <text>https://www.geonames.org/4453028/ashe-county.html</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1109629">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1109832">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1110938">
                <text>Letters (Correspondence)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1115672">
                <text>Ashe County (N.C.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="6535">
        <name>“The Old North State”</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6840">
        <name>C. S. Everett</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6538">
        <name>Cold Weather</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="500">
        <name>family</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3858">
        <name>family letters</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="127">
        <name>Julia Everett</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6839">
        <name>Louisburg Kans.</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6537">
        <name>Minnesota</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="107">
        <name>Nannie Kirby</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="653">
        <name>North Carolina</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="6838">
        <name>Whitetop Mountain Va.</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
